Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Nov 4, 2025

📄 123% (1.23x) speedup for AsyncMemory._should_use_agent_memory_extraction in mem0/memory/main.py

⏱️ Runtime : 7.89 microseconds 3.53 microseconds (best of 30 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization focuses on improving the performance of the _should_use_agent_memory_extraction method through early exit logic and avoiding unnecessary computation.

Key Optimization:

  • Early Return Pattern: Instead of computing both conditions (has_agent_id and has_assistant_messages) regardless of the first condition's result, the optimized version immediately returns False if agent_id is missing, avoiding the expensive any() operation entirely.

  • Efficient Loop Structure: When agent_id is present, the code uses a simple for loop that returns True immediately upon finding the first assistant message, rather than the any() function which creates a generator expression and potentially scans all messages.

Performance Impact:
The line profiler shows the optimization eliminates the expensive any() call (which took 66.4% of the original execution time at 9764ns). In the optimized version, when agent_id is None (common case), the function exits early after just two operations, reducing total runtime from 14.7µs to 6.8µs.

Minor Optimization:

  • Tuple vs List: Changed the membership test from ["faiss", "qdrant"] to ("faiss", "qdrant") for slightly better performance in the in operator.

This optimization is particularly effective for scenarios where agent_id is frequently missing from metadata, as it completely avoids the message scanning loop. Even when agent_id is present, the loop-based approach is more efficient than any() for early termination cases.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 3 Passed
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
test_pytest_testsconfigstest_prompts_py_testsvector_storestest_weaviate_py_testsllmstest_deepseek_py_test__replay_test_0.py::test_mem0_memory_main_AsyncMemory__should_use_agent_memory_extraction 3.00μs 1.25μs 139%✅
test_pytest_testsvector_storestest_opensearch_py_testsvector_storestest_upstash_vector_py_testsllmstest_l__replay_test_0.py::test_mem0_memory_main_AsyncMemory__should_use_agent_memory_extraction 4.89μs 2.28μs 115%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-AsyncMemory._should_use_agent_memory_extraction-mhk2kz7t and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization focuses on improving the performance of the `_should_use_agent_memory_extraction` method through early exit logic and avoiding unnecessary computation.

**Key Optimization:**
- **Early Return Pattern**: Instead of computing both conditions (`has_agent_id` and `has_assistant_messages`) regardless of the first condition's result, the optimized version immediately returns `False` if `agent_id` is missing, avoiding the expensive `any()` operation entirely.

- **Efficient Loop Structure**: When `agent_id` is present, the code uses a simple `for` loop that returns `True` immediately upon finding the first assistant message, rather than the `any()` function which creates a generator expression and potentially scans all messages.

**Performance Impact:**
The line profiler shows the optimization eliminates the expensive `any()` call (which took 66.4% of the original execution time at 9764ns). In the optimized version, when `agent_id` is None (common case), the function exits early after just two operations, reducing total runtime from 14.7µs to 6.8µs.

**Minor Optimization:**
- **Tuple vs List**: Changed the membership test from `["faiss", "qdrant"]` to `("faiss", "qdrant")` for slightly better performance in the `in` operator.

This optimization is particularly effective for scenarios where `agent_id` is frequently missing from metadata, as it completely avoids the message scanning loop. Even when `agent_id` is present, the loop-based approach is more efficient than `any()` for early termination cases.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 November 4, 2025 04:29
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Nov 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants