-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#155 | The infrastructure for Pagination, Order, and Filter has been created. #158
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduced a new pagination and sorting framework in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant AdminController
participant PostService
participant PostRepository
participant BasePage
AdminController->>PostService: getPostList(request)
PostService->>PostRepository: findPosts(pageable)
PostRepository-->>PostService: List<Post>
PostService-->>AdminController: BasePage<Post>
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
The necessary places have been corrected. The necessary places have been fixed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1)
7-8
: Consider adding documentation and reviewing the use of @SuppressWarnings.While the code is functionally correct, there are a couple of points to consider:
The use of
@SuppressWarnings
suggests there might be underlying issues that could be addressed more directly. Consider if it's possible to use generics or other techniques to avoid the need for suppressing these warnings.Adding Javadoc comments to explain the purpose of the
toSpecification()
method and the expected behavior of implementing classes would improve the code's maintainability and usability.Here's a suggested improvement:
public interface BaseFilter { - @SuppressWarnings({"java:S3740", "rawtypes"}) - Specification toSpecification(); + /** + * Converts the filter criteria to a JPA Specification. + * + * @return a Specification object representing the filter criteria + */ + <T> Specification<T> toSpecification(); }This change adds documentation and uses a generic type parameter to avoid the need for
@SuppressWarnings
.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (1)
Line range hint
1-14
: Summary: PostService interface updated to use new pagination model.The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to introduce a new pagination and sorting framework, as mentioned in the PR objectives. The shift from
Paging<Post>
toBasePage<Post>
in thegetPostListAdmin
method signature reflects this change.Key points:
- The import statements have been updated correctly.
- The method signature change is consistent with the new pagination model.
These changes seem appropriate and align well with the PR objectives. However, to ensure a smooth transition, it's crucial to verify that all implementations and usages of this interface across the codebase have been updated consistently.
As this change is part of a significant architectural shift in how pagination is handled, consider the following:
- Ensure comprehensive documentation of the new
BasePage
and related classes to facilitate easier adoption across the team.- Update any relevant API documentation to reflect the changes in return types.
- Consider creating or updating integration tests that specifically verify the new pagination behavior.
- If not already planned, consider a gradual rollout strategy to minimize potential disruptions, especially if this API is used by external clients.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (3)
30-45
: LGTM: Well-implemented factory method with a minor suggestionThe
of(Page<E> pageableEntities, List<C> content)
method effectively converts a Spring DataPage
to aBasePage
. The adjustment of the page number to be 1-based is a good practice. Including sorting information conditionally is appropriate.Minor suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the page number adjustment for future maintainers.
public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) { final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder() .content(content) + // Adjust to 1-based page number for consistency with user expectations .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1) .pageSize(content.size()) .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages()) .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements()); if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) { responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders()); } return responseBuilder.build(); }
47-64
: LGTM: Well-implemented factory method with refactoring suggestionThe
of(BaseFilter filter, Page<E> pageableEntities, List<C> content)
method effectively extends the functionality of the first method to include filtering. The implementation is consistent with the first method, which is good for maintainability.Suggestion: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication between the two methods. You could create a private helper method to handle the common logic.
Here's a potential refactoring:
+ private static <E, C> BasePage.BasePageBuilder<C> getBasePageBuilder( + final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) { + final var builder = BasePage.<C>builder() + .content(content) + .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1) + .pageSize(content.size()) + .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages()) + .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements()); + + if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) { + builder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders()); + } + + return builder; + } + public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) { - final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder() - .content(content) - .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1) - .pageSize(content.size()) - .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages()) - .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements()); - - if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) { - responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders()); - } - - return responseBuilder.build(); + return getBasePageBuilder(pageableEntities, content).build(); } public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final BaseFilter filter, final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) { - final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder() - .content(content) - .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1) - .pageSize(content.size()) - .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages()) - .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements()) + return getBasePageBuilder(pageableEntities, content) - .filteredBy(filter); - - if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) { - responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders()); - } - - return responseBuilder.build(); + .filteredBy(filter) + .build(); }This refactoring reduces code duplication and improves maintainability.
1-65
: LGTM: Well-designed pagination model with future enhancement suggestionsThe
BasePage<R>
class provides a comprehensive and flexible model for pagination, sorting, and filtering. It effectively leverages Spring Data'sPage
interface for compatibility with existing systems. The use of generics enhances type safety and reusability.Suggestions for future enhancements:
- Consider adding validation for input parameters in the factory methods.
- You might want to add methods for checking if there are next/previous pages available.
- Consider implementing
Serializable
if this class needs to be serialized (e.g., for caching or network transfer).Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:
import java.io.Serializable; public class BasePage<R> implements Serializable { // ... existing fields and methods ... public boolean hasNextPage() { return pageNumber < totalPageCount; } public boolean hasPreviousPage() { return pageNumber > 1; } public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) { Objects.requireNonNull(pageableEntities, "pageableEntities must not be null"); Objects.requireNonNull(content, "content must not be null"); // ... existing implementation ... } // ... similar null checks for the other factory method ... }src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (1)
Line range hint
1-62
: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications in this file successfully implement the transition from
Paging
toBasePage
for theAdminController
. The changes are minimal and focused, maintaining the existing functionality while updating the pagination model.To ensure a smooth transition:
- Verify that all necessary changes have been made in related files, especially in
PostService
.- Update any documentation or comments that might reference the old
Paging
class.- Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the new
BasePage
functionality in this context.As you continue to implement this new pagination framework:
- Ensure consistent usage of
BasePage
across all controllers and services.- Consider creating a migration guide for other developers working on the project.
- If not already done, update any API documentation to reflect the changes in the pagination model.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (2)
34-37
: LGTM: Pagination handling updated correctly.The changes in the
ticketMessageRead
method are consistent with the new pagination model. ThePaging
class has been correctly replaced withBasePage
, and the method for obtaining thePageable
object has been updated.However, there's a minor optimization opportunity:
Consider extracting
ticketResponses
to a local variable to avoid callingticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map()
twice:Pageable pageable = request.getPageable().toPageable(); Page<TicketMessageEntity> messagePage = ticketMessageRepository.findAll(pageable); -List<TicketMessageResponse> ticketResponses = ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent()); +List<TicketMessageResponse> ticketResponses = ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent()); final BasePage<TicketMessageResponse> posts = BasePage.of(messagePage, ticketResponses); return PagingResponse.<TicketMessageResponse>builder() .of(posts) - .content(ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent())) + .content(ticketResponses) .build();This change would improve performance by avoiding redundant mapping operations.
Line range hint
1-64
: LGTM: Consistent implementation of the new pagination model.The changes in this class align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The new pagination model has been correctly and consistently implemented across the relevant methods.
As a minor suggestion for improved code organization:
Consider extracting the common logic for creating the
PagingResponse
into a private helper method. This would reduce code duplication and make future changes easier. For example:private <T> PagingResponse<T> createPagingResponse(Page<?> page, List<T> content) { final BasePage<T> basePage = BasePage.of(page, content); return PagingResponse.<T>builder() .of(basePage) .content(content) .build(); }Then, you can use this method in both
ticketMessageRead
andticketMessageReadSelf
:return createPagingResponse(messagePage, ticketResponses);This change would make the code more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and easier to maintain.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (3)
37-41
: LGTM with a minor suggestion for optimization.The changes correctly implement the new pagination framework. However, there's a potential redundancy in setting the content of the PagingResponse.
Consider removing the redundant content setting in the PagingResponse builder:
final BasePage<TicketResponse> posts = BasePage.of(ticketPage, ticketResponses); -return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).content(ticketEntityToResponseMapper.map(ticketPage.getContent())).build(); +return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).build();The content is already set in the BasePage object, so there's no need to set it again in the builder.
62-65
: LGTM with the same suggestion for optimization as in ticketRead.The changes correctly implement the new pagination framework for the ticketReadSelf method. However, the same potential redundancy in setting the content of the PagingResponse exists here.
Consider removing the redundant content setting in the PagingResponse builder, similar to the suggestion for ticketRead:
final BasePage<TicketResponse> posts = BasePage.of(ticketPage, ticketResponses); -return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).content(ticketEntityToResponseMapper.map(ticketPage.getContent())).build(); +return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).build();This change will make the code more consistent and remove unnecessary duplication.
Multiple usages of old Paging classes found.
The investigation revealed that
PagingRequest
andPagingResponse
are still used across several files, indicating that the migration to the new pagination framework is incomplete. These usages include:
TicketServiceImpl.java
TicketController.java
AdminController.java
TicketMessageServiceImpl.java
TicketUserController.java
- ...and others.
Please update these instances to align with the new pagination framework to ensure consistency and maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-67
: Overall implementation looks good. Verify wider impact.The changes consistently implement the new pagination framework across the TicketServiceImpl class. The use of BasePage and the updated method for obtaining Pageable objects are applied correctly.
To ensure consistency across the codebase:
- Verify that all other service implementations have been updated similarly.
- Check if there are any remaining usages of the old Paging class that need to be replaced.
Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the old Paging class:
This will help identify any areas that might need further updates to align with the new pagination framework.
To ensure that all usages of the old
Paging
classes have been addressed, please run the following scripts:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining usages of the old Paging class echo "Searching for remaining usages of the old Paging class:" rg --type java "import.*Paging" src echo "Searching for usages of Paging in Java files:" rg --type java "\bPaging\b" srcLength of output: 2856
Script:
# Search for method parameters or return types using PagingRequest or PagingResponse echo "Searching for method signatures with PagingRequest or PagingResponse:" rg --type java '\bPagingRequest\b|\bPagingResponse\b' src # Search for variable declarations using PagingRequest or PagingResponse echo "Searching for variable declarations with PagingRequest or PagingResponse:" rg --type java '\bPagingRequest\b|\bPagingResponse\b' srcLength of output: 15507
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (1)
Line range hint
1-97
: Overall changes look good, but consider adding tests.The transition from
Paging
toBasePage
has been implemented consistently throughout the class. The changes align with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The overall structure and logic of the class remain intact, which is positive.However, given the significance of these changes to the pagination framework, it would be beneficial to ensure that appropriate unit tests are in place or updated to reflect these changes.
Would you like assistance in generating or updating unit tests for this class to cover the new
BasePage
implementation?src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java (1)
33-40
: Set thecontent
field in the builderIn the
of
method, thecontent
field is not being set. To ensure thatPagingResponse
includes the content fromBasePage
, consider adding.content(page.getContent())
to the builder chain.Apply this diff to include the
content
:public <M> PagingResponse.PagingResponseBuilder<R> of(final BasePage<M> page) { return PagingResponse.<R>builder() .pageNumber(page.getPageNumber()) .pageSize(page.getPageSize()) .totalPageCount(page.getTotalPageCount()) .totalElementCount(page.getTotalElementCount()) + .content(page.getContent()) .orderedBy(page.getOrderedBy()) .filteredBy(page.getFilteredBy()); }
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java (1)
18-68
: Enhance code documentation with Javadoc commentsAdding Javadoc comments to the
BaseSort
class, the innerBaseOrder
class, theDirection
enum, and methods liketoSort()
andof()
will improve code readability and maintainability. It provides clear explanations of the classes' purposes and how to use the methods effectively.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (1)
22-24
: Annotation Consistency: Ensure Proper Use of@Valid
and@NotNull
The field
pageable
is annotated with@Valid
and@NotNull
, which is appropriate for validation. However, ensure that any subclasses or usages ofPagingRequest
provide a non-nullBasePageable
instance to prevent validation errors.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/Paging.java (0 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (2 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/Paging.java
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1)
1-10
: LGTM! The interface structure is well-defined and serves a clear purpose.The
BaseFilter
interface provides a contract for implementing classes to convert filter criteria into a JPASpecification
. This approach facilitates dynamic query generation based on defined filters, which is a good practice for flexible data retrieval.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import for
BasePage
has been added, which is consistent with the changes in the method signature. This update aligns well with the shift fromPaging
toBasePage
in the pagination model.
12-12
: LGTM: Method signature updated correctly.The return type has been changed from
Paging<Post>
toBasePage<Post>
, which is consistent with the new pagination model. This change aligns with the broader refactoring of the pagination framework mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify that:
- All implementations of this interface have been updated to return
BasePage<Post>
.- All callers of this method now expect and handle
BasePage<Post>
instead ofPaging<Post>
.You can use the following script to check for potential inconsistencies:
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (2)
8-9
: LGTM: Import statement correctly added.The new import for
java.util.Set
is necessary for the implementation of theisOrderPropertyAccepted()
method and is correctly placed with other import statements.
17-21
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the intention behind empty accepted filter fields.
The
isOrderPropertyAccepted()
method is correctly implemented, overriding the superclass method. However, the set of accepted filter fields is currently empty, which means no fields are allowed for ordering ticket messages.Please confirm if this is intentional. If not, consider adding relevant fields that should be allowed for ordering. For example:
final Set<String> acceptedFilterFields = Set.of("id", "timestamp");Also, for better code readability and maintainability, consider defining the accepted fields as a constant:
private static final Set<String> ACCEPTED_ORDER_FIELDS = Set.of("id", "timestamp"); @Override public boolean isOrderPropertyAccepted() { return this.isPropertyAccepted(ACCEPTED_ORDER_FIELDS); }This approach would make it easier to update the accepted fields in the future if needed.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (2)
3-4
: LGTM: New imports are correctly added and used.The new imports for
JsonIgnore
andAssertTrue
are appropriate for their usage in theisOrderPropertyAccepted()
method.
17-23
: Consider adding appropriate fields to the acceptedFilterFields set.The
isOrderPropertyAccepted()
method is correctly implemented and annotated. However, theacceptedFilterFields
set is currently empty, which means no properties are accepted for ordering. This might not be the intended behavior.To ensure this is intentional, please run the following script:
If other classes have non-empty sets, consider adding appropriate fields to
acceptedFilterFields
in this class as well. For example:final Set<String> acceptedFilterFields = Set.of("id", "title", "createdAt");src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1)
14-19
: LGTM: Class declaration and Lombok annotationsThe class declaration and use of Lombok annotations are appropriate. The
BasePageable
class extendsBaseSort
, which seems logical for a pageable object that includes sorting capabilities. The use of Lombok annotations, especially@SuperBuilder
, is well-suited for this scenario.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (1)
1-28
: LGTM: Well-structured pagination modelThe
BasePage<R>
class is well-designed to encapsulate pagination, sorting, and filtering information. The use of Lombok annotations (@Getter, @Setter, @builder) reduces boilerplate code, enhancing maintainability. The fields comprehensively cover all necessary aspects of pagination, including content, page details, sorting, and filtering.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (2)
5-5
: LGTM: Import statement added for BasePageThe addition of the import statement for
BasePage
is consistent with the changes made in thegetPostList
method. This import is necessary for the new return type.
37-37
: LGTM: Updated return type to BasePageThe change from
Paging<Post>
toBasePage<Post>
is consistent with the new pagination model introduced in this PR. This update aligns with the changes in the import statements and the overall objectives of the PR.To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help us verify:
- The usage of
BasePage
in other files.- Any remaining references to the old
Paging
class that might need to be updated.- The return type of
PostService.getPostListAdmin
to ensure it's consistent with this change.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (1)
5-5
: LGTM: Import change is consistent with the new pagination model.The addition of the
BasePage
import aligns with the changes described in the PR objectives and is correctly used in the updated method implementations.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (1)
5-5
: LGTM: Import statement for BasePage is correctly added.The import of
BasePage
is necessary for the new pagination implementation and aligns with the changes made in the methods below.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (4)
6-6
: LGTM: Import statement for BasePage added.The import of
BasePage
is consistent with the changes described in the summary and is necessary for the new pagination implementation.
76-76
: LGTM: Method signature updated to use BasePage.The change from
Paging<Post>
toBasePage<Post>
in the method signature is consistent with the new pagination framework. The method's logic remains intact, ensuring a smooth transition to the new pagination model.
89-94
: LGTM: Method consistently updated to use BasePage.The changes in this method are consistent with those in the
getPostListForAdmin
method. The transition toBasePage
has been implemented correctly, maintaining consistency across the class.
83-86
: LGTM: Method updated to use BasePage, but verify listRequest structure.The changes are consistent with the new pagination framework. However, the change from
listRequest.toPageable()
tolistRequest.getPageable().toPageable()
suggests a structural change in thelistRequest
object.Please verify that the
AdminPostListRequest
class has been updated to include agetPageable()
method that returns an object with atoPageable()
method. Run the following script to check theAdminPostListRequest
class structure:src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (2)
17-19
: Transition from@Data
to Individual Lombok AnnotationsThe use of
@Getter
,@Setter
, and@NoArgsConstructor
replaces the previous@Data
annotation. This change is acceptable if you intend to limit the generated methods to getters, setters, and a no-argument constructor. Verify that methods likeequals()
,hashCode()
, andtoString()
are not required for this class, as@Data
includes them by default.If these methods are needed, consider adding the appropriate Lombok annotations (
@EqualsAndHashCode
,@ToString
) or implementing them manually.
22-26
: Impact of Changing Class to Abstract and Adding Abstract MethodBy making
PagingRequest
an abstract class and adding the abstract methodisOrderPropertyAccepted()
, all subclasses are now required to implement this method. This change may lead to compilation errors if any existing subclasses do not implementisOrderPropertyAccepted()
.Run the following script to identify all subclasses of
PagingRequest
that need to implementisOrderPropertyAccepted()
:✅ Verification successful
All subclasses of
PagingRequest
implementisOrderPropertyAccepted()
successfully.
- No subclasses are missing the
isOrderPropertyAccepted()
implementation.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all subclasses of 'PagingRequest' that do not implement 'isOrderPropertyAccepted' # Find all Java files that extend 'PagingRequest' rg --type java 'class\s+\w+\s+extends\s+PagingRequest' -l > subclass_files.txt # Check each subclass file for implementation of 'isOrderPropertyAccepted' while IFS= read -r file; do if ! rg 'public\s+boolean\s+isOrderPropertyAccepted\s*\(' "$file" > /dev/null; then echo "Subclass missing 'isOrderPropertyAccepted()' implementation: $file" fi done < subclass_files.txtLength of output: 425
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...in/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@MenekseYuncu issue ile pull requesti ilişkilendirebilir miyiz? |
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (2)
10-14
: Consider using a non-nullable Boolean forisActive
.The class structure is well-designed, implementing the
BaseFilter
interface for consistency. However, consider using a primitiveboolean
instead ofBoolean
for theisActive
field to avoid potential null pointer exceptions. If null values are necessary, ensure proper null checks are implemented throughout the codebase.- private Boolean isActive; + private boolean isActive;If you need to represent three states (true, false, null), you can keep it as
Boolean
but ensure proper null handling in thetoSpecification()
method.
16-26
: LGTM:toSpecification()
implementation with a minor suggestion.The
toSpecification()
method is well-implemented, providing dynamic specification building based on theisActive
field. However, consider handling potential null values in the database column "isActive" to make the filter more robust.Here's a suggestion to improve the implementation:
@Override public Specification<PostEntity> toSpecification() { Specification<PostEntity> specification = Specification.where(null); if (isActive != null) { specification = specification.and((root, query, criteriaBuilder) -> - criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get("isActive"), isActive) + criteriaBuilder.equal(criteriaBuilder.coalesce(root.get("isActive"), false), isActive) ); } return specification; }This change uses
criteriaBuilder.coalesce()
to handle potential null values in the database, defaulting tofalse
if the column value is null. This ensures that the filter works correctly even if some records have null values for the "isActive" column.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (3)
3-4
: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate for the changes.The new import statements are correctly added to support the changes in the class, including the new annotations, the
AdminPostFilter
type, and theSet
utility.Also applies to: 8-10
16-16
: LGTM: Filter field added as suggested.The
filter
field of typeAdminPostFilter
has been added, which aligns with the PR objective and addresses the previous review comment about encapsulating a field within the Filter.
