Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libc++] Verifies std::forward_like's mandates clause. #127318

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mordante
Copy link
Member

@mordante mordante commented Feb 15, 2025

The existing using _ForwardLike declaration already fails with a subsitution failure. The LWG issue was filed to clarify what should happen for non-referencable types.

Added test to verify libc++ is already enforcing the new Mandates.

Implements:

  • LWG3757 What's the effect of std::forward_like(x)

Closes: #105026

The existing using _ForwardLike declaration already fails with a
subsitution failure. The LWG issue was filed to clarify what should happen
for non-referencable types.

Added test to verify libc++ is alrady enforcing the new mandates.

Implements:
- LWG3757 What's the effect of std::forward_like<void>(x)

Closes: llvm#105026
@mordante mordante requested a review from a team as a code owner February 15, 2025 12:54
@llvmbot llvmbot added the libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi. label Feb 15, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 15, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx

Author: Mark de Wever (mordante)

Changes

The existing using _ForwardLike declaration already fails with a subsitution failure. The LWG issue was filed to clarify what should happen for non-referencable types.

Added test to verify libc++ is alrady enforcing the new mandates.

Implements:

  • LWG3757 What's the effect of std::forward_like<void>(x)

Closes: #105026


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/127318.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx23Issues.csv (+1-1)
  • (added) libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/forward/forward_like.verify.cpp (+46)
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx23Issues.csv b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx23Issues.csv
index 1215f21985eb9..6471fdbf069a3 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx23Issues.csv
+++ b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx23Issues.csv
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
 "`LWG3753 <https://wg21.link/LWG3753>`__","Clarify entity vs. freestanding entity","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
 "`LWG3754 <https://wg21.link/LWG3754>`__","Class template expected synopsis contains declarations that do not match the detailed description","2022-11 (Kona)","|Nothing To Do|","",""
 "`LWG3755 <https://wg21.link/LWG3755>`__","``tuple-for-each`` can call ``user-defined`` ``operator,``","2022-11 (Kona)","|Complete|","17",""
-"`LWG3757 <https://wg21.link/LWG3757>`__","What's the effect of ``std::forward_like<void>(x)``?","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
+"`LWG3757 <https://wg21.link/LWG3757>`__","What's the effect of ``std::forward_like<void>(x)``?","2022-11 (Kona)","|Nothing To Do|","",""
 "`LWG3759 <https://wg21.link/LWG3759>`__","``ranges::rotate_copy`` should use ``std::move``","2022-11 (Kona)","|Complete|","15",""
 "`LWG3760 <https://wg21.link/LWG3760>`__","``cartesian_product_view::iterator``'s ``parent_`` is never valid","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
 "`LWG3761 <https://wg21.link/LWG3761>`__","``cartesian_product_view::iterator::operator-`` should pass by reference","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/forward/forward_like.verify.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/forward/forward_like.verify.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..279f0e60a1c38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/forward/forward_like.verify.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+// REQUIRES: std-at-least-c++23
+
+// <utility>
+
+// template <typename T>
+// [[nodiscard]] constexpr
+// auto forward_like(auto&& x) noexcept -> see below;
+
+// Mandates: T is a referenceable type (3.45 [defns.referenceable]).
+
+#include <utility>
+
+struct incomplete;
+
+void test() {
+  int i;
+  (void)std::forward_like<incomplete>(i);
+
+  (void)std::forward_like<void>(i);                // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<const void>(i);          // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<volatile void>(i);       // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<const volatile void>(i); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+
+  using fp   = void();
+  using cfp  = void() const;
+  using vfp  = void() volatile;
+  using cvfp = void() const volatile;
+  (void)std::forward_like<fp>(i);
+  (void)std::forward_like<cfp>(i);  // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<cfp>(i);  // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<vfp>(i);  // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<cvfp>(i); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+
+  using fpr  = void()&;
+  using fprr = void()&&;
+  (void)std::forward_like<fpr>(i);  // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+  (void)std::forward_like<fprr>(i); // expected-error {{no matching function for call to 'forward_like'}}
+}

Copy link
Contributor

@philnik777 philnik777 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't we test all of this with SFINAE tests instead?

@mordante
Copy link
Member Author

Can't we test all of this with SFINAE tests instead?

I don't think we can. With SFINAE we test a constraint clause and this is a mandates clause.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
libc++ libc++ C++ Standard Library. Not GNU libstdc++. Not libc++abi.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LWG3757: What's the effect of std::forward_like<void>(x)?
3 participants