[compiler] InferEffects uses effects as value keys #33650
+290
−131
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 26, 2025
github-actions
bot
added
the
React Core Team
… functions
If you have a local helper function that itself returns a function (`() => () => { ... }`), we currently infer the return effect of the outer function as `Create mutable`. We correctly track the aliasing, but we lose some precision because we don't understand that a function specifically is being returned.
Here, we do some extra analysis of which values are returned in InferMutationAliasingRanges, and if the sole return value is a function we infer a `CreateFunction` effect. We also infer an `Assign` (instead of a Create) if the sole return value was one of the context variables or parameters.
We currently assume that any functions passes as props may be event handlers or effect functions, and thus don't check for side effects such as mutating globals. However, if a prop is a function that returns JSX that is a sure sign that it's actually a render helper and not an event handler or effect function. So we now emit a `Render` effect for any prop that is a JSX-returning function, triggering all of our render validation. This required a small fix to InferTypes: we weren't correctly populating the `return` type of function types during unification. I also improved the printing of types so we can see the inferred return types.
In InferReferenceEffects we used `InstructionValue` as the key to represent values, since each time we process an instruction this object will be the same. However this was always a bit of a hack, and in the new model and InferMutationAliasingEffects we can instead use the (creation) effect as the stable value. This avoids an extra layer of memoization since the effects are already interned anyway.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In InferReferenceEffects we used
InstructionValueas the key to represent values, since each time we process an instruction this object will be the same. However this was always a bit of a hack, and in the new model and InferMutationAliasingEffects we can instead use the (creation) effect as the stable value. This avoids an extra layer of memoization since the effects are already interned anyway.Stack created with Sapling. Best reviewed with ReviewStack.