fix: 🐛 Codebase Indexing still not work

[owl-app]

Description

@chezsmithy @Patrick-Erichsen after refactoring in this PR #5894 and #5993 codebasing indexing still is not working properly. After starting extension, initialization message appears but process does not start. Problem is not with line:

await this.codeBaseIndexer.refreshCodebaseIndex(dirs);

which was replaced by the line below:

void this.codeBaseIndexer.refreshCodebaseIndex(dirs);

The problem is that during refactoring the lines with:

void this.messenger.request...

have been replaced by:

await this.messenger.request...

And we will never get response from messenger. The code works correctly before the refactor because it didn't wait for responses. In useWebviewListener we are unable to check whether the listener service has ended:

window.addEventListener("message", listener);

Checklist

• I've read the contributing guide
• The relevant docs, if any, have been updated or created
• The relevant tests, if any, have been updated or created

Screenshots

[ For visual changes, include screenshots. Screen recordings are particularly helpful, and appreciated! ]

Tests

Tested through visual inspection of loading the extension in the debugger and observing indexing now seems to start as expected.

[cubic-dev-ai]

Your cubic subscription is currently inactive. Please reactivate your subscription to receive AI reviews and use cubic.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for continuedev canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	955ab93
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/continuedev/deploys/68459469e30802000800208b

[github-actions]

Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

---

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

---

_{You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request. Posted by the CLA Assistant Lite bot.}

[chezsmithy]

100% agree. I caught 1 more of these during the subsequent refactoring use but you caught a few more yet. Appreciate it!

[owl-app]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[Patrick-Erichsen]

recheck

[Patrick-Erichsen]

Perhaps worth a quick double check that the changes in #5564 which I just merged are valid as well.