Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ml-nlp-e5.asciidoc (#2769) #2770

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

szabosteve
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

This PR forwardports the changes of the following commit to main:
Update ml-nlp-e5.asciidoc #2769

Typos from traned to trained
@szabosteve szabosteve requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2024 10:01
Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Aug 12, 2024

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @szabosteve? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-/d./d is the label to automatically backport to the /d./d branch. /d is the digit
    NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

@mergify mergify bot added the backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify label Aug 12, 2024
@szabosteve szabosteve merged commit 0007cbf into elastic:main Aug 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@szabosteve szabosteve deleted the e5-forward-port branch August 12, 2024 11:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify :ml nlp v8.16
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants