-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add security rules for detecting hard-coded secrets in C# and Python #98
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Sakshis seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces multiple security rules across C# and Python applications aimed at detecting hard-coded secrets. Specifically, it adds rules for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
tests/python/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (2)
24-53
: Consider adding more test cases for comprehensive coverage.While the current test cases cover basic scenarios, consider adding tests for:
- Empty passwords
- Connection string URLs
- F-string interpolated passwords
- Password variables from config files
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 47-47: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
47-47
: Remove trailing whitespace.Fix the trailing whitespace in line 47.
- pswd2 = get_from_config() + pswd2 = get_from_config()🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 47-47: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
rules/python/security/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (1)
15-236
: Consider enhancing pattern matching for edge cases.The current patterns could miss some security issues. Consider adding patterns for:
- Empty passwords
- Connection string URLs
- F-string interpolated passwords
Example pattern for empty passwords:
- has: stopBy: end kind: string field: value all: + - not: + has: + stopBy: end + kind: string_content - has: stopBy: end kind: string_startrules/python/security/python-pymysql-empty-password-python.yml (1)
17-66
: Enhance pattern matching for additional empty password variantsThe current pattern only matches literal empty strings (
""
). Consider extending it to catch:
- Single quotes (
''
)- Triple quotes (
""""""
or''''''
)- String concatenation (
'' + ''
)Would you like me to provide the extended pattern matching implementation?
tests/python/python-pymysql-empty-password-python-test.yml (1)
2-6
: Expand valid test cases for better coverageConsider adding these valid scenarios:
- Password from secure vault/HSM
- Password from encrypted configuration
- Password from AWS Secrets Manager or similar services
Would you like me to provide the additional test cases?
tests/csharp/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp-test.yml (2)
3-4
: Consider enhancing the valid test cases.While using command-line arguments is better than hard-coding, consider adding more secure examples such as:
- Environment variables
- Azure Key Vault or other secure secret management solutions
- Configuration providers with encrypted values
6-29
: Enhance test coverage with additional scenarios.The invalid test cases could be expanded to include:
- Empty passwords
- Connection strings with embedded credentials
- Passwords in string interpolation
- Passwords in constants or readonly fields
Additionally, consider using different password values across test cases to ensure the rule isn't just matching the specific string "reee!".
tests/__snapshots__/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp-snapshot.yml (1)
1-262
: Consider adding metadata comments to snapshots.While the snapshots are technically correct, adding comments to describe:
- The security pattern being tested
- Expected detection behavior
- Relationship to CWE/OWASP guidelines
Would improve maintainability and help other developers understand the test cases.
rules/csharp/security/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp.yml (1)
4-14
: Enhance security guidance in the message.The message provides good basic guidance but could be improved by:
- Adding specific examples of secure alternatives
- Mentioning the risks of source control exposure
- Referencing additional security resources
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
rules/csharp/security/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp.yml
(1 hunks)rules/python/security/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python.yml
(1 hunks)rules/python/security/python-pymysql-empty-password-python.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/__snapshots__/python-pymysql-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml
(1 hunks)tests/csharp/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp-test.yml
(1 hunks)tests/python/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml
(1 hunks)tests/python/python-pymysql-empty-password-python-test.yml
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
tests/python/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml
[error] 47-47: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/python/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-test.yml (1)
2-23
: LGTM! Valid test cases demonstrate secure password handling practices.
The test cases correctly validate three secure approaches:
- Using variable references
- Using environment variables
- Using getenv calls
tests/__snapshots__/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python-snapshot.yml (1)
1-293
: LGTM! Snapshot correctly documents the test cases.
The snapshot file properly captures:
- AST node positions
- Source code segments
- Style information for pattern matching
rules/python/security/python-pymssql-hardcoded-secret-python.yml (2)
1-14
: LGTM! Clear documentation with appropriate security references.
The rule includes:
- Clear warning message
- Relevant CWE-798 reference
- OWASP A07:2021 reference
- Link to OWASP Secrets Management Cheat Sheet
237-241
: LGTM! Rule composition correctly combines all patterns.
The rule properly combines all three patterns using the any
operator.
tests/__snapshots__/python-pymysql-empty-password-python-snapshot.yml (1)
1-114
: Snapshot file is well-structured but will need updates
The snapshot correctly captures the current test cases. However, it will need to be regenerated after implementing the suggested improvements to the rule and test cases.
rules/csharp/security/oracleconnectionstringbuilder-hardcoded-secret-csharp.yml (1)
242-247
: Consider adding pattern validation.
The rule could benefit from additional validation to:
- Ensure patterns don't conflict
- Verify no false positives with similar property names
- Check for performance impact of complex patterns
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
OracleConnectionStringBuilder
andpymssql
libraries.pymssql
andpymysql
.Bug Fixes
Tests