-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updates all functions to require the use of contexts #10
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent modifications across various files primarily focus on integrating context handling within method signatures for improved management. This consistent addition of the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- pika.go (2 hunks)
- pika_psql.go (17 hunks)
- pika_psql_experimental.go (2 hunks)
- pika_psql_experimental_test.go (8 hunks)
- pika_psql_test.go (72 hunks)
Additional comments: 20
pika_psql_experimental_test.go (2)
- 4-4: The import of the
context
package is correctly added to support the use ofcontext.Background()
in test function calls.- 14-14: The addition of
context.Background()
to theAll()
method calls in test functions is correctly implemented, aligning with the changes made to the method signatures to accept acontext.Context
parameter.Also applies to: 25-25, 36-36, 48-48, 59-59, 70-70, 80-80
pika.go (1)
- 90-90: The addition of
ctx context.Context
parameter to the method signatures ofCreate
,Update
,Delete
,GetOrNil
,Get
,All
,Count
, andGetPage
aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing context handling across the application.Also applies to: 94-94, 98-98, 103-103, 109-109, 112-112, 115-115, 160-160
pika_psql.go (1)
- 36-40: The addition of context parameters to various functions and adjustments to method calls to include context parameters in
pika_psql.go
align with the PR objectives of enhancing context handling throughout the codebase. These changes ensure better context management, especially in database operations.Also applies to: 253-265, 278-289, 298-309, 319-333, 347-358, 367-378, 387-415, 537-573
pika_psql_test.go (16)
- 306-306: Adding
context.Background()
as an argument toGetOrNil
is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize context usage across the application. However, for tests, it's often useful to use a timeout or deadline with the context to prevent tests from hanging indefinitely if something goes wrong. Consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
for more robust test behavior.- 329-329: Similar to the previous comment, using
context.Background()
directly in tests might not be the best approach due to the lack of control over test execution time. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help ensure that tests fail gracefully if they take too long to execute.- 352-352: Again, using
context.Background()
directly in tests is observed. It's recommended to usecontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
to better manage test execution time and ensure tests do not hang indefinitely.- 375-375: The direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is noted. For better test management and to avoid indefinite hanging of tests, consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
.- 397-397: As with previous instances, the direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help manage test execution time more effectively.- 413-413: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. To improve test robustness and manage execution time, consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
.- 443-443: Direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. Usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
is recommended for better test execution management.- 471-471: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. For improved test management, consider implementing a timeout or deadline with the context.- 496-496: Direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. It's advisable to usecontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
to manage test execution time more effectively.- 521-521: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. Consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
for better control over test execution time.- 546-546: Direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help ensure tests do not hang indefinitely.- 571-571: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. For better test management, consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
.- 599-599: Again, the direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. Usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
is recommended for better test execution management.- 618-618: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. To improve test robustness and manage execution time, consider usingcontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
.- 652-652: Direct use of
context.Background()
in test functions is observed. It's advisable to usecontext.WithTimeout
orcontext.WithDeadline
to manage test execution time more effectively.- 686-686: The use of
context.Background()
directly in tests is noted. For improved test management, consider implementing a timeout or deadline with the context.
@clowenhg Could you also add context to the U, F and D experimental methods? |
I added it to D and U, which perform Delete and Update. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- pika_psql_experimental.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pika_psql_experimental.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- pika.go (4 hunks)
- pika_psql_experimental_test.go (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pika.go
- pika_psql_experimental_test.go
Summary by CodeRabbit