Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updates all functions to require the use of contexts #10

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

clowenhg
Copy link
Collaborator

@clowenhg clowenhg commented Mar 26, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced context handling across database operations for consistent context management during creation, update, deletion, and retrieval.

@clowenhg clowenhg requested a review from mstg March 26, 2024 20:27
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent modifications across various files primarily focus on integrating context handling within method signatures for improved management. This consistent addition of the context.Context parameter to critical functions such as Create, Update, Delete, and various query methods ensures streamlined context passing and better control over database operations, enhancing the overall codebase's robustness and flexibility.

Changes

Files Summary of Changes
pika.go Added ctx context.Context parameter to Create, Update, Delete, GetOrNil, Get, All, Count, and GetPage methods for consistent context handling.
pika_psql_experimental_test.go Added context package import and passed context.Background() to the All() method calls for simpleModel1 queries in various test functions.

🐇✨
In a land of code and binary,
Amidst the fields of data, so airy,
A rabbit hopped with a mission so grand,
Spreading context with a gentle hand.
Through Create, Update, and even Delete,
It left its mark, oh so neat,
Ensuring every function call,
Was handled well, once and for all.
🎉🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c97a81e and 61bf1c6.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • pika.go (2 hunks)
  • pika_psql.go (17 hunks)
  • pika_psql_experimental.go (2 hunks)
  • pika_psql_experimental_test.go (8 hunks)
  • pika_psql_test.go (72 hunks)
Additional comments: 20
pika_psql_experimental_test.go (2)
  • 4-4: The import of the context package is correctly added to support the use of context.Background() in test function calls.
  • 14-14: The addition of context.Background() to the All() method calls in test functions is correctly implemented, aligning with the changes made to the method signatures to accept a context.Context parameter.

Also applies to: 25-25, 36-36, 48-48, 59-59, 70-70, 80-80

pika.go (1)
  • 90-90: The addition of ctx context.Context parameter to the method signatures of Create, Update, Delete, GetOrNil, Get, All, Count, and GetPage aligns with the PR objectives of enhancing context handling across the application.

Also applies to: 94-94, 98-98, 103-103, 109-109, 112-112, 115-115, 160-160

pika_psql.go (1)
  • 36-40: The addition of context parameters to various functions and adjustments to method calls to include context parameters in pika_psql.go align with the PR objectives of enhancing context handling throughout the codebase. These changes ensure better context management, especially in database operations.

Also applies to: 253-265, 278-289, 298-309, 319-333, 347-358, 367-378, 387-415, 537-573

pika_psql_test.go (16)
  • 306-306: Adding context.Background() as an argument to GetOrNil is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize context usage across the application. However, for tests, it's often useful to use a timeout or deadline with the context to prevent tests from hanging indefinitely if something goes wrong. Consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline for more robust test behavior.
  • 329-329: Similar to the previous comment, using context.Background() directly in tests might not be the best approach due to the lack of control over test execution time. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help ensure that tests fail gracefully if they take too long to execute.
  • 352-352: Again, using context.Background() directly in tests is observed. It's recommended to use context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline to better manage test execution time and ensure tests do not hang indefinitely.
  • 375-375: The direct use of context.Background() in test functions is noted. For better test management and to avoid indefinite hanging of tests, consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline.
  • 397-397: As with previous instances, the direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help manage test execution time more effectively.
  • 413-413: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. To improve test robustness and manage execution time, consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline.
  • 443-443: Direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. Using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline is recommended for better test execution management.
  • 471-471: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. For improved test management, consider implementing a timeout or deadline with the context.
  • 496-496: Direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. It's advisable to use context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline to manage test execution time more effectively.
  • 521-521: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. Consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline for better control over test execution time.
  • 546-546: Direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. Implementing a timeout or deadline with the context can help ensure tests do not hang indefinitely.
  • 571-571: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. For better test management, consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline.
  • 599-599: Again, the direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. Using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline is recommended for better test execution management.
  • 618-618: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. To improve test robustness and manage execution time, consider using context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline.
  • 652-652: Direct use of context.Background() in test functions is observed. It's advisable to use context.WithTimeout or context.WithDeadline to manage test execution time more effectively.
  • 686-686: The use of context.Background() directly in tests is noted. For improved test management, consider implementing a timeout or deadline with the context.

@mstg
Copy link
Contributor

mstg commented Mar 27, 2024

@clowenhg Could you also add context to the U, F and D experimental methods?

@clowenhg
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added it to D and U, which perform Delete and Update.
F doesn't directly call into the driver, it only modifies the data in the QuerySet like the other Filter functions.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61bf1c6 and 05aa278.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • pika_psql_experimental.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pika_psql_experimental.go

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05aa278 and 293a94b.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • pika.go (4 hunks)
  • pika_psql_experimental_test.go (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • pika.go
  • pika_psql_experimental_test.go

@mstg mstg merged commit b5cc282 into main Mar 28, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants