Skip to content

Add [email protected] to testgrid-alert-email for master-blocking and master-informing jobs #34548

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Vyom-Yadav
Copy link
Member

Adds [email protected] to all jobs which have testgrid-dashboards: .*sig-release-master-(informing|blocking).*

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. labels Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. label Mar 19, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows. labels Mar 19, 2025
@Vyom-Yadav
Copy link
Member Author

I'll update the generate conf for dra.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

looks good for sig node. Maybe sig testing representative can approve globally.

@SergeyKanzhelev SergeyKanzhelev moved this from Triage to Archive-it in SIG Node CI/Test Board Mar 19, 2025
@enj enj added this to SIG Auth Mar 20, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in SIG Auth Mar 20, 2025
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

looks good for sig node. Maybe sig testing representative can approve globally.

yeah
/assign

is there any context / discussion / sig release approval we can point to?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 20, 2025
@Vyom-Yadav Vyom-Yadav force-pushed the add-release-team-to-alert-emails branch from 682521d to 5cd3d50 Compare March 23, 2025 13:49
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 23, 2025
@Vyom-Yadav
Copy link
Member Author

is there any context / discussion / sig release approval we can point to?

Yeah, this has been a longstanding item. It has been mentioned in the previous retros:

CC'ing the current RT lead and Release Signal Lead

/cc @npolshakova @wendy-ha18

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 24, 2025
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ postsubmits:
cluster: k8s-infra-prow-build-trusted
annotations:
testgrid-dashboards: sig-release-releng-blocking, sig-release-master-informing, sig-release-image-pushes, sig-k8s-infra-gcb
Copy link
Member

@BenTheElder BenTheElder Mar 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should probably be a follow-up, but I'm not convinced this should be in release-master-informing? it's not testing kubernetes. (vs sig-release-releng-blocking, that makes sense)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(same for ~all of image-pushing/)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll open a thread in #sig-release

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@benjaminapetersen benjaminapetersen moved this from Needs Triage to !SIG Auth in SIG Auth Apr 28, 2025
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Apr 29, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 29, 2025
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

7 similar comments
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@wendy-ha18
Copy link
Member

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 30, 2025
@Vyom-Yadav Vyom-Yadav force-pushed the add-release-team-to-alert-emails branch from 5cd3d50 to ce3f0c6 Compare May 24, 2025 08:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 24, 2025
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented May 26, 2025

/approve
/lgtm

please remove /hold when appropriate

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, dims, Vyom-Yadav

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@Vyom-Yadav
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b863e28 into kubernetes:master May 26, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from !SIG Auth to Closed / Done in SIG Auth May 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Vyom-Yadav: Updated the job-config configmap in namespace default at cluster test-infra-trusted using the following files:

  • key k8s-staging-artifact-promoter.yaml using file config/jobs/image-pushing/releng/k8s-staging-artifact-promoter.yaml
  • key k8s-staging-build-image.yaml using file config/jobs/image-pushing/releng/k8s-staging-build-image.yaml
  • key k8s-staging-kubernetes.yaml using file config/jobs/image-pushing/releng/k8s-staging-kubernetes.yaml
  • key release-master-windows.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes-sigs/sig-windows/release-master-windows.yaml
  • key sig-auth-encryption-at-rest.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-auth/sig-auth-encryption-at-rest.yaml
  • key ec2-e2e.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-cloud-provider/aws/ec2-e2e.yaml
  • key gcp-gce.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-cloud-provider/gcp/gcp-gce.yaml
  • key gpu-gce.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-cloud-provider/gcp/gpu/gpu-gce.yaml
  • key sig-network-gce.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-network/sig-network-gce.yaml
  • key crio.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-node/crio.yaml
  • key dra-ci.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-node/dra-ci.yaml
  • key node-kubelet.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-node/node-kubelet.yaml
  • key sig-scalability-periodic-ec2.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-scalability/sig-scalability-periodic-ec2.yaml
  • key sig-scalability-release-blocking-jobs.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-scalability/sig-scalability-release-blocking-jobs.yaml
  • key kubernetes-kind.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-testing/kubernetes-kind.yaml
  • key make-test.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-testing/make-test.yaml
  • key verify.yaml using file config/jobs/kubernetes/sig-testing/verify.yaml

In response to this:

Adds [email protected] to all jobs which have testgrid-dashboards: .*sig-release-master-(informing|blocking).*

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/config Issues or PRs related to code in /config area/jobs area/provider/aws Issues or PRs related to aws provider area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider area/release-eng Issues or PRs related to the Release Engineering subproject cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/release Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Release. sig/scalability Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scalability. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. sig/windows Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Windows. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Closed / Done
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants