doco/website: Add footnote to VW-group cars to prevent user confusion about where harness connects (option 2 - brand-specific footnote) #2842
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up from commaai/openpilot#36325
The Comma website is missing information for VW car users informing them that the J533 harness doesn't connect to the usual location on the windshield camera as advertised on the Comma website. This omission caused users to be confused and their Comma installation delayed when the harness connector didn't match the camera connector which they expected to plug into. People think they got the wrong connector, have to go to Discord etc.
This change fixes the customer experience by adding a footnote that directs the users to connect to the correct module under the dash.
The brand-specific copy solution option here leads to creation of more footnotes in CARS.md as more footnotes are added into respective brands'
values.py
files, but it gives the customer a clearer guidance about where to plug the harness, likely reducing some Discord back-and-forths, consumers sending devices back etc. The CARS.md would end up with one footnote for each brand, but this might be a good tradeoff for getting greater end-customer clarity on the website.The brand-agnostic, more generic copy alternative is in PR #2841
Thoughts?