Skip to content

Conversation

@kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@melix
Copy link
Member

melix commented Feb 9, 2015

Thanks for the contribution. This should be reviewed carefully, because even if some static classes can be replaced with static inner ones, in case of non private ones at least it is a binary breaking change.

@kamilszymanski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Though minor changes to protected and package private classes (none to public) were introduced behavioral compatibility was preserved.

melix pushed a commit to melix/groovy-core that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants