Skip to content

Conversation

kelvinou01
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Resolves #146

@kelvinou01 kelvinou01 changed the title Refactor RepoDataRecord::Channel from a simple string to Channel refactor: change RepoDataRecord::Channel from a simple string to Channel Apr 1, 2025
@kelvinou01 kelvinou01 force-pushed the refactor/repodatarecord-channel branch from ed09e75 to 64e84c4 Compare April 1, 2025 07:04
@kelvinou01 kelvinou01 changed the title refactor: change RepoDataRecord::Channel from a simple string to Channel refactor: change RepoDataRecord::channel from a simple string to Channel Apr 1, 2025
@kelvinou01 kelvinou01 force-pushed the refactor/repodatarecord-channel branch from 64e84c4 to ed09e75 Compare April 1, 2025 07:11
@baszalmstra
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe it makes sense to use ChannelUrl instead of Channel since thats the more canonical form.

@kelvinou01 kelvinou01 marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2025 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Channel in RepoDataRecord is a simple String

2 participants