Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: generate kubeconfig on the fly #17155

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

justinsb
Copy link
Member

  • chore: refactor factory to accept a cluster
  • chore: generate kubeconfig on the fly

This should allow us to build our own rest config in future,
rather than relying on the kubeconfig being configured correctly.

To do this, we need to stop sharing the factory between the channels
and kops commands.
Some kOps actions require connecting to the cluster, but
we don't always have a kubeconfig available.

This commit adds a function to generate a client config on the fly
(including a certificate) when needed.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from justinsb. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/channels area/rolling-update cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants