Bump 'prost' version to 0.11

[fabricedesre]

This helps downstream crates to not have duplicate version of 'hashbrown'

[fabricedesre]

Ping @vmx :)

[vmx]

I usually do version bumps during the release, so reverting that commit would be nice.

We didn't upgrade to prost 0.11 as it doesn't bundle protoc anymore. I think there's some alternative that does that. So either leave it at 0.10, or dig into the alternative :)

[fabricedesre]

We didn't upgrade to prost 0.11 as it doesn't bundle protoc anymore. I think there's some alternative that does that. So either leave it at 0.10, or dig into the alternative :)

I used the recommended protobuf-src crate to vendor protoc. If that's fine, can you publish a new version?

[vmx]

As you mention downstream crates. Please be aware that this implementation of DAG-PB is currently not spec compliant. The tracking issue is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792370. #139.

[fabricedesre]

As you mention downstream crates. Please be aware that this implementation of DAG-PB is currently not spec compliant. The tracking issue is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792370.

sorry, how is that bug relevant here?

[vmx]

As you mention downstream crates. Please be aware that this implementation of DAG-PB is currently not spec compliant. The tracking issue is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1792370.

sorry, how is that bug relevant here?

Sorry, copy and paste failure, I've meant #139.

[fabricedesre]

I still don't understand - this PR is not changing any behavior, just trying to reduce dependencies duplicates.

[vmx]

I still don't understand - this PR is not changing any behavior, just trying to reduce dependencies duplicates.

My comment was related directly to this PR. It was just a note, that users that use DAG-PB should be aware that the current implementation isn't spec compliant. As you are interested in reducing duplicated dependencies, I thought it would be appropriate to mention that.

[vmx]

Does anyone know how to fix the Windows CI, so that it can compile protoc?

[fabricedesre]

Does anyone know how to fix the Windows CI, so that it can compile protoc?

Looks like it's blocked on protobuf-src itself: MaterializeInc/rust-protobuf-native#4 😢

[vmx]

As protobuf-src is using autocxx, https://github.com/google/autocxx/blob/b245636274be4206be5849cf3355b315a609969c/.github/workflows/ci.yml might give some ideas on how to get it compiled on Windows.

[fabricedesre]

Closing in favor of #161