Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add MODIFICATION type #72

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024
Merged

add MODIFICATION type #72

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 13, 2024

Conversation

dbraquart
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dbraquart dbraquart force-pushed the create-new-modification-element branch from c85552b to 438cda8 Compare February 6, 2024 16:17
@dbraquart dbraquart force-pushed the create-new-modification-element branch 2 times, most recently from fffd1eb to fa28bf4 Compare February 8, 2024 18:43
@dbraquart dbraquart force-pushed the create-new-modification-element branch from fa28bf4 to db792a7 Compare February 8, 2024 19:10
@@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ public class ExploreTest {
private Map<String, Object> specificMetadata = new HashMap<>();
private Map<String, Object> specificMetadata2 = new HashMap<>();
private Map<String, Object> caseSpecificMetadata = new HashMap<>();
private Map<String, Object> modificationSpecificMetadata = new HashMap<>();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need anymore to allocate those 4 maps at declaration point ...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

…on-element

# Conflicts:
#	src/main/resources/application-local.yml
Copy link

@dbraquart dbraquart merged commit 2052301 into main Feb 13, 2024
3 checks passed
@dbraquart dbraquart deleted the create-new-modification-element branch February 13, 2024 12:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants