Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests to increase spec coverage #147

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

fb55
Copy link
Contributor

@fb55 fb55 commented May 20, 2022

parse5 is now tracking the test coverage of its codebase. The tests here all cover areas that previously didn't have tests.

parse5 is now tracking the test coverage of its codebase. The tests here all cover areas that previously didn't have tests.
tree-construction/doctype01.dat Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tree-construction/doctype01.dat Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@gsnedders gsnedders left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry for not seeing this before (yikes)!

mostly, I think we should just move the quirks-mode tests into a new file, rather than scattering them around

tree-construction/doctype01.dat Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tree-construction/doctype01.dat Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fb55
Copy link
Contributor Author

fb55 commented Mar 25, 2023

Thanks for the review @gsnedders, made the requested changes. I would like to wait for the open PRs for #141 to be landed before this one, to make sure I didn't mess up subtleties around errors.

@gsnedders
Copy link
Member

(Let me know if you do indeed think this is ready to land.)

Co-authored-by: Mike Dalessio <[email protected]>
@fb55
Copy link
Contributor Author

fb55 commented Aug 17, 2023

This should now be ready to land.

@gsnedders gsnedders merged commit a9f4496 into html5lib:master Aug 17, 2023
@fb55 fb55 deleted the increase-coverage branch August 17, 2023 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants