-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update libsqlite3-sys to allow 0.31 as well #218
Conversation
Seems like CI fails due to the new libsqlite3 version requiring a newer rust version. What would need to be done to bump that version? |
We've just bumped the MSRV, I'm all for doing it again. |
What would our new MSRV need to be? |
EDIT: might actually be 1.82 for |
Technically this wouldn't need a msrv change, as proj still would support the older |
It seems like it's currently impossible for me to work on the CI as it's not possible to run jobs here without approval and I also cannot run jobs on a fork as its impossible to pull images there |
Your PR runs here should no longer require approval. We're aware of the image-pull annoyance, I just haven't had time to figure out how to make the images public so they work in forks. |
@weiznich your fork should now be able to run its Actions. lmk if it can't. |
cbb5566
to
205e3ce
Compare
* Use `cargo minimal-version` for checking the MSRV builds * Fix some crate dependency minimal versions
205e3ce
to
12bbc14
Compare
It should be ready to review now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH I would have gone for a MSRV bump instead of the extra complexity, but I guess it looks fine otherwise
Given that the 2024 edition will make |
FYI (reviewers, future selves etc) this is the crate being used in the new action in the PR: https://github.com/taiki-e/cargo-hack |
@lnicola wdyt? I'm inclined to merge this. |
Yeah, should be good. |
CHANGES.md
orCHANGELOG.md