Add GFED4 BB4CMIP download and basic handling #13
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unfortunately the esgpull did not run successfully for me.
(esgf) C:\Users\kikstra\Documents\GitHub\emissions_harmonization_historical>esgpull download
<8b2ffd>
└── tags: bb4cmip
distrib: False
latest: True
replica: None
retracted: False
grid_label: gn
mip_era: CMIP6Plus
project: input4MIPs
source_id: DRES-CMIP-BB4CMIP7-1-0
variable_id: BC, CH4, CO, CO2, N2O, NH3, NOx, OC, SO2, gridcellarea
files: 0 bytes / 11.1 GiB [0/19]
<2c3e51> · 537.3 MiB · 942.3 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<30fd96> · 537.7 MiB · 762.5 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<50cca8> · 719.8 MiB · 849.6 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<013eba> · 719.8 MiB · 802.3 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<51af2e> · 719.7 MiB · 772.9 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<61c679> · 538.2 MiB · 1,021.2 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<cfa534> · 41.2 kiB · 203.1 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<62f9ea> · 537.5 MiB · 875.2 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<75178b> · 537.8 MiB · 877.4 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<86e383> · 538.5 MiB · 920.0 kiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<dc1fbb> · 537.7 MiB · 1.1 MiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<cd953c> · 719.4 MiB · 1.0 MiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
<f3d829> · 719.9 MiB · 1.7 MiB/s · esgf-data2.llnl.gov
13/13 29:46
Downloaded 13 new files for a total size of 7.2 GiB
ExceptionGroup: Download (6 sub-exceptions)
See C:\Users\kikstra\Documents\GitHub\emissions_harmonization_historical\data\national\gfed-bb4cmip\data_raw\log\esgpull-download-2024-10-22_11-32-36.log for error log.
Aborted!
Any tips/instructions on how to still complete the download? Or how to restart?
| # unit_label = "Mt CH4 / yr" | ||
| # rcmip_gas = "CH4" | ||
|
|
||
| # # TODO: check. I don't think we used this last time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably because it was only done on as a global total last time? Now we would like to do regional.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Additional related info from Van Marle et al. 2017:
"Climate models should not use the CO2 emissions (or
nitrogen emissions if the nitrogen cycle is included in
the model), as forcing because in general these emis-
sions are not net emissions to the atmosphere, but a
return pathway of previously sequestered carbon just as
respiration is. The exceptions are CO2 emissions from
deforestation and peat fires. However, the models that do
not simulate land use change are recommended to use
land use change emissions prepared for AR6 (http://www.
mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/the-land-in-the-earth-system/
working-groups/climate-biogeosphere-interaction/
landuse-change-emission-data/)."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably because it was only done on as a global total last time?
I think that's part of it. I also don't think CEDS did N2O last time, which is why we used PRIMAP. So yes, probably one to rethink.
Additional related info from Van Marle et al. 2017
Good find. We're going to have to ask Margreet or someone what this actually means, because it's not fully clear to me what this means for MAGICC (I think the answer is, don't include these for MAGICC either, but we should check).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okay, turned into issue #16
| # unit_label = "Mt CO / yr" | ||
| # rcmip_gas = "CO" | ||
|
|
||
| # # TODO: check. I don't think we used this last time so we may want to ignore this again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that's right, but not yet sure I fully understand the reason.
Is it because it is assumed to be part of the global GCB value that we'll harmonize to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it because it is assumed to be part of the global GCB value that we'll harmonize to?
I believe so (we should ask Thomas whether he thinks it's already part of the GCB value or not).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
OK, turned into issue #17
Ah yes, would be a good one to add to the README. I think you basically just run |
Will add it to a README update PR later.
|
No description provided.