Bind empty strings to nil pointers #2778
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR addresses an issue where empty parameter values (/?v=) are not properly handled when binding to pointer struct fields. Currently, when an empty value is passed for a field that is a pointer (e.g., *time.Time), the binding mechanism attempts to parse it rather than setting it to nil.
The change ensures that empty parameter values are treated differently from invalid values when binding to pointer fields:
This behavior provides a cleaner way to handle optional fields in request parameters.
The motivation behind this change is handle empty optional params as mentioned above. This behaviour seems to be the default for a number of JS clients making requests to the echo handlers.