feat: initial Page Builder plugin implementation #65
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThis change introduces a comprehensive page builder module for the Medusa application, including backend API endpoints, database models, migrations, workflows, and a TypeScript SDK. It also adds a full-featured admin UI for managing posts, sections, and site settings, with React components, hooks, context providers, and data tables. Supporting packages for types and SDKs are included. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant AdminUI
participant SDK
participant API
participant DB
AdminUI->>SDK: createPost(data)
SDK->>API: POST /admin/content/posts
API->>DB: Insert post record
DB-->>API: New post
API-->>SDK: post data
SDK-->>AdminUI: post data
AdminUI->>SDK: listPosts(query)
SDK->>API: GET /admin/content/posts?query
API->>DB: Query posts
DB-->>API: Posts list
API-->>SDK: posts list
SDK-->>AdminUI: posts list
AdminUI->>SDK: updatePost(id, data)
SDK->>API: PUT /admin/content/posts/:id
API->>DB: Update post record
DB-->>API: Updated post
API-->>SDK: updated post
SDK-->>AdminUI: updated post
AdminUI->>SDK: deletePost(id)
SDK->>API: DELETE /admin/content/posts/:id
API->>DB: Delete post record
DB-->>API: Deletion confirmation
API-->>SDK: deletion result
SDK-->>AdminUI: deletion result
sequenceDiagram
participant AdminUI
participant SDK
participant API
participant DB
AdminUI->>SDK: duplicatePost(id)
SDK->>API: POST /admin/content/posts/:id/duplicate
API->>DB: Duplicate post and relations
DB-->>API: New duplicated post
API-->>SDK: duplicated post
SDK-->>AdminUI: duplicated post
Suggested reviewers
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments. If you are seeing this consistently it is likely a permissions issue. Please check "Moderation" -> "Code review limits" under your organization settings.
🛑 Comments failed to post (78)
apps/medusa/src/scripts/seed.ts (1)
108-111: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling for missing tax providers.
The provider selection logic uses a simple string inclusion check which may not be robust. If no tax provider with "system" in its ID is found,
taxProviderwill be undefined, leading toundefinedbeing passed asprovider_idin the tax region creation.Consider adding explicit error handling:
const taxProviders = await taxModule.listTaxProviders(); const taxProvider = taxProviders.find((provider) => provider.id.includes('system')); + + if (!taxProvider) { + logger.warn('No system tax provider found. Tax regions will be created without a provider.'); + }Alternatively, if a tax provider is required for proper functionality, consider throwing an error:
const taxProviders = await taxModule.listTaxProviders(); const taxProvider = taxProviders.find((provider) => provider.id.includes('system')); + + if (!taxProvider) { + throw new Error('System tax provider is required but not found. Please ensure a tax provider with "system" in its ID is available.'); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const taxModule = container.resolve(Modules.TAX); const taxProviders = await taxModule.listTaxProviders(); const taxProvider = taxProviders.find((provider) => provider.id.includes('system')); if (!taxProvider) { logger.warn('No system tax provider found. Tax regions will be created without a provider.'); }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/scripts/seed.ts around lines 108 to 111, the code finds a tax provider by checking if its ID includes 'system', but does not handle the case where no such provider is found, which can cause undefined to be used later. Add a check after finding the taxProvider to verify it is not undefined; if it is, either throw a descriptive error or handle the missing provider case explicitly to prevent passing undefined as provider_id.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/[id]/duplicate/route.ts (1)
7-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for robustness.
The route handler looks clean but should include error handling for cases where the workflow fails or the post ID is invalid.
Consider adding error handling:
export const POST = async ( req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse, ) => { const id = req.params.id + if (!id) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Post ID is required' }) + } + try { const { result } = await duplicatePostWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { id, }, }) res.status(200).json({ post: result }) + } catch (error) { + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to duplicate post' }) + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const POST = async ( req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse, ) => { const id = req.params.id if (!id) { return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Post ID is required' }) } try { const { result } = await duplicatePostWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { id, }, }) res.status(200).json({ post: result }) } catch (error) { res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to duplicate post' }) } }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/[id]/duplicate/route.ts around lines 7 to 20, the POST route handler lacks error handling for failures in the duplicatePostWorkflow or invalid post IDs. Wrap the workflow call and response in a try-catch block, and in the catch block, send an appropriate error response with a relevant status code and message to handle errors gracefully.apps/medusa/package.json (1)
51-51: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Review the stability of the 0.0.1 version dependency.
The
@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdkdependency is at version 0.0.1, which suggests it's in early development. Consider the stability implications for production use.
🌐 Web query:
What are the best practices for using 0.0.x version dependencies in Node.js projects?💡 Result:
When working with 0.0.x version dependencies in Node.js projects, it's important to understand their implications and how to manage them effectively. These early-stage packages require special consideration due to their potentially unstable nature.
Understanding 0.0.x Versioning
In semantic versioning (SemVer), version numbers follow the pattern of
major.minor.patch. For packages with version 0.0.x, this indicates that the software is in very early development stages[5]. In this pre-release phase, the software's API is not considered stable, and even patch updates might include breaking changes.According to semantic versioning principles, major version zero (0.y.z) is specifically designed for rapid development[5]. When a package is at version 0.0.x, it means even patch-level changes might contain significant updates or breaking changes.
Best Practices for Managing 0.0.x Dependencies
Pin Exact Versions
When using dependencies with 0.0.x versions, it's best to specify exact versions rather than using version ranges with carets (^) or tildes (~)[3]. This prevents unexpected updates that could break your application.
"dependencies": { "early-stage-package": "0.0.4" // Exact version instead of ^0.0.4 }Use package-lock.json
Always commit your
package-lock.jsonfile to ensure reproducible builds across different environments. This file records the exact versions retrieved during installation, guaranteeing consistency for all team members and deployment environments[3].Regular Auditing
Frequently run
npm outdatedto check for updates to your 0.0.x dependencies, but review each update carefully before applying it to your project[1].Testing Before Updating
Always test thoroughly after updating any 0.0.x dependencies, as even patch updates might introduce breaking changes. Create a comprehensive test suite to verify that your application still functions as expected after updates[1].
Alternative Approaches
Consider Git Repositories
For highly unstable dependencies, consider pointing directly to Git repositories with specific commit hashes instead of using npm versions[2]. This gives you precise control over which version of the code you're using:
"dependencies": { "unstable-package": "github:username/repo#commit-hash" }Forking Dependencies
If a 0.0.x dependency is critical to your project but unstable, consider forking it to maintain your own stable version until the original package matures.
When to Use 0.0.x Dependencies
Development Projects
0.0.x dependencies are more acceptable in development tools, prototypes, or experimental projects that aren't deployed to production.
When Alternatives Don't Exist
Sometimes you may need functionality that's only available in early-stage packages. In these cases, carefully consider the risks and potentially implement fallbacks.
By following these best practices, you can minimize the risks associated with using early-stage dependencies while still benefiting from innovative packages in the npm ecosystem.
Citations:
- 1: https://www.browserstack.com/guide/update-npm-dependencies
- 2: https://github.com/bahmutov/talks/blob/master/dependencies-best-practices-node.md
- 3: https://dev.to/typescripttv/understanding-npm-versioning-3hn4
- 4: https://snyk.io/blog/best-practices-create-modern-npm-package/
- 5: https://semver.org
Evaluate production readiness of
@lambdacurry/[email protected]Pre-1.0.0 releases may introduce breaking changes even on patch bumps. Please review the stability implications and put controls in place:
- Ensure you’ve committed
package-lock.jsonso installs are reproducible.- You’re already pinning to
0.0.1(good)—avoid range specifiers (e.g.^0.0.1).- Expand your test coverage around any page-builder functionality to catch upstream changes.
- Schedule regular audits (
npm outdated) and manually review each new patch before upgrading.- For critical flows, consider locking to a specific Git commit or maintaining a local fork until the SDK hits 1.0.0.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/package.json at line 51, the dependency @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk is pinned to version 0.0.1, which is an early development version and may be unstable for production. To address this, ensure the package-lock.json file is committed to lock exact versions, avoid using version ranges like ^ or ~, increase test coverage around this SDK's usage to detect breaking changes early, regularly run npm outdated and review updates carefully, and consider using a Git commit hash or a forked version for critical functionality until the SDK reaches a stable 1.0.0 release.packages/page-builder-sdk/src/sdk/store/store-page-builder.ts (1)
6-11:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove console.log and implement actual functionality.
This appears to be placeholder/test code that isn't production-ready:
- The
console.logstatement should be removed from production code- The method name
testsuggests this is temporary- The implementation returns a hardcoded message
- async test() { - console.log(this.client) - return { - message: 'Hello, world!', - } - } + // TODO: Implement actual store page builder methods + // Example methods might include: + // async getPage(id: string) { ... } + // async getPages(params?: PageQueryParams) { ... } + // async searchPages(query: string) { ... }Would you like me to help implement the actual store page builder methods based on the API endpoints and use cases for this module?
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// TODO: Implement actual store page builder methods // Example methods might include: // async getPage(id: string) { ... } // async getPages(params?: PageQueryParams) { ... } // async searchPages(query: string) { ... }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/src/sdk/store/store-page-builder.ts around lines 6 to 11, remove the console.log statement and replace the placeholder test method with actual functionality relevant to the store page builder. Rename the method from 'test' to a meaningful name that reflects its purpose, and implement logic that interacts with the appropriate API endpoints or data sources to return real data instead of a hardcoded message.apps/medusa/src/admin/sdk.ts (2)
5-5: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider environment-specific fallback handling.
The hardcoded localhost fallback is convenient for development but may pose security risks in production if the environment variable is missing.
-export const backendUrl = __BACKEND_URL__ ?? 'http://localhost:9000'; +export const backendUrl = __BACKEND_URL__ ?? (() => { + if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') { + throw new Error('BACKEND_URL must be defined in production'); + } + return 'http://localhost:9000'; +})();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const backendUrl = __BACKEND_URL__ ?? (() => { if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') { throw new Error('BACKEND_URL must be defined in production'); } return 'http://localhost:9000'; })();🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/sdk.ts at line 5, the fallback URL is hardcoded to localhost, which is insecure for production. Modify the fallback logic to use environment-specific defaults by checking the current environment (e.g., NODE_ENV) and only default to localhost in development. For production, either require the environment variable to be set or use a safer default URL to avoid exposing the app to security risks.
3-3: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the global variable declaration pattern.
The
declare constapproach is standard for build-time injected variables. Ensure this aligns with your build system's variable injection mechanism.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify how __BACKEND_URL__ is injected during build fd -t f "webpack.config" -o | head -5 fd -t f "vite.config" -o | head -5 rg -A 3 -B 3 "__BACKEND_URL__"Length of output: 820
To locate where
__BACKEND_URL__is actually defined for your build, let’s search for both Vite and Webpack configs and inspect anydefine/DefinePluginusage:This will show us exactly how and where
__BACKEND_URL__is injected at build time. Once confirmed, we can ensure the fallback is only used locally and there’s no unintended exposure in production.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 1. List possible Vite/Webpack config files echo "➜ vite.config.* files:" fd -t f vite.config* || true echo echo "➜ webpack.config.* files:" fd -t f webpack.config* || true echo # 2. If you have a vite.config.*, dump the defineConfig block for cfg in $(fd -t f vite.config*); do echo "=== $cfg ===" rg -A5 -B2 "defineConfig" "$cfg" echo done # 3. If you have a webpack.config.*, dump any DefinePlugin usage for cfg in $(fd -t f webpack.config*); do echo "=== $cfg ===" rg -A5 -B2 "DefinePlugin" "$cfg" echo done # 4. Confirm all references to __BACKEND_URL__ in the repo echo "➜ References to __BACKEND_URL__:" rg -C3 "__BACKEND_URL__"Length of output: 1477
Let’s also check whether the admin app uses a different config (Next.js, .env files, etc.) to inject
__BACKEND_URL__:This will confirm if
__BACKEND_URL__is wired up outside of Vite/webpack, or if the fallback is always in effect.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 1. Look for Next.js config in the root and apps/medusa echo "➜ next.config.* files:" fd -t f next.config* || true echo # 2. If any Next config exists, show env overrides for cfg in $(fd -t f next.config*); do echo "=== $cfg ===" rg -C2 "env" "$cfg" || echo " No env block found" echo done # 3. List any .env files echo "➜ .env* files:" fd -t f .env* || true echo # 4. Check for BACKEND_URL in .env files for envf in $(fd -t f .env*); do echo "=== $envf ===" rg -i "backend_url" "$envf" || echo " No BACKEND_URL entry" echo doneLength of output: 15005
Missing build-time injection for
__BACKEND_URL__It looks like there’s no Vite or Webpack config wiring
__BACKEND_URL__into your admin build. As a result,backendUrlwill always beundefinedand fall back tohttp://localhost:9000(even in production).• apps/medusa/src/admin/sdk.ts
declare const __BACKEND_URL__: string | undefined; export const backendUrl = __BACKEND_URL__ ?? 'http://localhost:9000';• No
vite.config.*orwebpack.config.*in apps/medusa/ defines__BACKEND_URL__viadefineorDefinePlugin.Please add a bundler config for your admin frontend (e.g.
apps/medusa/vite.config.tsornext.config.js) that injects:define: { __BACKEND_URL__: JSON.stringify(process.env.BACKEND_URL) }and ensure
BACKEND_URLis set in your deployment environment.This will guarantee that
backendUrlpoints to the correct backend in all environments.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/sdk.ts at line 3, the global variable __BACKEND_URL__ is declared but not injected at build time, causing backendUrl to default to localhost even in production. To fix this, add a bundler configuration file for the admin frontend (such as apps/medusa/vite.config.ts or next.config.js) that defines __BACKEND_URL__ by injecting process.env.BACKEND_URL using the define or DefinePlugin option. Also, ensure the BACKEND_URL environment variable is properly set in your deployment environment so the correct backend URL is used in all builds.apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/models/post-tag.ts (1)
13-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Establish proper relationship for created_by_id.
The
created_by_idfield should be a proper foreign key relationship rather than just a text field. This would ensure referential integrity and enable proper querying.Consider establishing a proper relationship to the user entity:
- created_by_id: model.text(), + created_by: model.belongsTo(() => UserModel, { + mappedBy: 'created_post_tags' + }),Alternatively, if you need to keep it as a simple text field for loose coupling, consider adding validation or constraints.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/models/post-tag.ts at line 13, the created_by_id field is currently defined as a text field, but it should be changed to establish a proper foreign key relationship to the user entity to ensure referential integrity and enable proper querying. Modify the schema to define created_by_id as a foreign key referencing the users table or the appropriate user model, replacing the text() type with a relation type or foreign key constraint as supported by the ORM or database schema. If maintaining it as a text field is necessary, add validation or constraints to ensure data integrity.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/EditorBreadcrumbs.tsx (2)
9-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary for post data access.
The component should handle cases where post data might be unavailable or still loading.
Consider adding error handling:
export const PostEditorBreadcrumbs = () => { - const { post } = usePost(); + const { post } = usePost(); + + if (!post) { + return null; // or a loading state + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const PostEditorBreadcrumbs = () => { const { post } = usePost(); if (!post) { return null; // or a loading state } // …rest of the component using post }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/EditorBreadcrumbs.tsx around lines 9 to 11, the component accesses post data without handling cases where the data might be unavailable or loading. Add error boundary logic or conditional checks to verify if post exists and is fully loaded before accessing its properties. If post is undefined or loading, render a fallback UI or loading indicator to prevent runtime errors and improve user experience.
22-24:
⚠️ Potential issueFix type safety and navigation logic.
Several issues with the last breadcrumb item:
- Using
as stringtype assertions without null checks is unsafe- The last breadcrumb should not have a path (represents current page)
post.idshould not be used as a navigation path- { - label: post.title as string, - path: post.id as string, - }, + { + label: post.title || 'Untitled Post', + path: '', // Last breadcrumb should not be clickable + },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{ label: post.title || 'Untitled Post', path: '', // Last breadcrumb should not be clickable },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/EditorBreadcrumbs.tsx around lines 22 to 24, remove the unsafe 'as string' type assertions by adding proper null or undefined checks for post.title and post.id. Also, ensure the last breadcrumb item does not have a 'path' property since it represents the current page and should not be navigable. Replace the use of post.id as a path with a more appropriate value or omit it entirely for the last breadcrumb.packages/page-builder-types/package.json (1)
7-7: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify TypeScript version is current and secure.
Please ensure that TypeScript 5.7.3 is the latest stable version and check for any security advisories.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest stable version of TypeScript and are there any security advisories for TypeScript 5.7.3?💡 Result:
Latest Stable Version of TypeScript
The latest stable version of TypeScript is 5.8. This release was announced and made available in March 2025, marking it as the most current major release at this time[1][2][5][8]. TypeScript 5.8 offers new features, performance improvements, and enhanced type safety over earlier versions.
Security Advisories for TypeScript 5.7.3
As of now, there are no known public security advisories specifically reported for TypeScript version 5.7.3 in the official release notes or announcements[3][5][7][9]. The search results do not indicate any vulnerabilities or exploits targeting TypeScript 5.7.3 or its core functionality.
Note: There is a critical security advisory for Nagios XI version 5.7.3 regarding a remote command injection vulnerability[6], but this is unrelated to TypeScript. This mention does not concern the TypeScript language or its tooling.
Summary Table
Item Status Latest stable TypeScript version 5.8 Security advisories for 5.7.3 No known advisories as of May 2025 If you are currently using TypeScript 5.7.3, it is recommended to upgrade to 5.8 to benefit from the latest features, bug fixes, and ongoing support[1][2][4][5].
Citations:
- 1: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-5-8/
- 2: https://www.typescriptlang.org/download/
- 3: https://github.com/microsoft/typescript/releases
- 4: https://www.codertrove.com/articles/typescript-2025-whats-new
- 5: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/
- 6: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/48959
- 7: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/typescript/announcing-typescript-5-7-beta/
- 8: https://visualstudiomagazine.com/articles/2025/03/11/microsoft-ports-typescript-to-go-for-10x-native-performance-gains.aspx
- 9: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-5-7.html
- 10: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-5-4.html
Upgrade TypeScript to the Latest Stable Release
TypeScript 5.8 is the current stable version (released March 2025). While there are no known security advisories against 5.7.3, upgrading will give you the latest features, bug-fixes, and ongoing support.
• packages/page-builder-types/package.json
– Dev dependencytypescript(line 7) should be bumped.Suggested diff:
--- a/packages/page-builder-types/package.json +++ b/packages/page-builder-types/package.json @@ -7,1 +7,1 @@ - "typescript": "5.7.3" + "typescript": "^5.8.0"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."typescript": "^5.8.0"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-types/package.json at line 7, the TypeScript version is set to 5.7.3, which is outdated. Update the version string to 5.8 to use the latest stable release, ensuring access to new features, bug fixes, and ongoing support.apps/medusa/src/section-config.ts (1)
1-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add TypeScript type definitions for better type safety.
The configuration lacks proper type definitions, which could lead to runtime errors if field types are misspelled or the structure is incorrect.
Consider adding type definitions:
+export interface SectionContentField { + name: string; + type: 'TextInput' | 'TextArea' | 'ActionItem'; + required: boolean; +} + +export interface SectionConfig { + name: string; + description: string; + contentFields: SectionContentField[]; +} + -export const sectionsConfig = [ +export const sectionsConfig: SectionConfig[] = [Additionally, consider using an enum for field types:
export enum SectionFieldType { TEXT_INPUT = 'TextInput', TEXT_AREA = 'TextArea', ACTION_ITEM = 'ActionItem' }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/section-config.ts within lines 1 to 23, the sectionsConfig array lacks TypeScript type definitions, risking runtime errors from incorrect field types or structure. Define interfaces or types representing the shape of section objects and their contentFields, then annotate sectionsConfig with these types. Additionally, create an enum for field types (e.g., TextInput, TextArea, ActionItem) and use it in the type definitions and the config to enforce valid field type values.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostSettingsSidebar.tsx (1)
27-30: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to the afterDelete callback.
The
afterDeletecallback is async but lacks error handling. Consider wrapping the navigation logic in a try-catch block to handle potential navigation errors gracefully.afterDelete={async () => { - close(); - navigate('/content'); + try { + close(); + navigate('/content'); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error during post deletion cleanup:', error); + // Consider showing user feedback here + } }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.afterDelete={async () => { try { close(); navigate('/content'); } catch (error) { console.error('Error during post deletion cleanup:', error); // Consider showing user feedback here } }}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostSettingsSidebar.tsx around lines 27 to 30, the async afterDelete callback lacks error handling. Wrap the close() and navigate('/content') calls inside a try-catch block to catch any errors during navigation. In the catch block, log or handle the error appropriately to ensure graceful failure without unhandled promise rejections.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/SearchableSelect.tsx (2)
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove ESLint disable and fix underlying type issues.
The disabled ESLint rule suggests there are type redundancy issues that should be addressed rather than suppressed.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/SearchableSelect.tsx at line 1, remove the ESLint disable comment for @typescript-eslint/no-redundant-type-constituents and refactor the TypeScript types in the file to eliminate any redundant constituents. Review the type definitions and union types to ensure they are minimal and non-repetitive, thereby resolving the linting errors without suppressing the rule.
12-23:
⚠️ Potential issueFix ref type safety issues.
The component has several type safety concerns:
forwardRef<HTMLSelectElement, Props>declares anHTMLSelectElementref, but the underlyingSelectcomponent expects aSelectInstanceref from react-select- Complex type casting with
as unknown as LegacyRef<SelectInstance<...>>indicates a type mismatch- Final cast
as unknown as React.FC<Props>suggests forwardRef typing issuesConsider this refactor to properly align the ref types:
-export const SearchableSelect: React.FC<Props> = forwardRef<HTMLSelectElement, Props>((props, ref) => { +export const SearchableSelect = forwardRef< + SelectInstance<unknown, boolean, GroupBase<unknown>>, + Props +>((props, ref) => { return ( <Wrapper {...props}> {(inputProps) => ( <Select {...inputProps} - ref={ref as unknown as LegacyRef<SelectInstance<unknown, boolean, GroupBase<unknown>>>} + ref={ref} /> )} </Wrapper> ); -}) as unknown as React.FC<Props>; +});This eliminates the type casts and aligns the ref type with what react-select expects.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const SearchableSelect = forwardRef< SelectInstance<unknown, boolean, GroupBase<unknown>>, Props >((props, ref) => { return ( <Wrapper {...props}> {(inputProps) => ( <Select {...inputProps} ref={ref} /> )} </Wrapper> ); });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/SearchableSelect.tsx between lines 12 and 23, the ref type is incorrectly declared as HTMLSelectElement while the Select component expects a SelectInstance ref, causing unsafe type casts. To fix this, change the forwardRef generic type parameter to use SelectInstance with appropriate generics instead of HTMLSelectElement, remove the complex type assertions on the ref prop, and avoid the final cast to React.FC<Props>. This will ensure the ref type matches the underlying Select component and eliminate unsafe type casting.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/page.tsx (1)
15-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for post creation.
The
handleCreatePostfunction lacks error handling. If thecreatePostmutation fails, the user won't receive feedback and the navigation won't occur, leaving them in an unclear state.Consider adding a try-catch block to handle potential errors:
const handleCreatePost = async () => { + try { const post = await createPost({ title: '', content: {}, type: 'page', }); navigate(`/content/editor/${post.post.id}`); + } catch (error) { + // Handle error - could show toast notification or other user feedback + console.error('Failed to create post:', error); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const handleCreatePost = async () => { try { const post = await createPost({ title: '', content: {}, type: 'page', }); navigate(`/content/editor/${post.post.id}`); } catch (error) { // Handle error - could show toast notification or other user feedback console.error('Failed to create post:', error); } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/page.tsx around lines 15 to 23, the handleCreatePost function does not handle errors from the createPost mutation, which can leave users without feedback if the operation fails. Wrap the createPost call and subsequent navigation inside a try-catch block. In the catch block, handle the error appropriately, such as displaying an error message to the user, to ensure clear feedback and prevent navigation on failure.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/create-post-section.ts (1)
26-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve rollback safety and error handling.
The rollback function could be more robust in handling edge cases and should ensure the sectionId exists before attempting deletion.
async (data, { container }) => { if (!data) return; - const { sectionId } = data; + const { sectionId } = data; + + if (!sectionId) return; const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); - await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(sectionId); + try { + await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(sectionId); + } catch (error) { + // Log rollback failure but don't throw to avoid masking original error + console.error('Failed to rollback post section creation:', error); + } },This ensures the rollback operation is safer and won't fail if
sectionIdis undefined.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async (data, { container }) => { if (!data) return; const { sectionId } = data; if (!sectionId) return; const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); try { await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(sectionId); } catch (error) { // Log rollback failure but don't throw to avoid masking original error console.error('Failed to rollback post section creation:', error); } }, );🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/create-post-section.ts around lines 26 to 35, the rollback function should first check if sectionId exists before calling deletePostSections to avoid errors when sectionId is undefined. Add a conditional guard to verify sectionId is defined and valid before proceeding with the deletion to make the rollback safer and more robust.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/create-post.ts (1)
27-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve rollback logic safety and error handling.
The rollback function has a potential issue where it assumes
postIdexists in the data without validation. If the main step fails after creating the post but before returning the StepResponse, the rollback data might be undefined or incomplete.Consider adding proper validation and error handling:
async (data, { container }) => { if (!data) return - const { postId } = data + const { postId } = data + if (!postId) { + console.warn('No postId provided for rollback, skipping post deletion') + return + } const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) - await pageBuilderService.deletePosts(postId) + try { + await pageBuilderService.deletePosts(postId) + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to rollback post creation:', error) + // Don't throw here to avoid masking the original error + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async (data, { container }) => { if (!data) return const { postId } = data if (!postId) { console.warn('No postId provided for rollback, skipping post deletion') return } const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) try { await pageBuilderService.deletePosts(postId) } catch (error) { console.error('Failed to rollback post creation:', error) // Don't throw here to avoid masking the original error } },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/create-post.ts around lines 27 to 36, the rollback function assumes postId exists in data without validation, risking errors if data is undefined or incomplete. Add a check to confirm data and postId are defined before proceeding with rollback. If postId is missing, handle the error gracefully, possibly by logging or skipping the rollback to avoid runtime exceptions.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/duplicate-post.ts (1)
43-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add safety check in rollback function.
The rollback function should verify that the data object and newId exist before attempting to delete the post to prevent potential runtime errors.
async (data, { container }) => { - if (!data) return; + if (!data?.newId) return; const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); // Delete the created post if workflow fails await pageBuilderService.deletePosts(data.newId); },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async (data, { container }) => { if (!data?.newId) return; const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); // Delete the created post if workflow fails await pageBuilderService.deletePosts(data.newId); },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/duplicate-post.ts around lines 43 to 50, the rollback function attempts to delete a post using data.newId without verifying if data and newId exist. Add a safety check to confirm that both data and data.newId are defined before calling pageBuilderService.deletePosts to avoid runtime errors.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/Error.tsx (1)
13-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and error handling.
The current implementation assumes
messagesis always a valid object, which could lead to runtime errors if the structure is unexpected.const MultipleMessages = ({ messages }: { messages: MultipleFieldErrors }) => { - const errors = Object.entries(messages).map(([_, message]) => message); + const errors = Object.entries(messages || {}).map(([_, message]) => message).filter(Boolean); + + if (errors.length === 0) { + return null; + } const displayedError = errors[0]; const remainderErrors = errors.slice(1);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const MultipleMessages = ({ messages }: { messages: MultipleFieldErrors }) => { const errors = Object.entries(messages || {}).map(([_, message]) => message).filter(Boolean); if (errors.length === 0) { return null; } const displayedError = errors[0]; const remainderErrors = errors.slice(1); // … }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/Error.tsx around lines 13 to 17, the code assumes that the messages prop is always a valid object, which can cause runtime errors if it is undefined or not an object. Add type checks to verify that messages is an object before processing it. If messages is invalid, handle it gracefully by returning null or an appropriate fallback to prevent runtime errors.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/[id]/page.tsx (2)
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log statement.
Debug console.log statements should not be present in production code.
const { data: post } = useAdminFetchPost(id as string); - console.log('🚀 ~ PostDetailsPage ~ id:', id);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: post } = useAdminFetchPost(id as string);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/[id]/page.tsx at line 15, remove the console.log statement used for debugging to ensure no debug logs remain in the production code.
12-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper validation for post ID parameter.
The current implementation uses type assertion without validation, which could lead to runtime errors if the ID is undefined.
const PostDetailsPage = () => { const { id } = useParams(); + + if (!id) { + return <div>Post ID is required</div>; // Or redirect to posts list + } + - const { data: post } = useAdminFetchPost(id as string); + const { data: post } = useAdminFetchPost(id);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const PostDetailsPage = () => { const { id } = useParams(); if (!id) { return <div>Post ID is required</div>; // Or redirect to posts list } const { data: post } = useAdminFetchPost(id);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/[id]/page.tsx around lines 12 to 14, the post ID parameter is used with a type assertion without validating if it is defined, risking runtime errors. Add a check to verify that the ID exists before using it in useAdminFetchPost. If the ID is undefined, handle this case appropriately, such as showing an error message or returning early to prevent further execution with an invalid ID.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/ColorInput.tsx (1)
10-13: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation and error handling.
The
handleChangefunction doesn't validate if the input value is a valid color format, which could lead to invalid states when users type invalid hex codes in the text input.Consider adding validation:
const handleChange = (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { - onChange(e.target.value); + const value = e.target.value; + // Basic hex color validation for text input + if (e.target.type === 'text' && value && !value.match(/^#([0-9A-Fa-f]{3}){1,2}$/)) { + return; // Don't update if invalid hex format + } + onChange(value); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const ColorInput: React.FC<ColorInputProps> = ({ onChange, selectedColor, onKeyDown, onBlur }) => { const handleChange = (e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { const value = e.target.value; // Basic hex color validation for text input if (e.target.type === 'text' && value && !value.match(/^#([0-9A-Fa-f]{3}){1,2}$/)) { return; // Don't update if invalid hex format } onChange(value); };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/ColorInput.tsx around lines 10 to 13, the handleChange function lacks validation for the input color value, allowing invalid color formats to be passed. Add validation logic inside handleChange to check if the input value is a valid hex color code before calling onChange. If the value is invalid, prevent the update or handle the error appropriately to avoid invalid states.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post-section.ts (1)
8-14: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling and input validation.
The step lacks error handling and input validation, which could cause workflow failures without proper error reporting.
export const deletePostSectionStep = createStep(deletePostSectionStepId, async (id: string, { container }) => { + if (!id || typeof id !== 'string') { + throw new Error('Invalid post section ID provided'); + } + + try { const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(id); return new StepResponse({ id }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to delete post section: ${error.message}`); + } });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const deletePostSectionStep = createStep( deletePostSectionStepId, async (id: string, { container }) => { if (!id || typeof id !== 'string') { throw new Error('Invalid post section ID provided'); } try { const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE); await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(id); return new StepResponse({ id }); } catch (error) { throw new Error(`Failed to delete post section: ${error.message}`); } } );🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post-section.ts around lines 8 to 14, the deletePostSectionStep function lacks error handling and input validation. Add validation to check if the id parameter is valid before proceeding. Wrap the service call in a try-catch block to catch and log errors, then return an appropriate error response or rethrow to ensure proper error reporting in the workflow.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/update-post.ts (2)
33-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling to rollback function.
The rollback function should handle potential errors gracefully to avoid masking the original error that triggered the rollback.
async (existingData, { container }) => { if (!existingData) return - const pageBuilderService = - container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) - - // Rollback to the previous state with only the updatable fields - await pageBuilderService.updatePosts(existingData) + try { + const pageBuilderService = + container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) + + // Rollback to the previous state with only the updatable fields + await pageBuilderService.updatePosts(existingData) + } catch (rollbackError) { + console.error('Failed to rollback post update:', rollbackError) + // Don't throw here to avoid masking the original error + } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async (existingData, { container }) => { if (!existingData) return try { const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) // Rollback to the previous state with only the updatable fields await pageBuilderService.updatePosts(existingData) } catch (rollbackError) { console.error('Failed to rollback post update:', rollbackError) // Don't throw here to avoid masking the original error } }, )🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/update-post.ts around lines 33 to 42, the rollback function lacks error handling, which could cause errors during rollback to mask the original error. Wrap the rollback logic in a try-catch block to catch and log any errors that occur during the rollback process without throwing them further, ensuring the original error remains visible and the rollback errors are handled gracefully.
25-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add safe navigation for relation mapping.
The relation mapping could fail if any of the related entities are null or undefined, causing the step to throw an error.
// relations - root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id ?? undefined, + root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id, featured_image_id: existingPost.featured_image?.id, - authors: existingPost.authors?.map((author) => author.id), - sections: existingPost.sections?.map((section) => section.id), - tags: existingPost.tags?.map((tag) => tag.id), + authors: existingPost.authors?.map((author) => author.id) ?? [], + sections: existingPost.sections?.map((section) => section.id) ?? [], + tags: existingPost.tags?.map((tag) => tag.id) ?? [],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// relations root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id, featured_image_id: existingPost.featured_image?.id, authors: existingPost.authors?.map((author) => author.id) ?? [], sections: existingPost.sections?.map((section) => section.id) ?? [], tags: existingPost.tags?.map((tag) => tag.id) ?? [], } as UpdatePostStepInput)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/update-post.ts around lines 25 to 31, the mapping of related entities like authors, sections, and tags does not safely handle null or undefined values, which can cause runtime errors. Update the code to use safe navigation (optional chaining) when accessing these arrays and their elements, ensuring that if any related entity or its properties are null or undefined, the mapping gracefully handles it without throwing errors.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/route.ts (2)
5-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for the query operation.
The GET handler lacks error handling for potential failures in the graph query operation. Consider wrapping the query in a try-catch block.
export const GET = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { + try { const query = req.scope.resolve('query'); const { data: posts, metadata = { count: 0, skip: 0, take: 0 } } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: req.filterableFields || {}, pagination: req.queryConfig?.pagination || { skip: 0, take: 10 }, }); res.status(200).json({ posts: posts, count: metadata.count, offset: metadata.skip, limit: metadata.take, }); + } catch (error) { + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to fetch posts' }); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const GET = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { try { const query = req.scope.resolve('query'); const { data: posts, metadata = { count: 0, skip: 0, take: 0 } } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: req.filterableFields || {}, pagination: req.queryConfig?.pagination || { skip: 0, take: 10 }, }); res.status(200).json({ posts: posts, count: metadata.count, offset: metadata.skip, limit: metadata.take, }); } catch (error) { res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to fetch posts' }); } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/route.ts between lines 5 and 21, the GET handler performs a graph query without error handling. Wrap the query and response logic inside a try-catch block to catch any errors during the query operation. In the catch block, respond with an appropriate error status code and message to handle failures gracefully.
23-31: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and HTTP status codes.
The POST handler should:
- Use 201 status code for successful creation
- Add error handling for workflow failures
export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest<AdminPageBuilderCreatePostBody>, res: MedusaResponse) => { + try { const { result } = await createPostWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { post: req.validatedBody, }, }); - res.status(200).json({ post: result }); + res.status(201).json({ post: result }); + } catch (error) { + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create post' }); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const POST = async ( req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest<AdminPageBuilderCreatePostBody>, res: MedusaResponse ) => { try { const { result } = await createPostWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { post: req.validatedBody, }, }); res.status(201).json({ post: result }); } catch (error) { res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create post' }); } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/route.ts around lines 23 to 31, the POST handler currently returns a 200 status code on success and lacks error handling. Update the success response to use HTTP status code 201 to indicate resource creation. Wrap the workflow execution in a try-catch block to handle potential errors, and respond with an appropriate error status code and message in the catch block to improve robustness.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/route.ts (2)
5-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Apply consistent error handling pattern.
The GET handler has the same error handling issue as the posts route. Consider implementing consistent error handling across all API routes.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/route.ts between lines 5 and 21, the GET handler lacks error handling, which can cause unhandled exceptions and inconsistent API responses. Wrap the existing logic in a try-catch block, and in the catch block, respond with an appropriate error status and message to ensure consistent error handling across all API routes.
23-31: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Replace type assertion with proper request typing and improve error handling.
The POST handler has several issues:
- Type assertion instead of proper typing:
req.validatedBody as CreatePostSectionStepInputsuggests missing request type definition- Missing error handling: No try-catch for workflow failures
- Incorrect HTTP status code: Should use 201 for creation
-export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { +export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest<CreatePostSectionStepInput>, res: MedusaResponse) => { + try { const { result } = await createPostSectionWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { - section: req.validatedBody as CreatePostSectionStepInput, + section: req.validatedBody, }, }); - res.status(200).json({ section: result }); + res.status(201).json({ section: result }); + } catch (error) { + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create post section' }); + } };
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's a proper type definition for post section creation requests ast-grep --pattern 'AdminPageBuilderCreatePostSectionBody'Length of output: 455
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash set -e # Locate CreatePostSectionStepInput definition or usage rg --color=never -n "CreatePostSectionStepInput" -A3 -B3 # Preview the top of the sections route handler sed -n '1,20p' apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/route.ts # Find AuthenticatedMedusaRequest type declaration rg --color=never -n "AuthenticatedMedusaRequest" -A5 -B0 # Preview the top of the posts route handler for consistency sed -n '1,20p' apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/route.tsLength of output: 15128
Refactor POST
/admin/content/sectionsto use proper typing, status code, and error handling– File:
apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/route.ts-export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { +export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest<CreatePostSectionStepInput>, res: MedusaResponse) => { + try { const { result } = await createPostSectionWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { - section: req.validatedBody as CreatePostSectionStepInput, + section: req.validatedBody, }, }); - res.status(200).json({ section: result }); + res.status(201).json({ section: result }); + } catch (error) { + res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create post section' }); + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const POST = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest<CreatePostSectionStepInput>, res: MedusaResponse) => { try { const { result } = await createPostSectionWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { section: req.validatedBody, }, }); res.status(201).json({ section: result }); } catch (error) { res.status(500).json({ error: 'Failed to create post section' }); } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/route.ts around lines 23 to 31, replace the type assertion on req.validatedBody with a properly typed request interface that includes the validated body type for section creation. Wrap the workflow call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully and respond with an appropriate error status and message. Change the success response status code from 200 to 201 to correctly indicate resource creation.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/SectionsSidebar.tsx (1)
61-80:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd click handlers for the dropdown menu items.
The dropdown menu items in
CreateSectionButtonare currently static and lack click handlers. Users can interact with these items but nothing will happen, creating a confusing user experience.Consider adding click handlers to the dropdown items:
- <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2">Full Width Layout</DropdownMenu.Item> + <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2" onClick={() => handleCreateSection('full-width')}> + Full Width Layout + </DropdownMenu.Item> - <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2">Two Column Layout</DropdownMenu.Item> + <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2" onClick={() => handleCreateSection('two-column')}> + Two Column Layout + </DropdownMenu.Item> - <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2">Grid Layout</DropdownMenu.Item> + <DropdownMenu.Item className="gap-x-2" onClick={() => handleCreateSection('grid')}> + Grid Layout + </DropdownMenu.Item>You'll also need to implement the
handleCreateSectionfunction that likely calls theuseAdminCreatePostSectionmutation hook mentioned in the AI summary.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/SectionsSidebar.tsx between lines 61 and 80, the dropdown menu items lack click handlers, making them non-functional. Add onClick handlers to each DropdownMenu.Item that call a new function handleCreateSection with the corresponding section type as an argument. Implement handleCreateSection to invoke the useAdminCreatePostSection mutation hook to create the selected section, ensuring the UI updates accordingly after creation.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FieldWrapper.tsx (2)
24-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address the type assertion safety concern.
The type assertion
as Tbypasses TypeScript's type checking, which could lead to runtime errors if the props don't actually match typeT.Consider using a more type-safe approach:
- {children({ ...props, name } as T)} + {children({ ...props, name })}If the type assertion is necessary, validate that the
FieldWrapperProps<T>type definition intypes.d.tsensures thatpropsandnameare compatible withT. Based on the relevant code snippet, the type definition extendsT, so this should work without the assertion.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{children({ ...props, name })}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FieldWrapper.tsx at line 24, avoid using the unsafe type assertion 'as T' on the children call. Instead, ensure that the FieldWrapperProps<T> type definition correctly extends or includes the properties required by T so that the spread of props and name naturally conforms to T. Remove the 'as T' assertion and adjust the types if needed to maintain type safety without bypassing TypeScript checks.
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove or justify the ESLint disable rule.
The blanket disable of
@typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignmentsuggests potential type safety issues. Consider addressing the underlying type problems rather than disabling the rule.If this disable is necessary due to the generic nature of the component, add a comment explaining why:
-/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment */ +/* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment */ +// Note: Disabled due to generic type spreading in children render prop📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./* eslint-disable @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment */ // Note: Disabled due to generic type spreading in children render prop🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FieldWrapper.tsx at line 1, the ESLint rule @typescript-eslint/no-unsafe-assignment is disabled globally, which can hide type safety issues. Review the code to identify and fix the underlying type problems causing unsafe assignments. If the disable is absolutely necessary due to the component's generic nature, replace the blanket disable with a specific inline comment explaining why it is required to maintain clarity and code quality.packages/page-builder-sdk/README.md (4)
51-51:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate all remaining package name references.
Several other locations still reference the incorrect package name and need to be updated for consistency.
-import { AdminProductReviewsResource } from '@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk'; +import { AdminProductReviewsResource } from '@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk'; -yarn yalc add @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk +yarn yalc add @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk - include: ['@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk'], + include: ['@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk'], - noExternal: ['@medusajs/js-sdk', '@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk'], + noExternal: ['@medusajs/js-sdk', '@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk'],Also applies to: 131-131, 147-147, 164-164
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/README.md at lines 51, 131, 147, and 164, update all references to the incorrect package name to the correct one '@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk' for consistency. Search for any outdated package names in these lines and replace them with the correct package name throughout the file.
10-10:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate installation instructions to match the correct package name.
The installation commands reference
@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdkbut should use the correct package name based on the directory structure.-yarn install @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk +yarn install @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk -yarn workspace my-app add @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk +yarn workspace my-app add @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdkAlso applies to: 13-13
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/README.md at lines 10 and 13, the installation command uses the incorrect package name @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk. Update these lines to use the correct package name that matches the directory structure of the package, ensuring the installation instructions are accurate.
1-1:
⚠️ Potential issueFix package name inconsistency.
The README is located in
packages/page-builder-sdk/but refers to@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdkin the title. This creates confusion about the actual package name.-# @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk +# @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.-# @lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk +# @lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/README.md at line 1, the package name in the title is incorrect and inconsistent with the directory name. Update the title to reflect the correct package name, which should match the folder name "page-builder-sdk" or the actual package name defined in the package.json for this directory, to avoid confusion.
21-38:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate usage example to reflect page builder functionality.
The current example imports and uses product review functionality (
StoreListProductReviewsQuery,sdk.store.productReviews.list()), which doesn't match the page builder SDK's purpose. This will confuse users about the SDK's actual capabilities.import { - MedusaPluginsSDK, - StoreListProductReviewsQuery, - StoreListProductReviewStatsQuery, -} from '@lambdacurry/medusa-plugins-sdk'; + PageBuilderSDK, + // Add appropriate page builder types here +} from '@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk'; // Initialize the SDK -const sdk = new MedusaPluginsSDK({ +const sdk = new PageBuilderSDK({ baseUrl: process.env.MEDUSA_BACKEND_URL || 'http://localhost:9000', publishableKey: process.env.MEDUSA_PUBLISHABLE_KEY, }); -// List product reviews -const productReviews = await sdk.store.productReviews.list({ - product_id: product.id, - offset: 0, - limit: 10, -}) +// Example page builder usage +const posts = await sdk.store.pageBuilder.listPosts({ + offset: 0, + limit: 10, +})📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { PageBuilderSDK, // Add appropriate page builder types here } from '@lambdacurry/page-builder-sdk'; // Initialize the SDK const sdk = new PageBuilderSDK({ baseUrl: process.env.MEDUSA_BACKEND_URL || 'http://localhost:9000', publishableKey: process.env.MEDUSA_PUBLISHABLE_KEY, }); // Example page builder usage const posts = await sdk.store.pageBuilder.listPosts({ offset: 0, limit: 10, });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/README.md around lines 21 to 38, the usage example incorrectly demonstrates product review functionality unrelated to the page builder SDK. Replace the import statements and example code to showcase the page builder SDK's actual features, such as creating or fetching pages or components, ensuring the example aligns with the SDK's purpose and avoids confusion.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/editor-sidebar-context.tsx (1)
10-15:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve interface naming conflict.
The
EditorSidebarContextTypeinterface name conflicts with identically named interfaces inSettingsSidebarContext.tsxandSectionsSidebarContext.tsx, but they have completely different shapes. This creates confusion and potential TypeScript conflicts.-export interface EditorSidebarContextType { +export interface PostEditorSidebarContextType { sections: SidebarState; settings: SidebarState; toggleLeft: (viewType: SidebarViewType) => void; toggleRight: (viewType: SidebarViewType) => void; }You'll also need to update the context creation:
-export const PostEditorContext = createContext<EditorSidebarContextType>({ +export const PostEditorContext = createContext<PostEditorSidebarContextType>({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// rename the interface export interface PostEditorSidebarContextType { sections: SidebarState; settings: SidebarState; toggleLeft: (viewType: SidebarViewType) => void; toggleRight: (viewType: SidebarViewType) => void; } // update the context creation to use the new interface export const PostEditorContext = createContext<PostEditorSidebarContextType>({ sections: { /* existing default state */ }, settings: { /* existing default state */ }, toggleLeft: () => {}, toggleRight: () => {}, })🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/editor-sidebar-context.tsx around lines 10 to 15, the interface name EditorSidebarContextType conflicts with other interfaces of the same name in related files but with different structures. Rename this interface to a unique, descriptive name that reflects its specific purpose in this file. Also update any references to this interface, including the context creation, to use the new name to avoid TypeScript conflicts and confusion.apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/post-sections-queries.ts (2)
29-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for empty results.
The hook should handle cases where no section is found with the given ID.
- return sections?.sections?.[0]; + const section = sections?.sections?.[0]; + if (!section) { + throw new Error(`Post section with ID ${id} not found`); + } + return section;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const section = sections?.sections?.[0]; if (!section) { throw new Error(`Post section with ID ${id} not found`); } return section;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/post-sections-queries.ts at line 29, the code returns the first section without checking if it exists, which can cause issues if no section is found. Add error handling to check if sections or sections.sections is empty or undefined before accessing the first element. If no section is found, return a suitable fallback value or throw an error to handle the empty result case gracefully.
25-27: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Fix incorrect API usage for fetching single post section.
