-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
Add parent dependency check on samples #397
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add parent dependency check on samples #397
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
6898fd1 to
518fdb2
Compare
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
…_file.sh now builds the parents yaml file and returns the children samples of the parent stacks. Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
…es job. Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
518fdb2 to
959bbce
Compare
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
1678d0c to
0c6827c
Compare
0c6827c to
a4ac51c
Compare
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
CI changes, N/A |
thepetk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general looks good to me, left only some minor comments. Tested locally and it works. Very nice addition :)
Jdubrick
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good to me. I pushed your branch to my own repo and tested the workflow and it works great! After changes Fanis suggested are made I think this is good to get approved
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Valdron <[email protected]>
|
Just thinking out loud: the logic introduced in this PR could potentially be adopted to resolved #401 (comment) -- good timing :) |
thepetk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm really helpful check!
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Jdubrick, michael-valdron, thepetk The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What does this PR do?:
Adds new script and new workflow to perform testing on child samples of stacks.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
fixes devfile/api#1142
PR acceptance criteria:
Have you read the devfile registry contributing guide and followed its instructions?
Does this repository's tests pass with your changes?
Does any documentation need to be updated with your changes?
Have you tested the changes with existing tools, i.e. Odo, Che, Console? (See devfile registry contributing guide on how to test changes)
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: