Skip to content

Conversation

@emscripten-forge-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Beep-boop-beep! Whistle-whistle-woo!

@emscripten-forge-bot emscripten-forge-bot added the Automerge The PR will be automatically merged if CI is green label Oct 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the initial-build-libheif_for_emscripten-4x branch 6 times, most recently from 7519cd6 to 9e4c8d7 Compare October 27, 2025 01:11
@github-actions github-actions bot force-pushed the initial-build-libheif_for_emscripten-4x branch 3 times, most recently from 05b98b0 to 4fe139c Compare October 31, 2025 01:06
@IsabelParedes IsabelParedes force-pushed the initial-build-libheif_for_emscripten-4x branch from 4fe139c to 342c45b Compare November 5, 2025 11:36
@IsabelParedes IsabelParedes added the 4.X Emscripten v4.x label Nov 5, 2025
@IsabelParedes
Copy link
Member

- $BUILD_PREFIX/opt/emsdk/upstream/emscripten/cache/sysroot/include/emscripten/wire.h:124:19: 
- error: static assertion failed due to requirement '!
- std::is_pointer<heif_image_handle *>::value': Implicitly binding raw pointers is illegal.
- Specify allow_raw_pointer<arg<?>>
- 124 |     static_assert(!std::is_pointer<T*>::value, "Implicitly binding raw pointers is illegal.  Specify 

@IsabelParedes IsabelParedes removed the Automerge The PR will be automatically merged if CI is green label Nov 6, 2025
@IsabelParedes
Copy link
Member

@emscripten-forge-bot emscripten-forge-bot added the Needs Human Review The CI is not passing, automerge is disabled label Dec 17, 2025
@emscripten-forge-bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Either the CI is failing, or the recipe is not tested. I need help from a human.
Ping the maintainers: @emscripten-forge
If you believe you are wrongly pinned, please comment here or open a PR removing you from the maintainers list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

4.X Emscripten v4.x Needs Human Review The CI is not passing, automerge is disabled

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants