Skip to content

blip-0060: trampoline payments to legacy Bolt11 invoices #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

t-bast
Copy link
Contributor

@t-bast t-bast commented Mar 27, 2025

Trampoline routing allows nodes to send payments with limited access to the network graph, by relying on trampoline nodes to compute the missing parts of the route. The BOLTs only specify how such payments can be made to recipients who either support the trampoline feature or use Bolt12 with a blinded path. This leaves a gap when paying legacy nodes that don't support any of those features.

This bLIP provides a mechanism to pay such legacy invoices, by revealing some of the invoice data to the last trampoline node, who converts the trampoline payment to a standard payment.

@arik-so @joostjager as discussed during the last spec meeting, this is what we currently use to pay non-trampoline Bolt11 invoices.

[Trampoline routing](lightning/bolts#836) allows
nodes to send payments with limited access to the network graph, by
relying on trampoline nodes to compute the missing parts of the route.
The BOLTs only specify how such payments can be made to recipients who
either support the trampoline feature or use Bolt12 with a blinded path.
This leaves a gap when paying legacy nodes that don't support any of
those features.

This bLIP provides a mechanism to pay such legacy invoices, by revealing
some of the invoice data to the last trampoline node, who converts the
trampoline payment to a standard payment.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant