-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
manage all dependency settings with managed dependencies #77
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hypirion I'd be curious to hear if you had any thoughts on whether this is a reasonably future-proof way to check whether a version is specified. It seems like leiningen is already somewhat committed to this approach so it's probably fine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A more accurate way to do this would be to fully parse the dependency vector. Doing this by hand is a lot of work for little gain. I think the above works for all valid dependency vectors with/without versions, but if you can think of cases where it doesn't I'm happy to change this.
As an aside, I have (alpha) spec definitions for the dependency vectors. I didn't think of adding them here as they would require Clojure 1.9+. However, I can put them in if they are useful, although I'd probably need help in creating the conditional build/test with Clojure 1.9.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@cprice404: Yeah, this should be fine. If this changes in tools depending on pomegranate, then they can just normalize the input arguments.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@loomis nice... you might be interested in technomancy/leiningen#2223, which introduces some spec stuff for the full lein project map (and does so in a way that doesn't require Clojure 1.9 AFAIK). It might be nice to try to consolidate the parts of the spec that are common - e.g. dependency vectors... and maybe pomegranate is a reasonable place to do that. (Not suggesting it would need to be done as part of this PR or anything, just food for thought :) )