-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(Gateway API): improve annotations support #4870
Open
Dadeos-Menlo
wants to merge
4
commits into
kubernetes-sigs:master
Choose a base branch
from
Dadeos-Menlo:gateway_annotations
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+438
−243
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
aa138f2
Add validation of Endpoint.Labels to unit-test expectations.
Dadeos-Menlo 9586665
Refactor Gateway source processing.
Dadeos-Menlo cc10e6d
Honour annotations specified on Gateway resources.
Dadeos-Menlo 304439d
Update documentation.
Dadeos-Menlo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The help is valid.
This option has been introduced with PR #745.
As you can see, it's still checked:
https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/external-dns/blob/master/pkg/apis/externaldns/validation/validation.go#L84
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment was merely relocated from the pre-existing sources…
I suspect that the observation being made by its original author is that the referenced help states that:
and yet various implementations, including this one, do not check that the value of
FQDNTemplate
has been specified. However, they may not have appreciated the additional validation to which you refer that appears to preclude theIgnoreHostnameAnnotation
value beingtrue
whilst theFQDNTemplate
is empty.Would you like me to eliminate the "TODO: …" comment?