The
useAdminFetchPostSectionhook incorrectly passes{ id }tolistPostSections, but theAdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuerytype doesn't include anidfield. This suggests you need a dedicated method for fetching by ID.- const sections = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPostSections({ - id, - } as AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery); + const section = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.getPostSection(id);Alternatively, if there's no dedicated
getPostSectionmethod, you might need to add one to the SDK or use a different approach like filtering on the client side.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if there's a getPostSection method available in the SDK # Search for post section related methods in the SDK rg -A 5 "getPostSection|fetchPostSection" --type tsLength of output: 53
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the type definition to see what fields AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery actually has rg -n "AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery" --type ts # Find where listPostSections is declared to inspect its parameters rg -n "listPostSections" -nLength of output: 1352
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # 1. Show the fields of the AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery type rg -A5 "export type AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery" packages/page-builder-types/src/admins.d.ts # 2. Inspect the listPostSections method signature in the SDK rg -n -A5 "async listPostSections" packages/page-builder-sdk/src/sdk/admin/admin-page-builder.tsLength of output: 591
Implement a dedicated SDK method for fetching a single post section
The
AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuerytype doesn’t includeid, so callingsdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPostSections({ id } as AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery)is invalid. You need a proper endpoint for
/admin/content/sections/:id.Files to update:
- packages/page-builder-sdk/src/sdk/admin/admin-page-builder.ts
- apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/post-sections-queries.ts (around lines 25–27)
Proposed diffs:
In
admin-page-builder.ts, add:+ async retrievePostSection( + id: string, + query?: { fields?: string[]; expand?: string[] } + ): Promise<AdminPageBuilderGetPostSectionResponse> { + return this.client.fetch<AdminPageBuilderGetPostSectionResponse>( + `/admin/content/sections/${id}`, + { method: 'GET', query } + ); + }In
post-sections-queries.ts, replace:- const sections = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPostSections({ - id, - } as AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery); - return sections[0]; + const section = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.retrievePostSection(id); + return section;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/post-sections-queries.ts around lines 25 to 27, the code incorrectly calls listPostSections with an id parameter, which is not supported by AdminPageBuilderListPostSectionsQuery. To fix this, implement a new SDK method in packages/page-builder-sdk/src/sdk/admin/admin-page-builder.ts that fetches a single post section by ID using the endpoint /admin/content/sections/:id. Then update the hook in post-sections-queries.ts to call this new method instead of listPostSections, passing the id directly to retrieve the specific post section.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/components/posts-data-table/use-post-data-table-columns.tsx (2)
68-69:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove @ts-ignore and fix typing issues.
The
@ts-ignorecomment indicates unresolved type issues that should be properly addressed rather than suppressed.- columnHelper.action({ - // @ts-ignore - actions: ({ row }) => [ + columnHelper.display({ + id: 'actions', + cell: ({ row }) => ( + <ActionMenu + groups={[Consider using
columnHelper.display()with a proper ActionMenu component instead of the deprecated action helper.Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/components/posts-data-table/use-post-data-table-columns.tsx at lines 68-69, remove the @ts-ignore comment and resolve the underlying TypeScript typing issues by properly typing the actions property. Replace the deprecated action helper with columnHelper.display() and implement a suitable ActionMenu component to handle row actions, ensuring all types align correctly without suppressing errors.
78-78:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove console.log statement.
Console logs should not be present in production code. Consider throwing an error or providing a more appropriate default behavior.
- } else { - console.log('edit', row.original.id); - } + } else { + throw new Error('Edit handler not provided'); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.} else { throw new Error('Edit handler not provided'); }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/components/posts-data-table/use-post-data-table-columns.tsx at line 78, remove the console.log statement that outputs 'edit' and the row ID. Replace it with appropriate error handling or a suitable default action if needed, ensuring no console logs remain in production code.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/[id]/route.ts (3)
26-36:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for missing sections.
The handler assumes a section exists but doesn't handle the case where
sections[0]is undefined, which could cause runtime errors.const { data: sections } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post_section', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: { id: req.params.id }, }); const section = sections[0]; + + if (!section) { + return res.status(404).json({ + error: 'Post section not found', + id: req.params.id + }); + } res.status(200).json({ section: section, });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const { data: sections } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post_section', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: { id: req.params.id }, }); const section = sections[0]; if (!section) { return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Post section not found', id: req.params.id, }); } res.status(200).json({ section: section, });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/[id]/route.ts around lines 26 to 36, the code assumes that sections[0] exists without checking, which can cause runtime errors if no section is found. Add a check after fetching sections to verify if sections[0] is defined; if not, respond with an appropriate error status (e.g., 404) and message indicating the section was not found. This will prevent runtime errors and provide clear feedback to the client.
39-49: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for workflow execution.
The DELETE handler should handle cases where the section doesn't exist or the workflow fails.
export const DELETE = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { const id = req.params.id; + try { const { result } = await deletePostSectionWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { id, }, }); res.status(200).json({ id: result.id, object: 'post_section', deleted: true }); + } catch (error) { + if (error.message?.includes('not found')) { + return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Post section not found', id }); + } + throw error; + } };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const DELETE = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { const id = req.params.id; try { const { result } = await deletePostSectionWorkflow(req.scope).run({ input: { id, }, }); res.status(200).json({ id: result.id, object: 'post_section', deleted: true }); } catch (error) { if (error.message?.includes('not found')) { return res.status(404).json({ error: 'Post section not found', id }); } throw error; } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/[id]/route.ts around lines 39 to 49, the DELETE handler lacks error handling for cases when the section does not exist or the workflow fails. Wrap the workflow execution in a try-catch block, catch any errors thrown during the deletePostSectionWorkflow.run call, and respond with an appropriate error status and message. Also, handle the case where the result is missing or invalid by returning a 404 or relevant error response.
9-12: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety for request body validation.
The type assertion
as UpdatePostSectionStepInputbypasses type checking and could lead to runtime errors if the validated body doesn't match the expected type.- const data: UpdatePostSectionStepInput = { - ...(req.validatedBody as UpdatePostSectionStepInput), - id, - }; + const validatedBody = req.validatedBody; + if (!validatedBody) { + return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid request body' }); + } + + const data: UpdatePostSectionStepInput = { + ...validatedBody, + id, + };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const validatedBody = req.validatedBody; if (!validatedBody) { return res.status(400).json({ error: 'Invalid request body' }); } const data: UpdatePostSectionStepInput = { ...validatedBody, id, };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/[id]/route.ts around lines 9 to 12, the code uses a type assertion to cast req.validatedBody to UpdatePostSectionStepInput, which bypasses type safety. To fix this, implement proper runtime validation or type guards to ensure req.validatedBody conforms to UpdatePostSectionStepInput before assignment, avoiding unsafe casting and preventing potential runtime errors.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/middlewares.ts (1)
8-8: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety for the blocks field.
Using
z.any()for theblocksfield defeats the purpose of schema validation and type safety. Consider defining a more specific schema for the blocks structure.- blocks: z.any().optional(), + blocks: z.array(z.record(z.string(), z.unknown())).optional(),Or better yet, define a proper schema for the block structure if you know the expected format.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// before - blocks: z.any().optional(), // after blocks: z.array(z.record(z.string(), z.unknown())).optional(),🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/sections/middlewares.ts at line 8, the blocks field is currently typed as z.any(), which bypasses schema validation and reduces type safety. Replace z.any() with a more specific Zod schema that matches the expected structure of blocks, such as an object or array schema with defined properties, to enforce validation and improve type safety.packages/page-builder-sdk/src/types/product-review-stats.ts (1)
32-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace any types with proper date types.
Using
anyfor date fields reduces type safety. Consider using more specific types for date range queries.- created_at?: any; - updated_at?: any; + created_at?: { + gte?: Date | string; + lte?: Date | string; + }; + updated_at?: { + gte?: Date | string; + lte?: Date | string; + };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export interface ProductReviewStats { average_rating?: number; review_count?: number; - created_at?: any; - updated_at?: any; + created_at?: { + gte?: Date | string; + lte?: Date | string; + }; + updated_at?: { + gte?: Date | string; + lte?: Date | string; + }; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/src/types/product-review-stats.ts at lines 32 to 33, replace the type 'any' for the fields 'created_at' and 'updated_at' with a more specific date type such as 'Date' or 'string' formatted as ISO date strings. This will improve type safety and better support date range queries by explicitly defining these fields as date-related types.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledCurrencyInput.tsx (2)
23-23: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Review type casting necessity.
The type casting on the
rulesprop might indicate a type mismatch. Consider whether this casting is necessary or if the types can be properly aligned.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are type definition issues with RegisterOptions ast-grep --pattern 'rules as Omit<RegisterOptions<$_, $_>, $_>'Length of output: 1281
Align
rulesprop types to eliminate type assertionsThe repeated
rules as Omit<RegisterOptions<T, Path<T>>, 'disabled' | 'valueAsNumber' | 'valueAsDate' | 'setValueAs'>casts indicate that the component props are declared too broadly and then being force-narrowed at every use. To restore full type safety and avoid theseashacks, update each Controlled*Field component’s props so that:rules?: Omit< RegisterOptions<T, Path<T>>, 'disabled' | 'valueAsNumber' | 'valueAsDate' | 'setValueAs' >and then remove the
ascast in the JSX.Affected locations:
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledCurrencyInput.tsx (line 23)
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledSelect.tsx (line 32)
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledSearchableSelect.tsx (line 23)
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledInput.tsx (line 28)
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledDatePicker.tsx (line 22)
- apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledCheckbox.tsx (line 27)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledCurrencyInput.tsx at line 23, the rules prop is being force-cast with 'as' to a narrowed type, indicating a type mismatch. To fix this, update the component's props definition so that the rules prop is explicitly typed as Omit<RegisterOptions<T, Path<T>>, 'disabled' | 'valueAsNumber' | 'valueAsDate' | 'setValueAs'>. After adjusting the prop type, remove the 'as' cast from the rules prop usage in the JSX to restore full type safety and eliminate the need for type assertions.
29-31:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove currency input sanitization logic.
The current regex
/[^0-9.-]+/gallows multiple decimal points and minus signs, which could result in invalid currency values like "12.34.56" or "--123".onChange={(e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { - field.onChange(e.target.value.replace(/[^0-9.-]+/g, '')); + const sanitizedValue = e.target.value + .replace(/[^0-9.-]/g, '') // Remove invalid characters + .replace(/^-+/, '-') // Keep only one leading minus + .replace(/-+/g, '-') // Remove multiple minuses + .replace(/\..*\./, match => match.slice(0, match.indexOf('.', 1))); // Keep only first decimal point + field.onChange(sanitizedValue); }}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.onChange={(e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { const sanitizedValue = e.target.value .replace(/[^0-9.-]/g, '') // Remove invalid characters .replace(/^-+/, '-') // Keep only one leading minus .replace(/-+/g, '-') // Remove multiple minuses .replace(/\..*\./, match => match.slice(0, match.indexOf('.', 1))); // Keep only first decimal point field.onChange(sanitizedValue); }}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/ControlledFields/ControlledCurrencyInput.tsx around lines 29 to 31, the current regex used to sanitize the currency input allows multiple decimal points and minus signs, leading to invalid values. Update the sanitization logic to ensure only one decimal point and one optional leading minus sign are allowed. This can be done by refining the regex or by implementing additional checks to prevent multiple occurrences of these characters before calling field.onChange.packages/page-builder-sdk/package.json (1)
11-11:
⚠️ Potential issueFix homepage URL mismatch.
The homepage URL points to "plugins-sdk" but this package is named "page-builder-sdk".
- "homepage": "https://github.com/lambda-curry/medusa-plugins/tree/main/packages/plugins-sdk", + "homepage": "https://github.com/lambda-curry/medusa-plugins/tree/main/packages/page-builder-sdk",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."homepage": "https://github.com/lambda-curry/medusa-plugins/tree/main/packages/page-builder-sdk",🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/package.json at line 11, the homepage URL incorrectly points to the "plugins-sdk" directory. Update the URL to reflect the correct package name by changing "plugins-sdk" to "page-builder-sdk" in the homepage field.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostContextProvider.tsx (2)
15-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Complete the buildDefaultValues function with all available post fields.
The function is missing several fields that are available in the Post type and defined in PostFormValues. This could lead to data loss when editing posts.
const buildDefaultValues = (post: Post): PostFormValues => { return { title: post.title ?? '', handle: post.handle ?? '', status: post.status ?? 'draft', - meta_title: '', - meta_description: '', - meta_image_url: '', + meta_title: post.meta_title ?? '', + meta_description: post.meta_description ?? '', + meta_image_url: post.meta_image_url ?? '', }; };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const buildDefaultValues = (post: Post): PostFormValues => { return { title: post.title ?? '', handle: post.handle ?? '', status: post.status ?? 'draft', meta_title: post.meta_title ?? '', meta_description: post.meta_description ?? '', meta_image_url: post.meta_image_url ?? '', }; };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostContextProvider.tsx around lines 15 to 24, the buildDefaultValues function only initializes a subset of the PostFormValues fields from the Post object. To prevent data loss when editing posts, update this function to include all fields defined in the PostFormValues type that correspond to properties on the Post object, ensuring each field is properly assigned from the post parameter or given a suitable default value.
55-68: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Complete the handleSubmit implementation and remove commented code.
The commented out fields suggest an incomplete implementation. Either implement these fields or remove the comments to avoid confusion.
const handleSubmit = async (data: PostFormValues) => { const updatedPost = await mutateAsync({ id: post?.id as string, data: { title: data.title, handle: data.handle, - // meta_title: data.meta_title, - // meta_description: data.meta_description, - // meta_image: data.meta_image, + meta_title: data.meta_title, + meta_description: data.meta_description, + meta_image_url: data.meta_image_url, }, }); form.reset(buildDefaultValues(updatedPost.post)); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const handleSubmit = async (data: PostFormValues) => { const updatedPost = await mutateAsync({ id: post?.id as string, data: { title: data.title, handle: data.handle, meta_title: data.meta_title, meta_description: data.meta_description, meta_image_url: data.meta_image_url, }, }); form.reset(buildDefaultValues(updatedPost.post)); };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostContextProvider.tsx between lines 55 and 68, the handleSubmit function has commented out fields for meta_title, meta_description, and meta_image, indicating incomplete implementation. To fix this, either fully implement these fields by including them in the data object passed to mutateAsync with appropriate values from the data parameter, or remove these commented lines entirely to avoid confusion and keep the code clean.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/SettingsSidebarContext.tsx (1)
12-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider renaming the interface to avoid naming conflicts.
Based on the relevant code snippets, there are multiple
EditorSidebarContextTypeinterfaces with different properties. This could lead to confusion and import conflicts.-export interface EditorSidebarContextType { +export interface SettingsSidebarContextType { isOpen: boolean; open: () => void; close: () => void; toggle: () => void; }And update the context and hook accordingly:
-export const SettingsSidebarContext = createContext<EditorSidebarContextType>({ +export const SettingsSidebarContext = createContext<SettingsSidebarContextType>({ isOpen: false, open: () => {}, close: () => {}, toggle: () => {}, });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/SettingsSidebarContext.tsx export interface SettingsSidebarContextType { isOpen: boolean; open: () => void; close: () => void; toggle: () => void; } export const SettingsSidebarContext = createContext<SettingsSidebarContextType>({ isOpen: false, open: () => {}, close: () => {}, toggle: () => {}, });🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/SettingsSidebarContext.tsx around lines 12 to 17, rename the interface EditorSidebarContextType to a more specific and unique name to avoid conflicts with other interfaces of the same name. After renaming the interface, update all references to this interface in the context and any related hooks to use the new name consistently.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/[id]/route.ts (1)
20-34:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd null check for post existence in GET handler.
The GET handler accesses
posts[0]without verifying that the array contains any results, which could cause a runtime error if no post is found with the given ID.Apply this diff to add proper error handling:
export const GET = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { const query = req.scope.resolve('query'); const { data: posts } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: { id: req.params.id }, }); + if (!posts || posts.length === 0) { + return res.status(404).json({ + message: `Post with id ${req.params.id} not found`, + }); + } + const post = posts[0]; res.status(200).json({ post: post, }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const GET = async (req: AuthenticatedMedusaRequest, res: MedusaResponse) => { const query = req.scope.resolve('query'); const { data: posts } = await query.graph({ entity: 'post', fields: req.queryConfig?.fields || ['*'], filters: { id: req.params.id }, }); if (!posts || posts.length === 0) { return res.status(404).json({ message: `Post with id ${req.params.id} not found`, }); } const post = posts[0]; res.status(200).json({ post: post, }); };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/posts/[id]/route.ts between lines 20 and 34, the GET handler accesses posts[0] without checking if posts array is empty, risking runtime errors. Add a null check after retrieving posts to verify if posts[0] exists; if not, respond with a 404 status and an appropriate error message. This ensures the handler gracefully handles cases where no post matches the given ID.apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/models/post.ts (1)
23-24:
⚠️ Potential issueUse proper datetime field types for timestamp fields.
The
published_atandarchived_atfields are defined astext()but should usedateTime()since they represent timestamps.Apply this diff to fix the field types:
- published_at: model.text().nullable(), - archived_at: model.text().nullable(), + published_at: model.dateTime().nullable(), + archived_at: model.dateTime().nullable(),🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/models/post.ts at lines 23 to 24, the fields published_at and archived_at are incorrectly defined as text() but should be dateTime() to properly represent timestamps. Change the field types from model.text().nullable() to model.dateTime().nullable() for both published_at and archived_at.apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/Migration20250528213548.ts (1)
12-12: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Consider adding a default value for the NOT NULL blocks column.
Adding a NOT NULL column without a default value could cause the migration to fail if there are existing records in the
page_builder_post_sectiontable.Consider this safer approach:
-alter table if exists "page_builder_post_section" add column if not exists "layout" text check ("layout" in ('full_width', 'two_column', 'grid')) not null default 'full_width', add column if not exists "blocks" jsonb not null; +alter table if exists "page_builder_post_section" add column if not exists "layout" text check ("layout" in ('full_width', 'two_column', 'grid')) not null default 'full_width', add column if not exists "blocks" jsonb not null default '[]'::jsonb;Let me verify if there are existing records that could be affected:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any existing post section records that could be affected rg -A 5 -B 5 "page_builder_post_section" --type sqlLength of output: 200
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash echo "Migration files in page-builder module:" ls -1 apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations | sort echo "" echo "Search for creation of page_builder_post_section:" rg -n 'create table.*"page_builder_post_section"' -t ts echo "" echo "Search for any inserts into page_builder_post_section:" rg -n 'insert into.*"page_builder_post_section"' -t tsLength of output: 1471
Ensure the new
blockscolumn has a safe defaultAdding a NOT NULL column without a default will break the migration if the table ever contains rows. We didn’t find any inserts in the migrations themselves, but existing or seeded data could still trigger this.
File:
- apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/Migration20250528213548.ts
Suggested change:
- alter table if exists "page_builder_post_section" - add column if not exists "layout" text - check ("layout" in ('full_width', 'two_column', 'grid')) not null default 'full_width', - add column if not exists "blocks" jsonb not null; + alter table if exists "page_builder_post_section" + add column if not exists "layout" text + check ("layout" in ('full_width', 'two_column', 'grid')) not null default 'full_width', + add column if not exists "blocks" jsonb not null default '[]'::jsonb;Please update the migration to include
default '[]'::jsonbor explicitly backfill existing rows before enforcing NOT NULL.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.this.addSql(`alter table if exists "page_builder_post_section" add column if not exists "layout" text check ("layout" in ('full_width', 'two_column', 'grid')) not null default 'full_width', add column if not exists "blocks" jsonb not null default '[]'::jsonb;`);🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/Migration20250528213548.ts at line 12, the migration adds a NOT NULL "blocks" column without a default value, which can cause failures if existing rows are present. To fix this, update the migration SQL to include a default value for the "blocks" column, such as default '[]'::jsonb, ensuring the column is safely added without breaking existing data.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/header.tsx (1)
45-55:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect link handling in button action.
The current implementation renders a
Linkcomponent inside theButtonbut doesn't properly integrate it. This won't work as expected for navigation.Apply this diff to fix the link integration:
{action.type === "button" && ( + <> + {action.link ? ( + <Link {...action.link}> + <Button + {...action.props} + size={action.props.size || "small"} + > + {action.props.children} + </Button> + </Link> + ) : ( + <Button + {...action.props} + size={action.props.size || "small"} + > + {action.props.children} + </Button> + )} + </> - <Button - {...action.props} - size={action.props.size || "small"} - > - <> - {action.props.children} - {action.link && <Link {...action.link} />} - </> - </Button> )}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{action.type === "button" && ( <> {action.link ? ( <Link {...action.link}> <Button {...action.props} size={action.props.size || "small"} > {action.props.children} </Button> </Link> ) : ( <Button {...action.props} size={action.props.size || "small"} > {action.props.children} </Button> )} </> )}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/header.tsx around lines 45 to 55, the Link component is incorrectly rendered inside the Button, which breaks navigation behavior. To fix this, replace the Button with the Link component when action.link is present, passing the button props to Link for proper navigation. If action.link is not present, render the Button as usual. This ensures correct link handling and navigation.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post.ts (2)
31-43: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding validation for required fields in rollback.
The rollback logic reconstructs the post without validating that required fields are present. This could lead to creation failures during rollback if the original post data is incomplete.
Consider adding validation before attempting to recreate the post:
const createPostInput: { id: string sections?: string[] } & CreatePostStepInput = { ...existingPost, // relations root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id ?? undefined, featured_image_id: existingPost.featured_image?.id, authors: existingPost.authors?.map((author) => author.id), sections: existingPost.sections?.map((section) => section.id), tags: existingPost.tags?.map((tag) => tag.id), } +// Validate required fields before attempting restoration +if (!createPostInput.title || !createPostInput.handle) { + throw new Error('Cannot restore post: missing required fields') +} const restoredPost = await pageBuilderService.createPosts(createPostInput)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const createPostInput: { id: string sections?: string[] } & CreatePostStepInput = { ...existingPost, // relations root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id ?? undefined, featured_image_id: existingPost.featured_image?.id, authors: existingPost.authors?.map((author) => author.id), sections: existingPost.sections?.map((section) => section.id), tags: existingPost.tags?.map((tag) => tag.id), } // Validate required fields before attempting restoration if (!createPostInput.title || !createPostInput.handle) { throw new Error('Cannot restore post: missing required fields') } const restoredPost = await pageBuilderService.createPosts(createPostInput)🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post.ts between lines 31 and 43, the rollback logic reconstructs the post without validating required fields, risking creation failures if data is incomplete. Add validation checks for all required fields in createPostInput before attempting to recreate the post, and handle missing or invalid data appropriately to prevent errors during rollback.
38-38: 💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Potential issue with nested root access in rollback logic.
The rollback logic accesses
existingPost.root?.root?.idwhich suggests a double nesting that may not be correct. This could lead to undefined values being passed to the restoration.Please verify the correct structure of the root relationship. The following script will help identify the correct property path:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the Post model structure and root relationship ast-grep --pattern 'class PostModel { $$$ root: $_ $$$ }' # Also check for any root property definitions in types rg -A 3 "root.*:" --type tsLength of output: 6009
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Display context around the `root` relation in PostModel rg -n "root:" -C 5 apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/models/post.tsLength of output: 377
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Show delete-post workflow step with context sed -n '1,200p' apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post.tsLength of output: 1710
Fix incorrect nested
rootaccess in rollbackThe rollback is currently using
existingPost.root?.root?.id, which looks up the parent’s parent and will beundefinedunless you’ve eager-loaded two levels ofroot. You should reference the immediate parent’s ID instead:• In
apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post.ts, update the rollback block:- root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id ?? undefined, + root_id: existingPost.root?.id ?? undefined,• A similar change is needed in
apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/update-post.tswhere you also haveexistingPost.root?.root?.id. Replace it withexistingPost.root?.id.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// …rollback context… - root_id: existingPost.root?.root?.id ?? undefined, + root_id: existingPost.root?.id ?? undefined, // …more rollback fields…🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/delete-post.ts at line 38, the rollback logic incorrectly accesses existingPost.root?.root?.id, which assumes a double nested root relationship that is likely incorrect. To fix this, update the code to reference only the immediate parent's ID by changing existingPost.root?.root?.id to existingPost.root?.id. Also, apply the same fix in apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/update-post.ts where a similar nested root access occurs.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostDetailsForm.tsx (1)
25-25: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
File upload state is not integrated with form.
The
imageFilestate is managed separately from the form state, which could lead to inconsistencies. The selected file is not being saved with the form submission.Consider integrating the file upload with the form state:
- const [imageFile, setImageFile] = useState<File | null>(null); + const imageFile = form.watch('featured_image_file');And update the FileUpload component:
<FileUpload filetypes={['image/png', 'image/jpeg', 'image/jpg', 'image/webp']} - onFileChosen={(files: File[]) => setImageFile(files[0] || null)} + onFileChosen={(files: File[]) => form.setValue('featured_image_file', files[0] || null, { shouldDirty: true })} placeholder="Images can be up to 10MB each, for products we recommend a 1:1 aspect ratio." text={ <span> Drop your image here, or <span className="text-violet-60">click to browse</span> </span> } multiple={false} />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Replace separate imageFile state with form-managed value - const [imageFile, setImageFile] = useState<File | null>(null); + const imageFile = form.watch('featured_image_file'); /* … later in JSX … */ <FileUpload filetypes={['image/png', 'image/jpeg', 'image/jpg', 'image/webp']} - onFileChosen={(files: File[]) => setImageFile(files[0] || null)} + onFileChosen={(files: File[]) => + form.setValue('featured_image_file', files[0] || null, { shouldDirty: true }) + } placeholder="Images can be up to 10MB each, for products we recommend a 1:1 aspect ratio." text={ <span> Drop your image here, or <span className="text-violet-60">click to browse</span> </span> } multiple={false} />🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/PostDetailsForm.tsx at line 25, the imageFile state is managed separately from the form state, causing the uploaded file to not be included in form submissions. To fix this, integrate the imageFile into the form's state management by adding it as a form field. Update the form initialization to include the file field and modify the FileUpload component to update this form field instead of using a separate state variable.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FileUpload.tsx (1)
69-73:
⚠️ Potential issueFile validation logic may be too restrictive.
The current logic only accepts exactly one file (
files.length === 1) and shows an error otherwise. This doesn't handle themultipleprop correctly - when multiple files are allowed, more than one file should be acceptable.Fix the validation logic to respect the
multipleprop:- if (files.length === 1) { + if (files.length > 0 && (!multiple ? files.length === 1 : true)) { onFileChosen(files); } else { setUploadError(true); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (files.length > 0 && (!multiple ? files.length === 1 : true)) { onFileChosen(files); } else { setUploadError(true); }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FileUpload.tsx around lines 69 to 73, the file validation logic incorrectly restricts file selection to exactly one file regardless of the multiple prop. Update the condition to check if multiple files are allowed by the multiple prop; if multiple is true, accept any number of files greater than zero, otherwise accept exactly one file. Adjust the error handling to trigger only when the selected files do not meet these criteria.apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/duplicate-post-relations.ts (2)
35-46: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant field assignment in section creation.
Setting both
postandpost_idin the section creation data is redundant and could potentially cause issues depending on how the service handles these fields.const sectionsToCreate: SectionInput[] = originalPost.sections.map( (section) => ({ ...section, id: undefined, post_template: undefined, post_template_id: undefined, - - // Set the new post relation - post: newPost.id, post_id: newPost.id, }), )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const sectionsToCreate: SectionInput[] = originalPost.sections.map( (section) => ({ ...section, id: undefined, post_template: undefined, post_template_id: undefined, post_id: newPost.id, }), )🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/duplicate-post-relations.ts between lines 35 and 46, remove the redundant assignment of both 'post' and 'post_id' fields when creating sections. Keep only one of these fields, preferably 'post_id', to avoid potential conflicts or issues in how the service processes the section creation data.
70-82:
⚠️ Potential issueIncomplete rollback implementation.
The rollback function only deletes the newly created sections but doesn't revert the other relation updates (featured_image, authors, tags) applied to the new post. This could leave the new post in an inconsistent state if the workflow fails after the relations are updated.
Consider implementing a complete rollback that reverts all relation updates:
async (data, { container }) => { if (!data?.relationsUpdated) return const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) const { sections, featured_image, authors, tags } = data.relationsUpdated if (sections?.length) { await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(sections) } + + // Revert the post relations to their original state + await pageBuilderService.updatePosts({ + id: data.newId, // You'll need to pass newId in the compensation data + sections: [], + featured_image: null, + authors: [], + tags: [], + }) },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.async (data, { container }) => { if (!data?.relationsUpdated) return const pageBuilderService = container.resolve<PageBuilderService>(PAGE_BUILDER_MODULE) const { sections, featured_image, authors, tags } = data.relationsUpdated if (sections?.length) { await pageBuilderService.deletePostSections(sections) } // Revert the post relations to their original state await pageBuilderService.updatePosts({ id: data.newId, // You'll need to pass newId in the compensation data sections: [], featured_image: null, authors: [], tags: [], }) }, )🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/workflows/steps/duplicate-post-relations.ts around lines 70 to 82, the rollback function currently only deletes the newly created sections but does not revert changes to featured_image, authors, and tags. To fix this, extend the rollback logic to also undo updates to featured_image, authors, and tags by calling the appropriate service methods or database operations that remove or reset these relations to their previous state, ensuring the new post is fully reverted to its original condition if the workflow fails.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/action-menu.tsx (1)
49-50: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use stable keys instead of array indices.
Using array indices as keys can cause React rendering issues if the order of actions changes, potentially leading to incorrect component state or unnecessary re-renders.
Consider using a more stable key:
<DropdownMenu.Group key={index}> - {group.actions.map((action, index) => { + {group.actions.map((action, actionIndex) => { if (action.onClick) { return ( <DropdownMenu.Item disabled={action.disabled} - key={index} + key={`${action.label}-${actionIndex}`}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<DropdownMenu.Group key={index}> {group.actions.map((action, actionIndex) => { if (action.onClick) { return ( <DropdownMenu.Item disabled={action.disabled} key={`${action.label}-${actionIndex}`}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/action-menu.tsx around lines 49 to 50, replace the use of array indices as keys in the DropdownMenu.Group and the mapped actions. Instead of using the index, use a unique and stable identifier from the group or action objects, such as an id or a unique name property, to ensure consistent keys and prevent React rendering issues.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/SectionsSidebarContext.tsx (1)
19-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate interface definition.
The
EditorSidebarContextTypeinterface is identical to the one defined inSettingsSidebarContext.tsx(lines 12-17). This creates code duplication and potential maintenance issues.Create a shared interface in a common types file or import it from the existing location:
+ import { EditorSidebarContextType } from './SettingsSidebarContext'; + - export interface EditorSidebarContextType { - isOpen: boolean; - open: () => void; - close: () => void; - toggle: () => void; - }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/editor/providers/SectionsSidebarContext.tsx around lines 19 to 24, the EditorSidebarContextType interface is duplicated from SettingsSidebarContext.tsx. To fix this, remove the interface definition here and instead import the EditorSidebarContextType interface from the existing file or a shared types file to avoid duplication and improve maintainability.apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/posts-queries.ts (1)
21-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix the fetch post implementation to use dedicated endpoint.
The current implementation uses
listPostswith an ID filter and assumes the first result, which is inefficient and potentially unreliable. This pattern suggests there should be a dedicatedgetPostorfetchPostmethod in the SDK.export const useAdminFetchPost = (id: string) => { return useQuery<Post>({ queryKey: [...QUERY_KEY, id], queryFn: async () => { - const post = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPosts({ - id, - } as AdminPageBuilderListPostsQuery); - - return post?.posts?.[0]; + return sdk.admin.pageBuilder.getPost(id); }, }); };Alternatively, if a dedicated endpoint doesn't exist, add proper error handling:
export const useAdminFetchPost = (id: string) => { return useQuery<Post>({ queryKey: [...QUERY_KEY, id], queryFn: async () => { const post = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPosts({ id, } as AdminPageBuilderListPostsQuery); - return post?.posts?.[0]; + const foundPost = post?.posts?.[0]; + if (!foundPost) { + throw new Error(`Post with id ${id} not found`); + } + return foundPost; }, }); };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export const useAdminFetchPost = (id: string) => { return useQuery<Post>({ queryKey: [...QUERY_KEY, id], queryFn: async () => { return sdk.admin.pageBuilder.getPost(id); }, }); };export const useAdminFetchPost = (id: string) => { return useQuery<Post>({ queryKey: [...QUERY_KEY, id], queryFn: async () => { const post = await sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPosts({ id, } as AdminPageBuilderListPostsQuery); const foundPost = post?.posts?.[0]; if (!foundPost) { throw new Error(`Post with id ${id} not found`); } return foundPost; }, }); };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/hooks/posts-queries.ts between lines 21 and 32, replace the use of sdk.admin.pageBuilder.listPosts with a dedicated method like sdk.admin.pageBuilder.getPost or fetchPost that directly fetches a post by ID. If such a method does not exist, implement error handling to manage cases where the post is not found or the response is empty, instead of assuming the first post in the list is the correct one.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FieldCheckbox.tsx (1)
25-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix checkbox event handling - remove redundant onChange.
The
MedusaCheckboxhas bothonChange(which does nothing) andonCheckedChangehandlers. The emptyonChangehandler is unnecessary and potentially confusing.<MedusaCheckbox {...fieldProps} ref={ref} checked={props.checked} - onChange={(e) => {}} onCheckedChange={(checked) => { onChange?.(checked); }} />📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<MedusaCheckbox {...fieldProps} ref={ref} checked={props.checked} onCheckedChange={(checked) => { onChange?.(checked); }} />🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/FieldCheckbox.tsx between lines 25 and 33, remove the empty onChange handler from the MedusaCheckbox component since it does nothing and is redundant. Keep only the onCheckedChange handler to handle checkbox state changes properly.apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/EditorModal.tsx (1)
37-42:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve commented out close functionality.
The EditorModalClose component is commented out but still referenced in the export object, which could cause runtime errors.
Either remove the reference or uncomment the implementation:
const EditorModal = Object.assign(EditorModalRoot, { Trigger: EditorModalTrigger, Title: EditorModalTitle, Description: EditorModalDescription, Content: EditorModalContent, Header: EditorModalHeader, Body: EditorModalBody, - // Close: EditorModalClose, Footer: EditorModalFooter, })Or implement the close component:
-// /** -// * This component is used to create the close button for the modal. -// * It accepts props from the [Radix UI Dialog Close](https://www.radix-ui.com/primitives/docs/components/dialog#close) component. -// */ -// const EditorModalClose = RadixDialog.Close -// EditorModalClose.displayName = "EditorModal.Close" +/** + * This component is used to create the close button for the modal. + * It accepts props from the [Radix UI Dialog Close](https://www.radix-ui.com/primitives/docs/components/dialog#close) component. + */ +const EditorModalClose = RadixDialog.Close +EditorModalClose.displayName = "EditorModal.Close"Also applies to: 202-202
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/editor/components/editor/EditorModal.tsx around lines 37 to 42 and line 202, the EditorModalClose component is commented out but still referenced in the export object, which will cause runtime errors. To fix this, either uncomment the EditorModalClose component implementation so it is properly defined or remove its reference from the export object if it is not needed. Ensure the close button component is correctly implemented and exported if used.apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/types.d.ts (2)
6-6:
⚠️ Potential issueFix missing ReactNode import.
The
ReactNodetype is used but not imported, which will cause a TypeScript error.The type is referenced in the
BasicFieldPropsinterface but not imported from React.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/types.d.ts at line 6, the ReactNode type is used but not imported, causing a TypeScript error. Fix this by adding an import statement for ReactNode from the 'react' package at the top of the file.
115-129:
⚠️ Potential issueFix SelectProps interface definition.
The
SelectPropsinterface extendsReact.ComponentPropsWithRefbut doesn't specify the element type parameter, which will cause TypeScript errors.-interface SelectProps extends React.ComponentPropsWithRef { +interface SelectProps extends React.ComponentPropsWithRef<'select'> {Alternatively, if this should support multiple element types, specify the exact props:
-interface SelectProps extends React.ComponentPropsWithRef { +interface SelectProps { + ref?: React.Ref<HTMLSelectElement>;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.interface SelectProps extends React.ComponentPropsWithRef<'select'> { size?: 'base' | 'small'; children?: React.ReactNode; value?: string; defaultValue?: string; onValueChange?(value: string): void; open?: boolean; defaultOpen?: boolean; onOpenChange?(open: boolean): void; dir?: Direction; name?: string; autoComplete?: string; disabled?: boolean; required?: boolean; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/components/inputs/Field/types.d.ts around lines 115 to 129, the SelectProps interface extends React.ComponentPropsWithRef without specifying the element type parameter, causing TypeScript errors. Fix this by providing the appropriate HTML element type parameter to React.ComponentPropsWithRef, such as React.ComponentPropsWithRef<'select'>, to correctly type the props for a select element.apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/components/posts-data-table/use-post-table-query.tsx (1)
113-116:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for JSON.parse operations.
The JSON.parse calls could throw runtime errors if the query parameters contain invalid JSON, which would break the entire component.
Wrap the JSON.parse calls in try-catch blocks or use a safe JSON parsing utility:
- published_at: published_at ? JSON.parse(published_at) : undefined, - archived_at: archived_at ? JSON.parse(archived_at) : undefined, - created_at: created_at ? JSON.parse(created_at) : undefined, - updated_at: updated_at ? JSON.parse(updated_at) : undefined, + published_at: published_at ? safeJsonParse(published_at) : undefined, + archived_at: archived_at ? safeJsonParse(archived_at) : undefined, + created_at: created_at ? safeJsonParse(created_at) : undefined, + updated_at: updated_at ? safeJsonParse(updated_at) : undefined,Add a helper function:
const safeJsonParse = (str: string) => { try { return JSON.parse(str); } catch { return undefined; } };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/admin/routes/content/components/posts-data-table/use-post-table-query.tsx around lines 113 to 116, the JSON.parse calls on query parameters can throw runtime errors if the input is invalid JSON. To fix this, create a helper function that safely parses JSON strings by wrapping JSON.parse in a try-catch block and returning undefined on failure. Replace the direct JSON.parse calls with this safe parsing function to prevent the component from breaking due to malformed JSON.apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/validations.ts (2)
42-42: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Address TypeScript ignore comments.
Multiple
@ts-ignorecomments indicate unresolved type issues that could cause problems in the future.Instead of ignoring TypeScript errors, investigate and fix the root causes:
- For line 42: Check why the merge operation causes type issues
- For lines 52-59: Investigate why
createOperatorMap()return type is incompatibleConsider these approaches:
- Use proper type assertions with
asinstead of@ts-ignore- Define proper interfaces for the merged types
- Check if the imported utilities have correct type definitions
// Example of proper typing approach: const querySchema = createFindParams({ offset: 0, limit: 50, }).merge( z.object({ // ... fields created_at: createOperatorMap() as z.ZodOptional<z.ZodType<OperatorMap>>, }) );Also applies to: 52-59
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/validations.ts at line 42 and lines 52-59, the use of @ts-ignore comments hides underlying TypeScript type errors related to the merge operation and the return type of createOperatorMap(). To fix this, remove the @ts-ignore comments and address the type mismatches by defining or refining the interfaces involved, ensuring the imported utilities have accurate type definitions, and applying explicit type assertions such as using 'as' with the appropriate Zod types instead of ignoring errors. This will resolve the type conflicts properly and maintain type safety.
32-32:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove type assertion and fix underlying type issues.
Same issue as above - the
as anyassertion should be removed and the underlying type issue should be addressed.-}) as any; +});📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.});🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/api/admin/content/validations.ts at line 32, remove the 'as any' type assertion and instead resolve the underlying type mismatch causing the need for this assertion. Review the types involved in the expression or function return and adjust them to be compatible without forcing 'any' casting.packages/page-builder-types/src/models.d.ts (2)
8-11:
⚠️ Potential issue
updated_atshould be nullable, notundefinedBackend timestamps are typically stored as
NULLuntil the first update.
Usingstring | undefinedmakes it impossible to represent a persisted record that has explicitlynullin the DB and forces downstream code to handle two “empty” states (undefinedandnull).- updated_at: string | undefined; + updated_at: string | null;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-types/src/models.d.ts around lines 8 to 11, change the type of the updated_at field from string | undefined to string | null to correctly represent nullable timestamps from the backend. This ensures the field can explicitly hold null values instead of undefined, aligning with typical database behavior and simplifying downstream handling.
60-69: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
PostSectionfield names are out-of-sync with DB schemaThe migration introduces columns
content,settings,styles, andsort_order, whereas the type declares:data?: Record<string, unknown>; order: number;This mismatch will surface as runtime casting errors when the SDK deserialises API responses.
-export interface PostSection extends Base { - name: string; - data?: Record<string, unknown>; - order: number; +export interface PostSection extends Base { + name: string; + content: Record<string, unknown>; + settings: Record<string, unknown>; + styles?: Record<string, unknown>; + sort_order: number;Aligning the names keeps the compiler—not reviewers—catching these regressions.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export interface PostSection extends Base { name: string; content: Record<string, unknown>; settings: Record<string, unknown>; styles?: Record<string, unknown>; sort_order: number; post_id?: string; post?: Post; parent_section_id?: string; parent_section?: PostSection; child_sections?: PostSection[]; }🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-types/src/models.d.ts around lines 60 to 69, the PostSection interface uses field names 'data' and 'order' which do not match the database schema columns 'content', 'settings', 'styles', and 'sort_order'. To fix this, rename 'data' to 'content', add 'settings' and 'styles' fields with appropriate types, and rename 'order' to 'sort_order' to align the interface with the DB schema and prevent runtime casting errors.apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/Migration20250521141500.ts (1)
19-22:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing FK from
post_author.medusa_user_idto the coreusertable
medusa_user_idis declaredUNIQUEbut not foreign-keyed.
Adding the FK gives referential integrity and enables ON DELETE behaviour that
mirrors user-deletion workflows.ALTER TABLE page_builder_post_author ADD CONSTRAINT fk_post_author_user FOREIGN KEY (medusa_user_id) REFERENCES "user"(id) ON UPDATE CASCADE ON DELETE SET NULL;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/Migration20250521141500.ts around lines 19 to 22, the medusa_user_id column in the page_builder_post_author table is unique but lacks a foreign key constraint to the core user table. To fix this, add a foreign key constraint on medusa_user_id referencing user(id) with ON UPDATE CASCADE and ON DELETE SET NULL actions. This ensures referential integrity and aligns deletion behavior with user workflows.packages/page-builder-types/src/admins.d.ts (1)
11-32: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce reliance on
any& tighten query paramsSeveral filters are typed as
any, defeating the purpose of adding
declarations. Most of these are ISO date strings; others—such asfieldsand
order—have well-known formats.- // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: medusa infered type - published_at?: any; + published_at?: string | { gt?: string; lt?: string }; - fields?: string; + fields?: string[]; // aligns with Medusa core patterns - order?: string; + order?: `${string}|${'asc'|'desc'}`;Replacing
anyimproves autocomplete in consumers and prevents silent
contract drift.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.export type AdminPageBuilderListPostsQuery = { offset?: number; limit?: number; q?: string; id?: string | string[]; title?: string; handle?: string; status?: PostStatus | PostStatus[]; type?: PostType | PostType[]; content_mode?: PostContentMode | PostContentMode[]; is_home_page?: boolean; published_at?: string | { gt?: string; lt?: string }; // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: medusa infered type archived_at?: any; // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: medusa infered type created_at?: any; // biome-ignore lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny: medusa infered type updated_at?: any; order?: `${string}|${'asc'|'desc'}`; fields?: string[]; // aligns with Medusa core patterns };🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-types/src/admins.d.ts between lines 11 and 32, the properties published_at, archived_at, created_at, and updated_at are typed as any, which reduces type safety and autocomplete support. Replace these any types with more specific types such as string to represent ISO date strings. Additionally, refine the types of fields and order to their known formats, for example, using string literals or enums if applicable, to improve type accuracy and developer experience.packages/page-builder-sdk/src/types/product-reviews.ts (1)
75-76:
⚠️ Potential issueReplace
anytypes with proper type definitions.The
created_atandupdated_atfields are typed asany, which defeats the purpose of TypeScript's type safety. These should be properly typed as date strings or Date objects.- created_at?: any; - updated_at?: any; + created_at?: string; + updated_at?: string;🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/page-builder-sdk/src/types/product-reviews.ts at lines 75 to 76, the fields created_at and updated_at are currently typed as any, which reduces type safety. Replace the any type with a more specific type such as string (for ISO date strings) or Date, depending on how these fields are used in the codebase, to ensure proper type checking and clarity.apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/.snapshot-page-builder.json (1)
245-261:
⚠️ Potential issueInconsistent timestamp field types detected.
The
published_atandarchived_atfields are defined astexttype while other timestamp fields (created_at,updated_at,deleted_at) consistently usetimestamptz. This inconsistency could lead to issues with date handling and timezone management.Consider updating these fields to use
timestamptzfor consistency:"published_at": { "name": "published_at", - "type": "text", + "type": "timestamptz", "unsigned": false, "autoincrement": false, "primary": false, "nullable": true, - "mappedType": "text" + "length": 6, + "mappedType": "datetime" }, "archived_at": { "name": "archived_at", - "type": "text", + "type": "timestamptz", "unsigned": false, "autoincrement": false, "primary": false, "nullable": true, - "mappedType": "text" + "length": 6, + "mappedType": "datetime" },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."published_at": { "name": "published_at", "type": "timestamptz", "unsigned": false, "autoincrement": false, "primary": false, "nullable": true, "length": 6, "mappedType": "datetime" }, "archived_at": { "name": "archived_at", "type": "timestamptz", "unsigned": false, "autoincrement": false, "primary": false, "nullable": true, "length": 6, "mappedType": "datetime" },🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In apps/medusa/src/modules/page-builder/migrations/.snapshot-page-builder.json around lines 245 to 261, the fields published_at and archived_at are defined as text type, which is inconsistent with other timestamp fields like created_at, updated_at, and deleted_at that use timestamptz. To fix this, update the type and mappedType of published_at and archived_at fields from text to timestamptz to ensure consistent handling of timestamps and timezones across the schema.
…tarter into post-section-apis
…ment - Add medusa-backend.mdc with API, module, and workflow patterns - Add medusa-admin.mdc with React component and UI patterns - Update typescript-patterns.mdc with comprehensive type safety rules - Add comprehensive README.md for cursor rules organization - Separate backend and admin development concerns as requested - Follow Lambda Curry cursor rules best practices guide - Based on architecture patterns from PR #65
- Add centralized query key management patterns - Implement comprehensive verification checklists for backend and admin - Add file organization best practices and structure guidelines - Include targeted anti-pattern examples with code snippets - Enhance testing patterns for workflows and components - Focus on practical, actionable guidance without excessive length Based on Lambda Curry best practices guide recommendations
…rovements-1748537177
- Integrated @dnd-kit for drag-and-drop reordering of post sections in the admin UI - Updated post section API to handle sorting order changes - Added new dependencies for drag-and-drop capabilities - Refactored SectionsSidebar and PostSectionListItem components to support sortable context - Ensured sections are sorted by order when fetched from the API
…tarter into post-section-apis
- Introduced ControlledSelect component for layout options in the PostSectionEditor - Added layout choices: Full Width, Two Column, and Grid - Enhanced form functionality for better post section management
These changes provide a robust foundation for managing content within the Medusa framework, enabling users to create and manage posts effectively.
Summary by CodeRabbit