Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#155 | The infrastructure for Pagination, Order, and Filter has been created. #158

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024

Conversation

MenekseYuncu
Copy link
Contributor

@MenekseYuncu MenekseYuncu commented Oct 1, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced BaseFilter, BasePage, BasePageable, and BaseSort classes to enhance pagination, filtering, and sorting capabilities.
    • Added methods for converting filter criteria into specifications and managing paginated data.
    • Enhanced PagingRequest and PagingResponse classes to support new pagination and filtering structures.
    • Added AdminPostFilter for filtering posts based on active status.
    • Introduced TicketMessageFilter for filtering ticket messages based on their ID.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated method signatures across services to utilize the new pagination model, ensuring consistency in data retrieval.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored various classes to replace the deprecated Paging class with the new BasePage class, improving the overall structure and functionality of pagination handling.
    • Modified AdminController, PostService, and PostServiceImpl to accommodate the new pagination model.
    • Updated TicketMessageRequest to integrate the new TicketMessageFilter.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced a new pagination and sorting framework in the org.gelecekbilimde.scienceplatform package. Key components include the addition of interfaces and classes such as BaseFilter, BasePage, BasePageable, and BaseSort, which facilitate the handling of dynamic queries, pagination, and sorting. The previous Paging class was removed, and its functionalities were integrated into the new classes. Additionally, several existing classes were updated to utilize the new pagination model, ensuring consistency across the application.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java Added interface BaseFilter with method toSpecification().
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java Introduced BasePage<R> for pagination, with static factory methods for creating instances.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java Added BasePageable class for pagination, including toPageable() method.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java Introduced BaseSort and BaseOrder classes for structured sorting operations.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/Paging.java Removed Paging<R> class.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java Refactored PagingRequest to an abstract class, added validation methods.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java Updated to use BasePage and added fields for sorting and filtering.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java Changed return type from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post> in getPostList method.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java Added validation method isOrderPropertyAccepted().
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java Updated return type of getPostListAdmin from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post>.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java Changed methods to return BasePage<Post> instead of Paging<Post>.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java Added isOrderPropertyAccepted() method.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java Added TicketMessageFilter class implementing BaseFilter, with toSpecification() method.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant AdminController
    participant PostService
    participant PostRepository
    participant BasePage

    AdminController->>PostService: getPostList(request)
    PostService->>PostRepository: findPosts(pageable)
    PostRepository-->>PostService: List<Post>
    PostService-->>AdminController: BasePage<Post>
Loading

Poem

In a meadow where rabbits play,
New classes hop in, brightening the day.
With filters and pages, they dance and twirl,
Sorting the data in a joyful whirl.
Hooray for the changes, let’s all cheer,
For a smoother journey, the future is near! 🐰✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

The necessary places have been corrected.

The necessary places have been fixed.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (15)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1)

7-8: Consider adding documentation and reviewing the use of @SuppressWarnings.

While the code is functionally correct, there are a couple of points to consider:

  1. The use of @SuppressWarnings suggests there might be underlying issues that could be addressed more directly. Consider if it's possible to use generics or other techniques to avoid the need for suppressing these warnings.

  2. Adding Javadoc comments to explain the purpose of the toSpecification() method and the expected behavior of implementing classes would improve the code's maintainability and usability.

Here's a suggested improvement:

 public interface BaseFilter {

-	@SuppressWarnings({"java:S3740", "rawtypes"})
-	Specification toSpecification();
+	/**
+	 * Converts the filter criteria to a JPA Specification.
+	 *
+	 * @return a Specification object representing the filter criteria
+	 */
+	<T> Specification<T> toSpecification();

 }

This change adds documentation and uses a generic type parameter to avoid the need for @SuppressWarnings.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (1)

Line range hint 1-14: Summary: PostService interface updated to use new pagination model.

The changes in this file are part of the larger effort to introduce a new pagination and sorting framework, as mentioned in the PR objectives. The shift from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post> in the getPostListAdmin method signature reflects this change.

Key points:

  1. The import statements have been updated correctly.
  2. The method signature change is consistent with the new pagination model.

These changes seem appropriate and align well with the PR objectives. However, to ensure a smooth transition, it's crucial to verify that all implementations and usages of this interface across the codebase have been updated consistently.

As this change is part of a significant architectural shift in how pagination is handled, consider the following:

  1. Ensure comprehensive documentation of the new BasePage and related classes to facilitate easier adoption across the team.
  2. Update any relevant API documentation to reflect the changes in return types.
  3. Consider creating or updating integration tests that specifically verify the new pagination behavior.
  4. If not already planned, consider a gradual rollout strategy to minimize potential disruptions, especially if this API is used by external clients.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (3)

30-45: LGTM: Well-implemented factory method with a minor suggestion

The of(Page<E> pageableEntities, List<C> content) method effectively converts a Spring Data Page to a BasePage. The adjustment of the page number to be 1-based is a good practice. Including sorting information conditionally is appropriate.

Minor suggestion: Consider adding a comment explaining the page number adjustment for future maintainers.

 public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities,
                                     final List<C> content) {

     final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder()
         .content(content)
+        // Adjust to 1-based page number for consistency with user expectations
         .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1)
         .pageSize(content.size())
         .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages())
         .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements());

     if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) {
         responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders());
     }

     return responseBuilder.build();
 }

47-64: LGTM: Well-implemented factory method with refactoring suggestion

The of(BaseFilter filter, Page<E> pageableEntities, List<C> content) method effectively extends the functionality of the first method to include filtering. The implementation is consistent with the first method, which is good for maintainability.

Suggestion: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication between the two methods. You could create a private helper method to handle the common logic.

Here's a potential refactoring:

+    private static <E, C> BasePage.BasePageBuilder<C> getBasePageBuilder(
+            final Page<E> pageableEntities, final List<C> content) {
+        final var builder = BasePage.<C>builder()
+            .content(content)
+            .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1)
+            .pageSize(content.size())
+            .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages())
+            .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements());
+
+        if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) {
+            builder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders());
+        }
+
+        return builder;
+    }
+
     public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities,
                                         final List<C> content) {
-        final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder()
-            .content(content)
-            .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1)
-            .pageSize(content.size())
-            .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages())
-            .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements());
-
-        if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) {
-            responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders());
-        }
-
-        return responseBuilder.build();
+        return getBasePageBuilder(pageableEntities, content).build();
     }

     public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final BaseFilter filter,
                                         final Page<E> pageableEntities,
                                         final List<C> content) {
-        final var responseBuilder = BasePage.<C>builder()
-            .content(content)
-            .pageNumber(pageableEntities.getNumber() + 1)
-            .pageSize(content.size())
-            .totalPageCount(pageableEntities.getTotalPages())
-            .totalElementCount(pageableEntities.getTotalElements())
+        return getBasePageBuilder(pageableEntities, content)
-            .filteredBy(filter);
-
-        if (pageableEntities.getSort().isSorted()) {
-            responseBuilder.orderedBy(BaseSort.of(pageableEntities.getSort()).getOrders());
-        }
-
-        return responseBuilder.build();
+            .filteredBy(filter)
+            .build();
     }

This refactoring reduces code duplication and improves maintainability.


1-65: LGTM: Well-designed pagination model with future enhancement suggestions

The BasePage<R> class provides a comprehensive and flexible model for pagination, sorting, and filtering. It effectively leverages Spring Data's Page interface for compatibility with existing systems. The use of generics enhances type safety and reusability.

Suggestions for future enhancements:

  1. Consider adding validation for input parameters in the factory methods.
  2. You might want to add methods for checking if there are next/previous pages available.
  3. Consider implementing Serializable if this class needs to be serialized (e.g., for caching or network transfer).

Here's an example of how you might implement these suggestions:

import java.io.Serializable;

public class BasePage<R> implements Serializable {
    // ... existing fields and methods ...

    public boolean hasNextPage() {
        return pageNumber < totalPageCount;
    }

    public boolean hasPreviousPage() {
        return pageNumber > 1;
    }

    public static <E, C> BasePage<C> of(final Page<E> pageableEntities,
                                        final List<C> content) {
        Objects.requireNonNull(pageableEntities, "pageableEntities must not be null");
        Objects.requireNonNull(content, "content must not be null");
        // ... existing implementation ...
    }

    // ... similar null checks for the other factory method ...
}
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (1)

Line range hint 1-62: Overall assessment: Changes align with PR objectives

The modifications in this file successfully implement the transition from Paging to BasePage for the AdminController. The changes are minimal and focused, maintaining the existing functionality while updating the pagination model.

To ensure a smooth transition:

  1. Verify that all necessary changes have been made in related files, especially in PostService.
  2. Update any documentation or comments that might reference the old Paging class.
  3. Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the new BasePage functionality in this context.

As you continue to implement this new pagination framework:

  • Ensure consistent usage of BasePage across all controllers and services.
  • Consider creating a migration guide for other developers working on the project.
  • If not already done, update any API documentation to reflect the changes in the pagination model.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (2)

34-37: LGTM: Pagination handling updated correctly.

The changes in the ticketMessageRead method are consistent with the new pagination model. The Paging class has been correctly replaced with BasePage, and the method for obtaining the Pageable object has been updated.

However, there's a minor optimization opportunity:

Consider extracting ticketResponses to a local variable to avoid calling ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map() twice:

 Pageable pageable = request.getPageable().toPageable();
 Page<TicketMessageEntity> messagePage = ticketMessageRepository.findAll(pageable);
-List<TicketMessageResponse> ticketResponses = ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent());
+List<TicketMessageResponse> ticketResponses = ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent());
 final BasePage<TicketMessageResponse> posts = BasePage.of(messagePage, ticketResponses);
 return PagingResponse.<TicketMessageResponse>builder()
   .of(posts)
-  .content(ticketMessageEntityToMessageResponseMapper.map(messagePage.getContent()))
+  .content(ticketResponses)
   .build();

This change would improve performance by avoiding redundant mapping operations.


Line range hint 1-64: LGTM: Consistent implementation of the new pagination model.

The changes in this class align well with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The new pagination model has been correctly and consistently implemented across the relevant methods.

As a minor suggestion for improved code organization:

Consider extracting the common logic for creating the PagingResponse into a private helper method. This would reduce code duplication and make future changes easier. For example:

private <T> PagingResponse<T> createPagingResponse(Page<?> page, List<T> content) {
    final BasePage<T> basePage = BasePage.of(page, content);
    return PagingResponse.<T>builder()
        .of(basePage)
        .content(content)
        .build();
}

Then, you can use this method in both ticketMessageRead and ticketMessageReadSelf:

return createPagingResponse(messagePage, ticketResponses);

This change would make the code more DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) and easier to maintain.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (3)

37-41: LGTM with a minor suggestion for optimization.

The changes correctly implement the new pagination framework. However, there's a potential redundancy in setting the content of the PagingResponse.

Consider removing the redundant content setting in the PagingResponse builder:

 final BasePage<TicketResponse> posts = BasePage.of(ticketPage, ticketResponses);
-return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).content(ticketEntityToResponseMapper.map(ticketPage.getContent())).build();
+return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).build();

The content is already set in the BasePage object, so there's no need to set it again in the builder.


62-65: LGTM with the same suggestion for optimization as in ticketRead.

The changes correctly implement the new pagination framework for the ticketReadSelf method. However, the same potential redundancy in setting the content of the PagingResponse exists here.

Consider removing the redundant content setting in the PagingResponse builder, similar to the suggestion for ticketRead:

 final BasePage<TicketResponse> posts = BasePage.of(ticketPage, ticketResponses);
-return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).content(ticketEntityToResponseMapper.map(ticketPage.getContent())).build();
+return PagingResponse.<TicketResponse>builder().of(posts).build();

This change will make the code more consistent and remove unnecessary duplication.


Multiple usages of old Paging classes found.

The investigation revealed that PagingRequest and PagingResponse are still used across several files, indicating that the migration to the new pagination framework is incomplete. These usages include:

  • TicketServiceImpl.java
  • TicketController.java
  • AdminController.java
  • TicketMessageServiceImpl.java
  • TicketUserController.java
  • ...and others.

Please update these instances to align with the new pagination framework to ensure consistency and maintainability.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-67: Overall implementation looks good. Verify wider impact.

The changes consistently implement the new pagination framework across the TicketServiceImpl class. The use of BasePage and the updated method for obtaining Pageable objects are applied correctly.

To ensure consistency across the codebase:

  1. Verify that all other service implementations have been updated similarly.
  2. Check if there are any remaining usages of the old Paging class that need to be replaced.

Run the following script to check for any remaining usages of the old Paging class:

This will help identify any areas that might need further updates to align with the new pagination framework.


To ensure that all usages of the old Paging classes have been addressed, please run the following scripts:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for remaining usages of the old Paging class
echo "Searching for remaining usages of the old Paging class:"
rg --type java "import.*Paging" src
echo "Searching for usages of Paging in Java files:"
rg --type java "\bPaging\b" src

Length of output: 2856


Script:

# Search for method parameters or return types using PagingRequest or PagingResponse
echo "Searching for method signatures with PagingRequest or PagingResponse:"
rg --type java '\bPagingRequest\b|\bPagingResponse\b' src

# Search for variable declarations using PagingRequest or PagingResponse
echo "Searching for variable declarations with PagingRequest or PagingResponse:"
rg --type java '\bPagingRequest\b|\bPagingResponse\b' src

Length of output: 15507

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (1)

Line range hint 1-97: Overall changes look good, but consider adding tests.

The transition from Paging to BasePage has been implemented consistently throughout the class. The changes align with the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The overall structure and logic of the class remain intact, which is positive.

However, given the significance of these changes to the pagination framework, it would be beneficial to ensure that appropriate unit tests are in place or updated to reflect these changes.

Would you like assistance in generating or updating unit tests for this class to cover the new BasePage implementation?

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java (1)

33-40: Set the content field in the builder

In the of method, the content field is not being set. To ensure that PagingResponse includes the content from BasePage, consider adding .content(page.getContent()) to the builder chain.

Apply this diff to include the content:

     public <M> PagingResponse.PagingResponseBuilder<R> of(final BasePage<M> page) {
         return PagingResponse.<R>builder()
             .pageNumber(page.getPageNumber())
             .pageSize(page.getPageSize())
             .totalPageCount(page.getTotalPageCount())
             .totalElementCount(page.getTotalElementCount())
+            .content(page.getContent())
             .orderedBy(page.getOrderedBy())
             .filteredBy(page.getFilteredBy());
     }
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java (1)

18-68: Enhance code documentation with Javadoc comments

Adding Javadoc comments to the BaseSort class, the inner BaseOrder class, the Direction enum, and methods like toSort() and of() will improve code readability and maintainability. It provides clear explanations of the classes' purposes and how to use the methods effectively.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (1)

22-24: Annotation Consistency: Ensure Proper Use of @Valid and @NotNull

The field pageable is annotated with @Valid and @NotNull, which is appropriate for validation. However, ensure that any subclasses or usages of PagingRequest provide a non-null BasePageable instance to prevent validation errors.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84a6f46 and cc4376c.

📒 Files selected for processing (14)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseSort.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/Paging.java (0 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/response/PagingResponse.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (2 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/Paging.java
🔇 Additional comments (19)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BaseFilter.java (1)

1-10: LGTM! The interface structure is well-defined and serves a clear purpose.

The BaseFilter interface provides a contract for implementing classes to convert filter criteria into a JPA Specification. This approach facilitates dynamic query generation based on defined filters, which is a good practice for flexible data retrieval.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/PostService.java (2)

3-3: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.

The import for BasePage has been added, which is consistent with the changes in the method signature. This update aligns well with the shift from Paging to BasePage in the pagination model.


12-12: LGTM: Method signature updated correctly.

The return type has been changed from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post>, which is consistent with the new pagination model. This change aligns with the broader refactoring of the pagination framework mentioned in the PR objectives.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please verify that:

  1. All implementations of this interface have been updated to return BasePage<Post>.
  2. All callers of this method now expect and handle BasePage<Post> instead of Paging<Post>.

You can use the following script to check for potential inconsistencies:

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (2)

8-9: LGTM: Import statement correctly added.

The new import for java.util.Set is necessary for the implementation of the isOrderPropertyAccepted() method and is correctly placed with other import statements.


17-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Verify the intention behind empty accepted filter fields.

The isOrderPropertyAccepted() method is correctly implemented, overriding the superclass method. However, the set of accepted filter fields is currently empty, which means no fields are allowed for ordering ticket messages.

Please confirm if this is intentional. If not, consider adding relevant fields that should be allowed for ordering. For example:

final Set<String> acceptedFilterFields = Set.of("id", "timestamp");

Also, for better code readability and maintainability, consider defining the accepted fields as a constant:

private static final Set<String> ACCEPTED_ORDER_FIELDS = Set.of("id", "timestamp");

@Override
public boolean isOrderPropertyAccepted() {
    return this.isPropertyAccepted(ACCEPTED_ORDER_FIELDS);
}

This approach would make it easier to update the accepted fields in the future if needed.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (2)

3-4: LGTM: New imports are correctly added and used.

The new imports for JsonIgnore and AssertTrue are appropriate for their usage in the isOrderPropertyAccepted() method.


17-23: Consider adding appropriate fields to the acceptedFilterFields set.

The isOrderPropertyAccepted() method is correctly implemented and annotated. However, the acceptedFilterFields set is currently empty, which means no properties are accepted for ordering. This might not be the intended behavior.

To ensure this is intentional, please run the following script:

If other classes have non-empty sets, consider adding appropriate fields to acceptedFilterFields in this class as well. For example:

final Set<String> acceptedFilterFields = Set.of("id", "title", "createdAt");
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1)

14-19: LGTM: Class declaration and Lombok annotations

The class declaration and use of Lombok annotations are appropriate. The BasePageable class extends BaseSort, which seems logical for a pageable object that includes sorting capabilities. The use of Lombok annotations, especially @SuperBuilder, is well-suited for this scenario.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePage.java (1)

1-28: LGTM: Well-structured pagination model

The BasePage<R> class is well-designed to encapsulate pagination, sorting, and filtering information. The use of Lombok annotations (@Getter, @Setter, @builder) reduces boilerplate code, enhancing maintainability. The fields comprehensively cover all necessary aspects of pagination, including content, page details, sorting, and filtering.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/controller/AdminController.java (2)

5-5: LGTM: Import statement added for BasePage

The addition of the import statement for BasePage is consistent with the changes made in the getPostList method. This import is necessary for the new return type.


37-37: LGTM: Updated return type to BasePage

The change from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post> is consistent with the new pagination model introduced in this PR. This update aligns with the changes in the import statements and the overall objectives of the PR.

To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following verification script:

This script will help us verify:

  1. The usage of BasePage in other files.
  2. Any remaining references to the old Paging class that might need to be updated.
  3. The return type of PostService.getPostListAdmin to ensure it's consistent with this change.
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketMessageServiceImpl.java (1)

5-5: LGTM: Import change is consistent with the new pagination model.

The addition of the BasePage import aligns with the changes described in the PR objectives and is correctly used in the updated method implementations.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/service/impl/TicketServiceImpl.java (1)

5-5: LGTM: Import statement for BasePage is correctly added.

The import of BasePage is necessary for the new pagination implementation and aligns with the changes made in the methods below.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (4)

6-6: LGTM: Import statement for BasePage added.

The import of BasePage is consistent with the changes described in the summary and is necessary for the new pagination implementation.


76-76: LGTM: Method signature updated to use BasePage.

The change from Paging<Post> to BasePage<Post> in the method signature is consistent with the new pagination framework. The method's logic remains intact, ensuring a smooth transition to the new pagination model.


89-94: LGTM: Method consistently updated to use BasePage.

The changes in this method are consistent with those in the getPostListForAdmin method. The transition to BasePage has been implemented correctly, maintaining consistency across the class.


83-86: LGTM: Method updated to use BasePage, but verify listRequest structure.

The changes are consistent with the new pagination framework. However, the change from listRequest.toPageable() to listRequest.getPageable().toPageable() suggests a structural change in the listRequest object.

Please verify that the AdminPostListRequest class has been updated to include a getPageable() method that returns an object with a toPageable() method. Run the following script to check the AdminPostListRequest class structure:

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/request/PagingRequest.java (2)

17-19: Transition from @Data to Individual Lombok Annotations

The use of @Getter, @Setter, and @NoArgsConstructor replaces the previous @Data annotation. This change is acceptable if you intend to limit the generated methods to getters, setters, and a no-argument constructor. Verify that methods like equals(), hashCode(), and toString() are not required for this class, as @Data includes them by default.

If these methods are needed, consider adding the appropriate Lombok annotations (@EqualsAndHashCode, @ToString) or implementing them manually.


22-26: Impact of Changing Class to Abstract and Adding Abstract Method

By making PagingRequest an abstract class and adding the abstract method isOrderPropertyAccepted(), all subclasses are now required to implement this method. This change may lead to compilation errors if any existing subclasses do not implement isOrderPropertyAccepted().

Run the following script to identify all subclasses of PagingRequest that need to implement isOrderPropertyAccepted():

✅ Verification successful

All subclasses of PagingRequest implement isOrderPropertyAccepted() successfully.

  • No subclasses are missing the isOrderPropertyAccepted() implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all subclasses of 'PagingRequest' that do not implement 'isOrderPropertyAccepted'

# Find all Java files that extend 'PagingRequest'
rg --type java 'class\s+\w+\s+extends\s+PagingRequest' -l > subclass_files.txt

# Check each subclass file for implementation of 'isOrderPropertyAccepted'
while IFS= read -r file; do
  if ! rg 'public\s+boolean\s+isOrderPropertyAccepted\s*\(' "$file" > /dev/null; then
    echo "Subclass missing 'isOrderPropertyAccepted()' implementation: $file"
  fi
done < subclass_files.txt

Length of output: 425

@agitrubard
Copy link
Collaborator

@MenekseYuncu issue ile pull requesti ilişkilendirebilir miyiz?

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (2)

10-14: Consider using a non-nullable Boolean for isActive.

The class structure is well-designed, implementing the BaseFilter interface for consistency. However, consider using a primitive boolean instead of Boolean for the isActive field to avoid potential null pointer exceptions. If null values are necessary, ensure proper null checks are implemented throughout the codebase.

- private Boolean isActive;
+ private boolean isActive;

If you need to represent three states (true, false, null), you can keep it as Boolean but ensure proper null handling in the toSpecification() method.


16-26: LGTM: toSpecification() implementation with a minor suggestion.

The toSpecification() method is well-implemented, providing dynamic specification building based on the isActive field. However, consider handling potential null values in the database column "isActive" to make the filter more robust.

Here's a suggestion to improve the implementation:

 @Override
 public Specification<PostEntity> toSpecification() {
     Specification<PostEntity> specification = Specification.where(null);

     if (isActive != null) {
         specification = specification.and((root, query, criteriaBuilder) ->
-            criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get("isActive"), isActive)
+            criteriaBuilder.equal(criteriaBuilder.coalesce(root.get("isActive"), false), isActive)
         );
     }
     return specification;
 }

This change uses criteriaBuilder.coalesce() to handle potential null values in the database, defaulting to false if the column value is null. This ensures that the filter works correctly even if some records have null values for the "isActive" column.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86030bc and 478c097.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/common/model/BasePageable.java
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/service/impl/PostServiceImpl.java
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/request/AdminPostListRequest.java (3)

3-4: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate for the changes.

The new import statements are correctly added to support the changes in the class, including the new annotations, the AdminPostFilter type, and the Set utility.

Also applies to: 8-10


16-16: LGTM: Filter field added as suggested.

The filter field of type AdminPostFilter has been added, which aligns with the PR objective and addresses the previous review comment about encapsulating a field within the Filter.


18-24: Verify the intended behavior of isOrderPropertyAccepted().

The method is correctly annotated with @JsonIgnore and @AssertTrue. However, it creates an empty set of accepted filter fields, which may not be the intended behavior. This effectively means that no order properties will be accepted.

Please verify if this is the desired outcome. If not, consider populating the acceptedFilterFields set with the appropriate field names that should be allowed for ordering.

To help verify the intended behavior, you can run the following script to check for any usage of order properties in the codebase:

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/post/model/AdminPostFilter.java (1)

1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.

The package structure and imports are well-organized and relevant to the class's functionality. The use of Lombok annotations (@Getter and @Setter) is a good practice to reduce boilerplate code.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (3)

9-13: Consider renaming the class for clarity.

The class structure and use of Lombok annotations are good. However, the class name TicketMessageFilter might be misleading if it's actually filtering tickets rather than ticket messages.

Consider renaming the class to TicketFilter if it's meant to filter tickets. If it is indeed for filtering ticket messages, then the current name is appropriate.


15-25: LGTM: toSpecification implementation is correct with room for minor improvements.

The implementation of toSpecification is correct and follows good practices. It properly handles the case where id is null and uses a concise lambda expression for the equality check.

Consider the following suggestions for improved readability and extensibility:

  1. Extract the specification creation into a separate private method for better readability:
@Override
public Specification<TicketEntity> toSpecification() {
    Specification<TicketEntity> specification = Specification.where(null);
    specification = addIdSpecification(specification);
    return specification;
}

private Specification<TicketEntity> addIdSpecification(Specification<TicketEntity> specification) {
    if (id != null) {
        return specification.and((root, query, criteriaBuilder) ->
            criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get("id"), id)
        );
    }
    return specification;
}
  1. Consider using a constant for the "id" string to avoid magic strings:
private static final String ID_FIELD = "id";

// ... in the method
criteriaBuilder.equal(root.get(ID_FIELD), id)

These changes will make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.


1-26: Good start on filter infrastructure, consider future extensibility.

This TicketMessageFilter class aligns well with the PR objectives of creating infrastructure for Pagination, Order, and Filter. It provides a solid foundation for filtering TicketEntity objects.

For future improvements, consider:

  1. Extending the filter to include more fields relevant to TicketEntity. This might include fields like status, creation date, or associated user.

  2. Implementing a builder pattern or using a library like Querydsl to allow for more complex and dynamic query building.

  3. Adding documentation to explain how to use and extend this filter, especially if it's part of a larger filtering framework.

  4. Ensuring that this filter integrates well with the pagination and ordering components mentioned in the PR objectives.

These considerations will help ensure that the filtering infrastructure remains flexible and scalable as the project grows.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 478c097 and 8794eda.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (1 hunks)
  • src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/request/TicketMessageRequest.java (3)

7-7: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.

The import for TicketMessageFilter is appropriately added and necessary for the new filter field.


16-16: LGTM: Field added as per previous suggestion.

The filter field of type TicketMessageFilter has been added, addressing the previous comment about encapsulating within Filter. The @NotNull annotation ensures that a filter is always provided.


18-22: Verify the intended behavior of isOrderPropertyAccepted().

The method isOrderPropertyAccepted() is implemented with an empty set of accepted filter fields. This effectively means that no order properties are accepted for this request. Please confirm if this is the intended behavior.

If order properties should be accepted, consider adding the appropriate field names to the acceptedFilterFields set.

src/main/java/org/gelecekbilimde/scienceplatform/ticket/model/TicketMessageFilter.java (1)

1-8: LGTM: Imports and package declaration are appropriate.

The imports are correctly chosen for the class's functionality, including Lombok annotations, the BaseFilter interface, TicketEntity, and Spring Data JPA's Specification. The package declaration is also correct.

@agitrubard agitrubard merged commit a8b1fc1 into main Oct 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@agitrubard agitrubard deleted the issue-155/pagination-order-and-filter branch October 3, 2024 08:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Pagination, Order, Filter Alt Yapısının Oluşturulması
2 participants