Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix maxVertexBuffers test #3360

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

greggman
Copy link
Contributor

@greggman greggman commented Feb 2, 2024

The first test was completely invalid 😱. Now it should be correct.

Issue: #3346


Requirements for PR author:

  • All missing test coverage is tracked with "TODO" or .unimplemented().
  • New helpers are /** documented */ and new helper files are found in helper_index.txt.
  • Test behaves as expected in a WebGPU implementation. (If not passing, explain above.)

Requirements for reviewer sign-off:

  • Tests are properly located in the test tree.
  • Test descriptions allow a reader to "read only the test plans and evaluate coverage completeness", and accurately reflect the test code.
  • Tests provide complete coverage (including validation control cases). Missing coverage MUST be covered by TODOs.
  • Helpers and types promote readability and maintainability.

When landing this PR, be sure to make any necessary issue status updates.

@greggman greggman requested a review from kainino0x February 2, 2024 19:02
The first test was completely invalid 😱. Now it should be correct.
@greggman greggman force-pushed the fix-maxVertexBuffers-test branch from 4ca1065 to 73ba81b Compare February 3, 2024 10:17
@greggman greggman enabled auto-merge (rebase) February 3, 2024 10:17
@greggman greggman removed the request for review from kainino0x February 3, 2024 10:17
@greggman greggman merged commit 90b2eb7 into gpuweb:main Feb 3, 2024
1 check passed
@greggman greggman deleted the fix-maxVertexBuffers-test branch February 3, 2024 10:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants