Session 6: Comprehensive Test Suite Analysis (Analysis Only - No Code Changes) #2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Comprehensive analysis of all test files to identify systemic issues vs edge cases before implementing Priority 5.
KEY FINDING: User-defined function return types ALREADY WORK. Priority 5 assumption was incorrect.
Analysis Results
Test Suite Statistics
Error Concentration
Error Categories
Type mismatch (150 errors, 44.2%)
unknowntype (137/150)Undefined variable (168 errors, 49.6%)
showindis,searchdiv,prd,longStopPrevCondition type (16 errors, 4.7%)
unknowntype propagationWhat Works ✅
What Doesn't Work ❌
Evidence
Test Case 1: User Functions Work
Result: 0 errors
Test Case 2: Small Files Work
Result: 0 errors (3 statements)
Test Case 3: Large Files Fail
Same pattern in tun-satiroglu.pine (95 statements):
Investigation Tools Created
comprehensive-test-analysis.js- Analyzes all .pine filesanalyze-type-mismatches.js- Deep dive into type errorsanalyze-undefined-vars.js- Verifies variables in sourceinvestigate-input-functions.js- Tests input declarationstest-*.js- Various isolated test casesRecommendations
DO NOT Implement Original Priority 5
User-defined function return types already work perfectly. No implementation needed.
INVESTIGATE Large File Variable Recognition (Critical Bug)
ADD Incremental Test Suite
Create tests for progressive complexity:
small-file-10-statements.pinemedium-file-50-statements.pinelarge-file-100-statements.pineFIX Scope Lookup or Two-Pass Collection
Debug
collectDeclarations()to understand why it works on small files but fails on large files.Detailed Documentation
See
COMPREHENSIVE-FINDINGS-SESSION-6.mdfor:Test Plan
No code changes in this PR - analysis only. Next steps: