Skip to content

Conversation

@justinsb
Copy link
Member

@justinsb justinsb commented Oct 23, 2025

Builds on #17636

Adds:

  • capi: refactor bootstrap building to use shared ConfigBuilder

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from zetaab October 23, 2025 09:48
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/nodeup area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider labels Oct 23, 2025
@justinsb justinsb changed the title capi: refactor to use shared nodeup builder WIP: capi: refactor to use shared nodeup builder Oct 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Oct 24, 2025
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the clusterapi_controllers_refactor_nodeup branch from 3eb9c7f to f8f1ee8 Compare October 25, 2025 13:28
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 25, 2025
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-scenario-clusterapi-gcp

@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the clusterapi_controllers_refactor_nodeup branch 3 times, most recently from 65b8a82 to 8d7d943 Compare October 26, 2025 13:20
The intent is that the ConfigBuilder from bare-metal support is reusable.
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the clusterapi_controllers_refactor_nodeup branch from 8d7d943 to aa3e332 Compare October 26, 2025 14:56
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-scenario-clusterapi-gcp

@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-kops-scenario-clusterapi-gcp

Hit the problem with calico not coming up, we've seen that a few times but it seems unrelated

@justinsb justinsb changed the title WIP: capi: refactor to use shared nodeup builder capi: refactor to use shared nodeup builder Oct 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 26, 2025
@justinsb
Copy link
Member Author

Probably should have just done it this way in the first place, it's much less code!

/assign @hakman

@hakman
Copy link
Member

hakman commented Oct 26, 2025

Yup, totally agree.
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hakman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 26, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 941b7c0 into kubernetes:master Oct 26, 2025
28 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.35 milestone Oct 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kops-controller area/nodeup area/provider/gcp Issues or PRs related to gcp provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants