Skip to content

Conversation

janfaracik
Copy link
Member

@janfaracik janfaracik commented Oct 15, 2025

image image

This PR adds an experimental dashboard UI, hidden behind a flag, in line with the new job and run pages.

What's new?

  • New design, consistent with jobs and builds
  • Trying to reduce Jelly duplication (E.g. folder plugin duplicates stuff from core, would be good not to)
  • App bar supports icons, so plugins don't need to implement that themselves
  • Support for icons/badges for tabs

There'll be more to come/more polish in future iterations.

Testing done

  • UI isn't ideal at the moment, but it is functional

Proposed changelog entries

  • Add experimental dashboard UI

Proposed changelog category

/label web-ui,rfe

Proposed upgrade guidelines

N/A

Submitter checklist

  • The Jira issue, if it exists, is well-described.
  • The changelog entries and upgrade guidelines are appropriate for the audience affected by the change (users or developers, depending on the change) and are in the imperative mood (see examples). Fill in the Proposed upgrade guidelines section only if there are breaking changes or changes that may require extra steps from users during upgrade.
  • There is automated testing or an explanation as to why this change has no tests.
  • New public classes, fields, and methods are annotated with @Restricted or have @since TODO Javadocs, as appropriate.
  • New deprecations are annotated with @Deprecated(since = "TODO") or @Deprecated(forRemoval = true, since = "TODO"), if applicable.
  • New or substantially changed JavaScript is not defined inline and does not call eval to ease future introduction of Content Security Policy (CSP) directives (see documentation).
  • For dependency updates, there are links to external changelogs and, if possible, full differentials.
  • For new APIs and extension points, there is a link to at least one consumer.

Desired reviewers

@jenkinsci/sig-ux

Before the changes are marked as ready-for-merge:

Maintainer checklist

  • There are at least two (2) approvals for the pull request and no outstanding requests for change.
  • Conversations in the pull request are over, or it is explicit that a reviewer is not blocking the change.
  • Changelog entries in the pull request title and/or Proposed changelog entries are accurate, human-readable, and in the imperative mood.
  • Proper changelog labels are set so that the changelog can be generated automatically.
  • If the change needs additional upgrade steps from users, the upgrade-guide-needed label is set and there is a Proposed upgrade guidelines section in the pull request title (see example).
  • If it would make sense to backport the change to LTS, a Jira issue must exist, be a Bug or Improvement, and be labeled as lts-candidate to be considered (see query).

@comment-ops-bot comment-ops-bot bot added web-ui The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted labels Oct 15, 2025
@janfaracik janfaracik requested a review from a team October 16, 2025 14:28
@janfaracik janfaracik marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2025 14:28
@janfaracik janfaracik added the squash-merge-me Unclean or useless commit history, should be merged only with squash-merge label Oct 16, 2025
@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Oct 16, 2025

Tab bar needs to handle better many views:

image

I've seen many examples of places with 3-4 rows of views normally dashboards for teams.

@timja
Copy link
Member

timja commented Oct 16, 2025

Branches is touching the table now when it wasn't before:

image

(guessing that branches will go away though?)

@janfaracik
Copy link
Member Author

Tab bar needs to handle better many views:

image

I've seen many examples of places with 3-4 rows of views normally dashboards for teams.

Yup, I want to add an overflow in a similar way to the breadcrumbs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rfe For changelog: Minor enhancement. use `major-rfe` for changes to be highlighted squash-merge-me Unclean or useless commit history, should be merged only with squash-merge web-ui The PR includes WebUI changes which may need special expertise

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants