-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Add debug logging for the state of the priority queue #3075
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This debug logging prints the state of the workqueue in order to allow debugging it. It will continously check at runtime if debug logging is enabled and do nothing if not, making it very cheap if unused. Sample output piped through `jq` for readability: ``` { "level": "debug", "ts": "2025-01-19T12:00:43-05:00", "msg": "workqueue_state", "controller": "configmap", "items": [ { "key": { "Namespace": "kube-system", "Name": "kubeadm-config" }, "addedCounter": 1, "priority": -100 } ] } ```
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
addedCounter uint64 | ||
priority int | ||
readyAt *time.Time | ||
Key T `json:"key"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exporting these is required for the json marshalling, otherwise they get omitted
// Log level may change at runtime, so keep the | ||
// loop going even if a given level is currently | ||
// not enabled. | ||
if !w.log.V(1).Enabled() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know its a bit more common in the ecosystem to use V(4)
for debug
, but I think many of our users use zap
+ zapr
as the underlying implementation for the logr.Logger
, given that we include it and do that in our examples. The problem is that zap
has named log levels. These do end up mapping to a int8
but I personally only learned this recently and I've been using zap
for years. The named debug
level maps to -1
and zapr
then switches the sign, resulting in V(1)
in the logr.Logger
.
Unless we have a strong reason why we need something higher than V(1)
, i'd like to keep it this way so that this log shows up if someone uses a zap
logger on debug
level.
This debug logging prints the state of the workqueue in order to allow debugging it. It will continously check at runtime if debug logging is enabled and do nothing if not, making it very cheap if unused.
Sample output piped through
jq
for readability: