Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propagate job labels and annotations #737

Merged

Conversation

imreddy13
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?
/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Addresses a regression introduced by #696 that drops pod labels and annotations.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #696

Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
No

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Dec 20, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Dec 20, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @imreddy13!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/jobset 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/jobset has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @imreddy13. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 20, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 20, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-jobset ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cb97e1b
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-sigs-jobset/deploys/677c78bdc0d8c80008304d82
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-737--kubernetes-sigs-jobset.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Dec 20, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 20, 2024
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

could you squash your commits once you are done with the feedback

@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Dec 20, 2024

/label tide/merge-method-squash

no need to squash explicitly

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Dec 20, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 21, 2024
@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Dec 21, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 21, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahg-g, imreddy13

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 21, 2024
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm cancel

@imreddy13 Please fix the verify step.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 23, 2024
replicatedJobName = "replicated-job"
jobName = "test-job"
ns = "default"
jobAnnotations = map[string]string{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reading #729, are we not expecting top level labels/annotations to propagate down into the Jobs/Pods?

We should maybe comment on that ticket that top-level labels/annotations won't be passed down but they should be set on the Job/Pod?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the current implementation, only certain top level labels/annotations are explicitly passed down - see https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/jobset/blob/main/pkg/controllers/jobset_controller.go#L767

So yes I think by design the user needs to set labels on the ReplicatedJob spec in order to be passed down to the Job/Pod. Is my understanding correct @ahg-g ?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct

@ahg-g
Copy link
Contributor

ahg-g commented Jan 7, 2025

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit cd00ccf into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 7, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants