Skip to content

[Draft] Experimenting with Soft Errors #42

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jan 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

TotalTechGeek
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 18, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12849127585

Details

  • 112 of 129 (86.82%) changed or added relevant lines in 9 files are covered.
  • 6 unchanged lines in 3 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.2%) to 92.217%

Changes Missing Coverage Covered Lines Changed/Added Lines %
legacy.js 3 6 50.0%
defaultMethods.js 76 90 84.44%
Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
utilities/chainingSupported.js 1 75.0%
defaultMethods.js 2 90.08%
legacy.js 3 88.69%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12835218046: 0.2%
Covered Lines: 970
Relevant Lines: 1003

💛 - Coveralls

@TotalTechGeek TotalTechGeek changed the title Experimenting with Soft Errors [Draft] Experimenting with Soft Errors Jan 18, 2025
@TotalTechGeek
Copy link
Member Author

I'm pre-emptively merging, I can walk back some of the changes if we pivot to hard errors, as most of the scaffolding will be the same.

@TotalTechGeek TotalTechGeek merged commit eaffdec into master Jan 19, 2025
6 checks passed
@TotalTechGeek TotalTechGeek deleted the proposal/error branch January 20, 2025 22:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants