Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhanced Linting #813

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

anshuman-agarwala
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind test
What this PR does / why we need it:
Added .golangci.yml to enhance linting
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #751

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@anshuman-agarwala: The label(s) kind/test cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind test
What this PR does / why we need it:
Added .golangci.yml to enhance linting
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #751

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

none

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from mkumatag January 6, 2025 10:36
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from yussufsh January 6, 2025 10:36
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @anshuman-agarwala!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/ibm-powervs-block-csi-driver 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/ibm-powervs-block-csi-driver has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jan 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @anshuman-agarwala. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 6, 2025
@yussufsh
Copy link
Contributor

yussufsh commented Jan 6, 2025

/kind test
/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yussufsh: The label(s) kind/test cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/kind test
/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 6, 2025
@yussufsh
Copy link
Contributor

yussufsh commented Jan 6, 2025

/kind test

@kishen-v
Copy link
Contributor

kishen-v commented Jan 7, 2025

/hold - WIP

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 7, 2025
@anshuman-agarwala
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@yussufsh yussufsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

.golangci.yml Outdated
Comment on lines 201 to 202
allow-parallel-runners: true
go: "1.22"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Let's add a new line at the end of the file.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

.golangci.yml Outdated
- tools
- e2e
allow-parallel-runners: true
go: "1.22"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this point to 1.23 as what is used in the project?
Maintaining go version strings at multiple places during upgrades is just a concern.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed the go version.

Copy link
Contributor

@yussufsh yussufsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anshuman-agarwala, yussufsh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a97a95f into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 13, 2025
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/test lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhance the code linting
4 participants