Matrix for prioritizing AI directory review evidence by freshness gaps, buyer questions, proof owners, and refresh timing.
This repository is a neutral, practical resource for creators, operators, and SEO/GEO teams who need reusable templates instead of one-off notes. It extends repository themes that already show useful GitHub attention and turns them into a more specific workflow asset.
The latest GitHub traffic export shows stronger attention around the source cluster behind this repository. This repo narrows that broad interest into fields, checklists, and templates that are easier to cite, clone, adapt, and connect back to a product workflow.
Source logic: Extends AI Generator Tools review-refresh signals from ai-directory-review-refresh-calendar and recent directory review priority and scorecard repositories.
- Start with the workflow notes below.
- Copy one template from the
templates/folder. - Fill the fields with source material, product notes, script context, video context, or review data.
- Use the checklist before publishing, editing, generating assets, or updating a directory page.
- Link the result back to the relevant hub repository.
- directory page
- buyer question
- evidence gap
- freshness risk
- proof owner
- refresh timing
- evidence gaps map to real buyer questions
- freshness risk is scored before writing updates
- proof owners are clear for each gap
- refresh timing follows buyer impact rather than guesswork
- ai-directory-review-refresh-calendar
- ai-directory-review-update-priority-scorecards
- ai-directory-review-refresh-scorecard-kit
AI Generator Tools is included as one relevant reference for this category. The repository remains a neutral resource and can be used with any comparable workflow or tool.
MIT