Port codemod into lute #454
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Vighnesh-V
reviewed
Oct 21, 2025
Vighnesh-V
requested changes
Oct 21, 2025
Collaborator
Vighnesh-V
left a comment
Vighnesh-V
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, the requests do be a bit repetitive :( lots of luacasing to do + we have a cli parser - we should augment that if it's missing anything or use that rn.
Vighnesh-V
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR copies the codemod implementation mostly as-is into lute, invokable via
lute transform. The main tweak I made was to load migrations by the path passed via the CLI, rather than usingrequire, so that migration paths don't have to be passed relative to the codemod source code.