Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabling more verbose logging with the arguments used when shelling o… #88

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thehcma
Copy link

@thehcma thehcma commented Oct 11, 2022

…ut, logging env vars, and minor improvement on the organization of passthrough env vars

Differential Revision: D40161133

fbshipit-source-id: 189b3755113fc1f785c088d5771f8d1d74730c14

Henrique Andrade and others added 2 commits October 11, 2022 09:05
…ut, logging env vars, and minor improvement on the organization of passthrough env vars

Differential Revision: D40161133

fbshipit-source-id: 189b3755113fc1f785c088d5771f8d1d74730c14
@thehcma
Copy link
Author

thehcma commented Oct 11, 2022

@jaymzh - the internal diff has been merged. I have now amended the commit message to reflect the relevant change here. Please let me know if I messed something up in doing so. And apologies for any confusion.

@jaymzh
Copy link
Collaborator

jaymzh commented Oct 12, 2022

Thanks, much appreciated!

@thehcma
Copy link
Author

thehcma commented Oct 12, 2022

Thanks, much appreciated!

The failing steps here are simply formatting - and don't match the internal ones. Do you need me to fix it or can this be merged? (fyi, merging is blocked for me)

@jaymzh
Copy link
Collaborator

jaymzh commented Oct 12, 2022

There's no delta here, so there's nothing to be merged. However, even if there was, I believe this is all ShipIt controlled, so you can't merge on GH, only in Phab, and then it gets synced out.

@jaymzh
Copy link
Collaborator

jaymzh commented Oct 12, 2022

That said, the mis-match in formatting is likely due to mis-matched versions of Rubocop. They should be sync'd up. @NaomiReeves can probably help with that (I would, but I don't have access to the internal state). The tl;dr is figuring out what version of the tools are currently in ChefWorkstation (and/or fb-chefdk-gems) that's in use internally, and then updating the tests here to specifically use that version.

@thehcma
Copy link
Author

thehcma commented Oct 12, 2022

@jaymzh - as for the "there are no changes here" - I think the original problem you wanted addressed (i.e., the non-sensical commit message wrt to the change that went out publicly vs internally) is still there. I see the change in master, but with the old commit message.

Do you see a way for me (or anybody else) to fix it?

@jaymzh
Copy link
Collaborator

jaymzh commented Oct 12, 2022

No, you'd break the tree if you amend the message now. ShipIt operates based only on code changes, not on anything else. But it's fine. We can just close those. But we should definitely get tests passing both internally and externally.

@thehcma
Copy link
Author

thehcma commented Oct 12, 2022

No, you'd break the tree if you amend the message now. ShipIt operates based only on code changes, not on anything else. But it's fine. We can just close those. But we should definitely get tests passing both internally and externally.

Internally, we are good - externally, we have those linter issues. But I suppose I can't fix that - let's hope @NaomiReeves can.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit to facebook/chef-cookbooks that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2022
Summary:
Addresses the mismatch brought up in
facebook/chef-utils#88

Reviewed By: joshuamiller01

Differential Revision: D40436121

fbshipit-source-id: 19df276646273ecc032723acef00b90f765d081e
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @thehcma!

Thank you for your pull request.

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention.

You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

1 similar comment
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @thehcma!

Thank you for your pull request.

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and yours needs attention.

You currently have a record in our system, but the CLA is no longer valid, and will need to be resubmitted.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

Soufiane88216 added a commit to Soufiane88216/Cookbook that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Summary:
Addresses the mismatch brought up in
facebook/chef-utils#88

Reviewed By: joshuamiller01

Differential Revision: D40436121

fbshipit-source-id: 19df276646273ecc032723acef00b90f765d081e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants