Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates padding for ResponsiveTimeText #2317

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Updates padding for ResponsiveTimeText #2317

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

garanj
Copy link
Collaborator

@garanj garanj commented Jul 26, 2024

WHAT

Updates padding for ResponsiveTimeText based on updated guidance.

WHY

Guidance has been updated

HOW

Checklist 📋

  • Add explicit visibility modifier and explicit return types for public declarations
  • Run spotless check
  • Run tests
  • Update metalava's signature text files

@garanj garanj requested review from yschimke and removed request for yschimke July 26, 2024 21:59
@yschimke
Copy link
Collaborator

Did we confirm the 4 dp? I had some vague notion 2dp was suggested.

@garanj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

garanj commented Jul 26, 2024

Did we confirm the 4 dp? I had some vague notion 2dp was suggested.

Will wait for that confirmation before regenerating the screenshots?

Copy link
Collaborator

@BowerSteve BowerSteve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be 2dp

@yschimke
Copy link
Collaborator

@garanj updated and am running updates here https://github.com/google/horologist/actions/runs/10147468121

@yschimke
Copy link
Collaborator

We should change this PR, or recreate off this branch https://github.com/garanj/horologist/commits/time-text-padding/

@yschimke yschimke closed this Jul 30, 2024
@yschimke yschimke deleted the time-text branch August 28, 2024 12:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants