fix(session-replay): Include layer background color when checking if a view is opaque #6629
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added expectations to verify the animation state during redaction, ensuring the position of the masked region is within the expected range during animation. This improves the robustness of the edge case tests for UI redaction.
…se tests Updated the animation duration and expectations in the edge case tests for UI redaction. The assertions now verify that the position of the masked region is approximately at the midpoint of the animation, enhancing the accuracy of the tests.
❌ 1 Tests Failed:
View the top 1 failed test(s) by shortest run time
To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard |
Performance metrics 🚀
|
| Revision | Plain | With Sentry | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7f4bf81 | 1241.73 ms | 1270.66 ms | 28.93 ms |
| afaa522 | 1234.71 ms | 1256.19 ms | 21.48 ms |
| 0b6776b | 1230.18 ms | 1262.06 ms | 31.88 ms |
| c6c1cb7 | 1235.71 ms | 1263.80 ms | 28.08 ms |
| 4e3915a | 1230.02 ms | 1258.90 ms | 28.88 ms |
| d72784d | 1214.31 ms | 1241.35 ms | 27.04 ms |
| 37238de | 1236.00 ms | 1267.80 ms | 31.80 ms |
| dad68ad | 1229.15 ms | 1261.98 ms | 32.83 ms |
| 5ae9ff1 | 1222.31 ms | 1250.96 ms | 28.65 ms |
| b115f82 | 1212.96 ms | 1251.92 ms | 38.96 ms |
App size
| Revision | Plain | With Sentry | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7f4bf81 | 23.75 KiB | 919.70 KiB | 895.95 KiB |
| afaa522 | 23.74 KiB | 996.91 KiB | 973.17 KiB |
| 0b6776b | 23.75 KiB | 968.23 KiB | 944.49 KiB |
| c6c1cb7 | 23.75 KiB | 928.15 KiB | 904.40 KiB |
| 4e3915a | 23.75 KiB | 858.69 KiB | 834.94 KiB |
| d72784d | 23.75 KiB | 988.01 KiB | 964.27 KiB |
| 37238de | 23.75 KiB | 963.18 KiB | 939.43 KiB |
| dad68ad | 23.75 KiB | 912.37 KiB | 888.63 KiB |
| 5ae9ff1 | 23.74 KiB | 971.82 KiB | 948.08 KiB |
| b115f82 | 23.75 KiB | 989.04 KiB | 965.30 KiB |
Previous results on branch: itay/improve_opaque_logic
Startup times
| Revision | Plain | With Sentry | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8858a16 | 1225.98 ms | 1255.96 ms | 29.98 ms |
| 27fdaa1 | 1232.08 ms | 1265.20 ms | 33.11 ms |
| 65af6ea | 1219.83 ms | 1250.20 ms | 30.37 ms |
App size
| Revision | Plain | With Sentry | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8858a16 | 23.75 KiB | 1.01 MiB | 1016.01 KiB |
| 27fdaa1 | 23.75 KiB | 1.02 MiB | 1019.46 KiB |
| 65af6ea | 23.75 KiB | 1.02 MiB | 1016.57 KiB |
philprime
changed the title
|
I followed up the investigation and confirm the issue and the fix:
let popup = PopupDialog(
title: "THIS IS THE DIALOG TITLE",
message: "This is the message section of the popup dialog default view",
)
let overlayAppearance = PopupDialogOverlayView.appearance()
overlayAppearance.color = .red
overlayAppearance.blurEnabled = false
overlayAppearance.liveBlurEnabled = false
overlayAppearance.opacity = 0.2
self.present(popup, animated: true) {
print(self.view.window!.value(forKey: "recursiveDescription")!)
}
|
philprime
changed the title
philprime
requested review from
noahsmartin,
philipphofmann and
philprime
as code owners
7 tasks
|
The changes of this PR will also need to be released as a hotfix in v8 |
|
Converting back to draft because the sample did not properly mask. |
|
I made masking stricter to stop semi‑transparent overlays from unmasking things underneath. Some overlays (like PopupDialog) add a see‑through tint as a child view on top of a clear container. Our old check could think the container was “opaque” and clear redactions behind it. Now, a view only clears what’s behind it if it’s truly opaque:
This protects privacy and worst case we do a bit less “clip‑out” optimization, leaving more masking in than necessary. I also updated tests to explicitly set opaque props when they expect clip‑out. Next Step:
|
noahsmartin
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this is an improvement, but I can still think of edge cases. For example what if you use UIColor(patternImage: ) I don't know what the opacity of this will be, but you could use an image that has some transparent regions. I wonder why we even need this, what if we just went ahead and masked on top of things even if they were covered by another view. I don't think that would hurt performance or anything a noticeable amount. IMO our long term strategy should be to do some simplifying things like that, rather than adding more edge cases
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📜 Description
Improve check for view opaqueness
💡 Motivation and Context
User's (or libraries) can override UIView's
backgroundColorand report a report different value (example).Since UIView are wrappers around
CALayer. we should consider using the actual layers properties too.This is draft because I have to verify this actually works
💚 How did you test it?
Run the app with Session Replay enabled and view the output.
Still needs more tests with popups and custom views
📝 Checklist
You have to check all boxes before merging:
sendDefaultPIIis enabled.Closes #6634