Remove resteasy-jackson-provider #2597
Open
+0
−5
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
1 similar comment
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
akumar074
requested changes
Jul 23, 2025
pom.xml
Outdated
| <version.org.jboss.arquillian.graphene>2.3.2</version.org.jboss.arquillian.graphene> | ||
| <version.com.google.guava.for-selenium>33.2.1-jre</version.com.google.guava.for-selenium> | ||
| <version.org.jboss.errai>4.17.0.Final</version.org.jboss.errai> | ||
| <version.org.jboss.errai>4.16.0.Final</version.org.jboss.errai> |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggested change
| <version.org.jboss.errai>4.16.0.Final</version.org.jboss.errai> | |
| <version.org.jboss.errai>4.17.0.Final</version.org.jboss.errai> |
This can be removed now.
pom.xml
Outdated
| <groupId>org.jboss.resteasy</groupId> | ||
| <artifactId>resteasy-jackson-provider</artifactId> | ||
| <version>${version.org.jboss.resteasy}</version> | ||
| <scope>test</scope> |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this change needed here? I think it's just for dependency management for bom, and scope can be defined in other poms.
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
1 similar comment
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
1 similar comment
Member
Author
|
jenkins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenklins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Member
Author
|
jenklins run cdb |
Member
Author
|
jenkins run fdb |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes CVE-2019-10172
Ensemble:
kiegroup/appformer#1453
kiegroup/kie-wb-common#3839
kiegroup/droolsjbpm-integration#3084
kiegroup/kie-wb-distributions#1249
kiegroup/jbpm-wb#1610
kiegroup/jbpm#2468
Thank you for submitting this pull request
JIRA: (please edit the JIRA link if it exists)
link
referenced Pull Requests: (please edit the URLs of referenced pullrequests if they exist)
You can check Kiegroup organization repositories CI status from Chain Status webpage
How to replicate CI configuration locally?
Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.
build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used locally on command line or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.
A general local execution could be the following one, where the tool clones all dependent projects starting from the
-spone and it locally applies the pull request (if it exists) in order to reproduce a complete build scenario for the provided Pull Request.How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
a pull request please add comment: Jenkins retest (using this e.g. Jenkins retest this optional but no longer required)
for a full downstream build
run_fdba compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb
a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb
an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream
for windows-specific os job add the label
windows_checkHow to backport a pull request to a different branch?
In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format
backport-<branch-name>, where<branch-name>is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g.,backport-7.67.xto backport the original PR to the7.67.xbranch).Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.
If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.