Skip to content

Conversation

@hebertialmeida
Copy link
Owner

I decided to migrate to https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-cmark which is a well maintained fork of cmark-gfm + cmark + has the SPM support.

Maintaining my own fork of cmark + gfm is a lot of work, because the two repos have diverted and merging things are a pain...

<SkippedTests>
<Test
Identifier = "ContentBlockPositionTests/testHTMLCommentPosition()">
Identifier = "ParserInlineTests/testInvalidLink()">
Copy link
Owner Author

@hebertialmeida hebertialmeida Oct 30, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If swiftlang/swift-cmark#84 gets merged, add this test back into the suite.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (daf7003) to head (8cb12b3).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master        #8      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   92.85%   100.00%   +7.14%     
===========================================
  Files           1         1              
  Lines         182       137      -45     
===========================================
- Hits          169       137      -32     
+ Misses         13         0      -13     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hebertialmeida hebertialmeida merged commit 9a185c1 into master Oct 30, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants