Skip to content

Conversation

Guglieee
Copy link

No description provided.

@carstenflokstra
Copy link
Contributor

You forgot to update the README pizzaiolo.

@mawerty
Copy link
Owner

mawerty commented Jan 12, 2024

I dont really know what should I do with this PR, in most normal languages people write just "No" but here we have a some kind of pizza function. What should I do?

@KimioN42
Copy link
Contributor

I think for better consistency and reliability we should stick with "no". This new implementation is way to prone to bugs and could impact the >95% accuracy that this project aims for when calculating prime numbers, specially because this particular function doesn't even seem to return the appropriate answer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants