Remove contradictory heading guidance for card titles #3610
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… as source of truth
taysea
commented
Dec 7, 2023
halocline
reviewed
Dec 7, 2023
taysea
commented
Dec 7, 2023
halocline
approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Deploy Preview
What does this PR do?
Removes contradictory/outdated guidance from heading page re: card titles. Removing this bullet to allow Card page to serve as source of truth for card guidance.
Where should the reviewer start?
What testing has been done on this PR?
In addition to the feature you are implementing, have you checked the following:
General UX Checks
Accessibility Checks
Code Quality Checks
How should this be manually tested?
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant issues?
Screenshots (if appropriate)
Should this PR be mentioned in Design System updates?
Is this change backwards compatible or is it a breaking change?