OKRs - 2019 Q4 - Bifrost #1037
OKRs - 2019 Q4 - Bifrost #1037
Conversation
|
Ok so, I've added a draft of the Bifrost team Q4 objectives and key results. All feedback welcome! I'm particularly interested in how we can carefully use the gateways to get feedback on changes in go-ipfs as a stop-gap while the testbed work is in progress... that and making sure all the critical pieces of the ipfs public infrastrucure are cleaned up and consolidated. Again, feedback is encouraged! |
|
|
||
| ### IPFS infrastructure informs and improves core ipfs development | ||
|
|
||
| - **P0** - Traffic is mirrored to staging gateway running latest go-ipfs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
go-ipfs needs an automatically nightly-deployed gateway too
| - **P1** - Ansible tower manages our deployments | ||
| - Running ansible from CI gets us so far, but will cause friction as preload/bootstrappers are brought into the bifrost-infra | ||
| - **P1** - 4 new DNS Bootstrap nodes are provisioned, monitored, and documented. | ||
| - **P2** - 8 Solarnet Bootstrap nodes are rebuilt and monitored or decommissioned. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would decommission from DO directly and deploy on Packer. Must salvage at least some peer IDs.
|
@hsanjuan already got you covered on the "pretty error pages"... https://github.com/ipfs/team-mgmt/pull/1037/files#diff-d954df61065b5dfa07f5e49151ffef14R52 |
|
👍 |
|
|
||
| ### IPFS infrastructure informs and improves core ipfs development | ||
|
|
||
| - **P0** - Traffic is mirrored to staging gateway running latest go-ipfs. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any chance we could get a nightly bootstrapper too? 😍.
| - companion is in brave now, so we need to ready for increased usage from js-ipfs | ||
| - **P1** - Ansible tower manages our deployments | ||
| - Running ansible from CI gets us so far, but will cause friction as preload/bootstrappers are brought into the bifrost-infra | ||
| - **P1** - 4 new DNS Bootstrap nodes are provisioned, monitored, and documented. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would this be a good opportunity to dogfood /dns multiaddrs (supporting both ip4 and ip6)?
Ref. multiformats/go-multiaddr-dns#17
refs #1033