Skip to content

printing for revision analysis off #663

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

dsweber2
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

Please:

  • Make sure this PR is against "dev", not "main" (unless this is a release
    PR).
  • Request a review from one of the current main reviewers:
    brookslogan, nmdefries.
  • Makes sure to bump the version number in DESCRIPTION. Always increment
    the patch version number (the third number), unless you are making a
    release PR from dev to main, in which case increment the minor version
    number (the second number).
  • Describe changes made in NEWS.md, making sure breaking changes
    (backwards-incompatible changes to the documented interface) are noted.
    Collect the changes under the next release number (e.g. if you are on
    1.7.2, then write your changes under the 1.8 heading).
  • Styling and documentation checks. Make a PR comment with:
    • /document to check the package documentation and fix any issues.
    • /style to check the style and fix any issues.
    • /preview-docs to preview the docs.
    • See Actions GitHub tab to track progress of these commands.
  • See DEVELOPMENT.md for more information on the development
    process.

Change explanations for reviewer

Minor typo leading to the date range printing wrong. See the snapshots for an example

@dsweber2 dsweber2 requested a review from brookslogan April 18, 2025 20:59
@brookslogan brookslogan merged commit 5e8e09e into dev Apr 21, 2025
3 checks passed
@brookslogan brookslogan deleted the tiny_revision_printing_fix branch April 21, 2025 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants