test: migrate exec_test.go from testify to ginkgo

[Ayush-Patel-56]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Migrates pkg/utils/kubeclient/exec_test.go from testify to ginkgo/gomega as a PoC for issue #5322.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Partially addresses #5322

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

No new tests added. All existing tests migrated to ginkgo/gomega with same coverage.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Run go test -v ./pkg/utils/kubeclient - all 122 tests should pass.

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

This is a PoC to validate the migration approach. If this looks good, I can continue migrating other test files incrementally.

[fluid-e2e-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign cheyang for approval by writing /assign @cheyang in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Ayush-Patel-56, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request initiates the migration of the project's testing infrastructure by converting a specific test file from the testify framework to ginkgo/gomega. This change serves as a foundational step to evaluate the new testing framework's suitability and workflow for broader adoption across the codebase, aiming to standardize and potentially enhance the testing experience without altering the functional behavior of the tested code.

Highlights

• Test Framework Migration: Migrated the exec_test.go file from the testify testing framework to ginkgo/gomega as a Proof of Concept (PoC) for a larger initiative.
• Test Structure Refactoring: Refactored all existing tests within exec_test.go to align with the ginkgo Describe, Context, and It block structure, utilizing gomega matchers for assertions.
• No New Test Coverage: Ensured that the migration maintained the same test coverage as the original testify tests, with no new test cases introduced or removed.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog

• pkg/utils/kubeclient/exec_test.go
  • Removed testing and strings imports.
  • Added ginkgo/v2 and gomega imports.
  • Rewrote all TestXxx functions into ginkgo Describe, Context, and It blocks.
  • Replaced testify assertions with gomega matchers (e.g., Expect(err).To(HaveOccurred())).
  • Adapted gomonkey patching logic to ginkgo's BeforeEach and AfterEach hooks.

Activity

• The pull request was created as a Proof of Concept (PoC) to validate the migration approach for testing frameworks.
• The author explicitly requested special notes for reviews, indicating this is an initial step for a larger migration.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[fluid-e2e-bot]

Hi @Ayush-Patel-56. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request migrates the tests in exec_test.go from the standard testing package and testify to ginkgo and gomega. The migration is well-executed, improving the test structure by breaking down large test cases into smaller, more descriptive It blocks. The use of ginkgo features like BeforeEach, AfterEach, and GinkgoRecover is appropriate. I have one suggestion to improve test robustness by replacing a time.Sleep with gomega.Eventually to avoid potential flakiness.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
37.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.30%. Comparing base (f94acd1) to head (73721dd).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5670   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.29%   61.30%           
=======================================
  Files         444      444           
  Lines       30540    30540           
=======================================
+ Hits        18721    18724    +3     
+ Misses      10276    10274    -2     
+ Partials     1543     1542    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Ayush-Patel-56]

I start by picking a package (e.g., pkg/utils or pkg/ddc) and migrating its tests from testify to ginkgo as a Proof of Concept (PoC). This will help validate the approach before rolling it out more broadly.

/assign @cheyang