[DO NOT MERGE] emulation: ✨ Add branchName and use it in process of knowledge suggestion #1086
Conversation
…d database schema - Introduced a new column `branchName` to the `KnowledgeSuggestion` model in the Prisma schema. - Created migration scripts to add the `branchName` column to the existing database table. - Updated TypeScript types in `database.types.ts` to include the new `branchName` field for row, insert, and update operations.
…anch names - Removed hardcoded branch name from the `approveKnowledgeSuggestion` action, now using `suggestion.branchName` for improved flexibility. - Updated the `updateFileContent` function to accept a string parameter for the branch instead of a default value. - Adjusted the `processCreateKnowledgeSuggestion` function to pass the dynamic branch name. - Enhanced documentation to reflect the transition to dynamic branch name management for KnowledgeSuggestion operations.
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
Review of Database Schema ChangesThe recent modifications to the database schema, particularly the addition of the Migration SafetyThe introduction of a new non-nullable column ( Data IntegrityThe new Project Rules ConsistencyThe shift from hardcoded branch names to dynamic handling in the approval process is a positive step towards flexibility. However, it introduces the potential for inconsistencies if different parts of the application do not adhere to the same logic for branch name management. A unified approach should be established to ensure all components treat branch names consistently. Recommendations
By addressing these issues, the schema changes can be implemented more safely and effectively, ensuring both data integrity and consistency across the application. Migration URL: https://liam-app-git-staging-route-06-core.vercel.app/app/migrations/40 |
Review of Schema ChangesThe recent modifications to the database schema, particularly the addition of the Identified Issues
Recommendations
By addressing these concerns, the integrity and performance of the database can be safeguarded during the schema update process. Migration URL: https://liam-erd-web.vercel.app/app/migrations/132 |
hoshinotsuyoshi
requested review from
FunamaYukina,
junkisai,
MH4GF and
NoritakaIkeda
and removed request for
a team
|
Temporarily set to PR-ready for PR-Agent review |
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Latest suggestions up to c8aa8f6
Previous suggestionsSuggestions up to commit c8aa8f6
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
/improve |
|
/improve --pr_code_suggestions.commitable_code_suggestions=true |
![qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1068000?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| suggestion.fileSha, | ||
| suggestion.title, // Use title as commit message | ||
| installationId, | ||
| branch, | ||
| suggestion.branchName, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Add a fallback value for suggestion.branchName in case it's undefined or null. This ensures the GitHub API call won't fail if the branchName property is missing from older records in the database. [possible issue, importance: 7]
New proposed code:
const success = await updateFileContent(
repositoryFullName,
suggestion.path,
suggestion.content,
suggestion.fileSha,
suggestion.title, // Use title as commit message
installationId,
- suggestion.branchName,
+ suggestion.branchName || 'tmp-knowledge-suggestion',
)| sha: string, | ||
| message: string, | ||
| installationId: number, | ||
| branch = 'tmp-knowledge-suggestion', | ||
| branch: string, | ||
| ): Promise<boolean> => { | ||
| const [owner, repo] = repositoryFullName.split('/') | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: The function should validate all input parameters, not just the repository name parts. Add validation for the branch parameter to ensure it's not empty or malformed, especially since it's now being passed dynamically from the database rather than using a hardcoded default value. [Learned best practice, importance: 6]
| sha: string, | |
| message: string, | |
| installationId: number, | |
| branch = 'tmp-knowledge-suggestion', | |
| branch: string, | |
| ): Promise<boolean> => { | |
| const [owner, repo] = repositoryFullName.split('/') | |
| export const updateFileContent = async ( | |
| repositoryFullName: string, | |
| filePath: string, | |
| content: string, | |
| sha: string, | |
| message: string, | |
| installationId: number, | |
| branch: string, | |
| ): Promise<boolean> => { | |
| const [owner, repo] = repositoryFullName.split('/') | |
| if (!owner || !repo) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid repository name format') | |
| } | |
| if (!branch || branch.trim() === '') { | |
| throw new Error('Branch name cannot be empty') | |
| } |
test emulation: #1033
Issue
Why is this change needed?
What would you like reviewers to focus on?
Testing Verification
What was done
🤖 Generated by PR Agent at c8aa8f6
branchNamefield toKnowledgeSuggestionmodel for dynamic branch management.branchName.KnowledgeSuggestionto use dynamic branch names.updateFileContentandprocessCreateKnowledgeSuggestionfunctions.Detailed Changes
5 files
Refactored approval process to use dynamic branch namesUpdated TypeScript types to include `branchName`Modified `updateFileContent` to accept dynamic branch namesUpdated `processCreateKnowledgeSuggestion` to handle `branchName`Updated Prisma schema to include `branchName` field3 files
Added migration to include `branchName` in database schemaUpdated SQL schema to include `branchName` columnAdded Supabase migration for `branchName` column1 files
Documented dynamic branch name feature in progress notesAdditional Notes