Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat(linters): add stringscountcontains linter #44820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
feat(linters): add stringscountcontains linter #44820
Changes from 3 commits
f38a7781fb9406fafc6577d26349File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[/tdd] The
//nolint:stringscountcontainsdirective is documented as supported but there is no testdata case exercising it — a future refactor could silently break nolint suppression.💡 Suggested testdata addition
Add a case in
testdata/src/stringscountcontains/stringscountcontains.go:This function should produce no diagnostic, confirming the nolint path is exercised.
@copilot please address this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[/tdd] The yoda-LEQ case (
0 >= strings.Count(s, sub)) is missing from testdata — 5 of the 6 yoda variants are covered but this one is absent.💡 Suggested addition
After line 45 (
badYodaLSS), add:And its golden counterpart:
The peer linter
stringsindexcontainshas a gap of its own (4 yoda cases vs 6), so it is fine to note this is already a step up — but since all 6 operators are documented in the PR description, full testdata coverage would prevent a silent regression if theLEQcase were ever broken.@copilot please address this.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.