18-24
: Verify the intended behavior ofisOrderPropertyAccepted()
.The method is correctly annotated with
@JsonIgnore
and@AssertTrue
. However, it creates an empty set of accepted filter fields, which may not be the intended behavior. This effectively means that no order properties will be accepted.Please verify if this is the desired outcome. If not, consider populating the
acceptedFilterFields
set with the appropriate field names that should be allowed for ordering.To help verify the intended behavior, you can run the following script to check for any usage of order properties in the codebase:
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (1)
1-8
: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package structure and imports are well-organized and relevant to the class's functionality. The use of Lombok annotations (
@Getter
and@Setter
) is a good practice to reduce boilerplate code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (3)
9-13
: Consider renaming the class for clarity.The class structure and use of Lombok annotations are good. However, the class name
TicketMessageFilter
might be misleading if it's actually filtering tickets rather than ticket messages.Consider renaming the class to
TicketFilter
if it's meant to filter tickets. If it is indeed for filtering ticket messages, then the current name is appropriate.
15-25
: LGTM: toSpecification implementation is correct with room for minor improvements.The implementation of
toSpecification
is correct and follows good practices. It properly handles the case whereid
is null and uses a concise lambda expression for the equality check.Consider the following suggestions for improved readability and extensibility:
- Extract the specification creation into a separate private method for better readability:
@Override public Specification<TicketEntity> toSpecification() { Specification<TicketEntity> specification = Specification.where(null); specification = addIdSpecification(specification); return specification; } private Specification<TicketEntity> addIdSpecification(Specification<TicketEntity> specification) { if (id != null) { return specification.and((root, query, criteriaBuilder) -> criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get("id"), id) ); } return specification; }
- Consider using a constant for the "id" string to avoid magic strings:
private static final String ID_FIELD = "id"; // ... in the method criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get(ID_FIELD), id)These changes will make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.
1-26
: Good start on filter infrastructure, consider future extensibility.This
TicketMessageFilter
class aligns well with the PR objectives of creating infrastructure for Pagination, Order, and Filter. It provides a solid foundation for filteringTicketEntity
objects.For future improvements, consider:
Extending the filter to include more fields relevant to
TicketEntity
. This might include fields like status, creation date, or associated user.Implementing a builder pattern or using a library like Querydsl to allow for more complex and dynamic query building.
Adding documentation to explain how to use and extend this filter, especially if it's part of a larger filtering framework.
Ensuring that this filter integrates well with the pagination and ordering components mentioned in the PR objectives.
These considerations will help ensure that the filtering infrastructure remains flexible and scalable as the project grows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (1 hunks)
- src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (3)
7-7
: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The import for
TicketMessageFilter
is appropriately added and necessary for the newfilter
field.
16-16
: LGTM: Field added as per previous suggestion.The
filter
field of typeTicketMessageFilter
has been added, addressing the previous comment about encapsulating within Filter. The@NotNull
annotation ensures that a filter is always provided.
18-22
: Verify the intended behavior ofisOrderPropertyAccepted()
.The method
isOrderPropertyAccepted()
is implemented with an empty set of accepted filter fields. This effectively means that no order properties are accepted for this request. Please confirm if this is the intended behavior.If order properties should be accepted, consider adding the appropriate field names to the
acceptedFilterFields
set.src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (1)
1-8
: LGTM: Imports and package declaration are appropriate.The imports are correctly chosen for the class's functionality, including Lombok annotations, the BaseFilter interface, TicketEntity, and Spring Data JPA's Specification. The package declaration is also correct.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
BaseFilter
,BasePage
,BasePageable
, andBaseSort
classes to enhance pagination, filtering, and sorting capabilities.PagingRequest
andPagingResponse
classes to support new pagination and filtering structures.AdminPostFilter
for filtering posts based on active status.TicketMessageFilter
for filtering ticket messages based on their ID.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Paging
class with the newBasePage
class, improving the overall structure and functionality of pagination handling.AdminController
,PostService
, andPostServiceImpl
to accommodate the new pagination model.TicketMessageRequest
to integrate the newTicketMessageFilter
.