Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update Apollo GraphQL packages (major) #10

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update Apollo GraphQL packages (major) #10

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 12, 2021 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@apollo/gateway (source) ^0.38.0 -> ^2.0.0 age adoption passing confidence
apollo-server-express (source) 2.25.1 -> 3.13.0 age adoption passing confidence
graphql-subscriptions 1.2.1 -> 3.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

apollographql/federation (@​apollo/gateway)

v2.9.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.9.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.9.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.9.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.8.5

Compare Source

v2.8.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.8.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.8.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.8.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.8.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Implement new directives to allow getting and setting context. This allows resolvers to reference and access data referenced by entities that exist in the GraphPath that was used to access the field. The following example demonstrates the ability to access the prop field within the Child resolver. (#​2988)

    type Query {
  p: Parent!
}
type Parent @​key(fields: "id") @​context(name: "context") {
  id: ID!
  child: Child!
  prop: String!
}
type Child @​key(fields: "id") {
  id: ID!
  b: String!
  field(a: String @​fromContext(field: "$context { prop }")): Int!
}
Patch Changes

v2.7.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.7.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Implement progressive @override functionality (#​2911)

    The progressive @override feature brings a new argument to the @override directive: label: String. When a label is added to an @override application, the override becomes conditional, depending on parameters provided to the query planner (a set of which labels should be overridden). Note that this feature will be supported in router for enterprise users only.

    Out-of-the-box, the router will support a percentage-based use case for progressive @override. For example:

    type Query {
  hello: String @​override(from: "original", label: "percent(5)")
}

    The above example will override the root hello field from the "original" subgraph 5% of the time.

    More complex use cases will be supported by the router via the use of coprocessors/rhai to resolve arbitrary labels to true/false values (i.e. via a feature flag service).

Patch Changes

v2.6.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.6.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.6.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.6.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add more information to OpenTelemetry spans. (#​2700)

    Rename operationName to graphql.operation.name and add a
    graphql.operation.type attribute, in conformance with the OpenTelemetry
    Semantic Conventions for GraphQL. The operationName attribute is now
    deprecated, but it is still emitted alongside graphql.operation.name.

    Add a graphql.document span attribute to the gateway.request span,
    containing the entire GraphQL source sent in the request. This feature
    is disable by default.

    When one or more GraphQL or internal errors occur, report them in the
    OpenTelemetry span in which they took place, as an exception event. This
    feature is disabled by default.

    To enable the graphql.document span attribute and the exception event
    reporting, add the following entries to your ApolloGateway instance
    configuration:

    const gateway = new ApolloGateway({
  // ...
  telemetry: {
    // Set to `true` to include the `graphql.document` attribute
    includeDocument: true,
    // Set to `true` to report all exception events, or set to a number
    // to report at most that number of exception events per span
    reportExceptions: true,
    // or: reportExceptions: 1
  },
});

  • Update license field in package.json to use Elastic-2.0 SPDX identifier (#​2741)

  • Introduce the new @policy scope for composition (#​2818)

    Note that this directive will only be fully supported by the Apollo Router as a GraphOS Enterprise feature at runtime. Also note that composition of valid @policy directive applications will succeed, but the resulting supergraph will not be executable by the Gateway or an Apollo Router which doesn't have the GraphOS Enterprise entitlement.

    Users may now compose @policy applications from their subgraphs into a supergraph.

    The directive is defined as follows:

    scalar federation__Policy

directive @​policy(
  policies: [[federation__Policy!]!]!
) on FIELD_DEFINITION | OBJECT | INTERFACE | SCALAR | ENUM

    The Policy scalar is effectively a String, similar to the FieldSet type.

    In order to compose your @policy usages, you must update your subgraph's federation spec version to v2.6 and add the @policy import to your existing imports like so:

    @​link(url: "https://specs.apollo.dev/federation/v2.6", import: [..., "@​policy"])

  • Add graphql.operation.name attribute on gateway.plan span (#​2807)

Patch Changes

v2.5.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.5.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.5.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Fix specific case for requesting __typename on interface entity type (#​2775)

    In certain cases, when resolving a __typename on an interface entity (due to it actual being requested in the operation), that fetch group could previously be trimmed / treated as useless. At a glance, it appears to be a redundant step, i.e.:

    { ... on Product { __typename id }} => { ... on Product { __typename} }

    It's actually necessary to preserve this in the case that we're coming from an interface object to an (entity) interface so that we can resolve the concrete __typename correctly.

  • Don't preserve useless fetches which downgrade __typename from a concrete type back to its interface type. (#​2778)

    In certain cases, the query planner was preserving some fetches which were "useless" that would rewrite __typename from its already-resolved concrete type back to its interface type. This could result in (at least) requested fields being "filtered" from the final result due to the interface's __typename in the data where the concrete type's __typename was expected.

    Specifically, the solution was compute the path between newly created groups and their parents when we know that it's trivial ([]). Further along in the planning process, this allows to actually remove the known-useless group.

  • Propagate type information when renaming entity fields (#​2776)

    Aliased entity fields might have been incorrectly overwritten if multiple fields/aliases shared the same name. Query planner automatically renames conflicting fields to ensure we can always generate a valid GraphQL query. The underlying issue was that this key rewriting logic was assuming the same type of an object. In case of entity queries asking for those aliased fields, we ended up always attempting to apply field renaming logic regardless, whether or not a given entity was of the correct type. This fix ensures that the query planner logic correctly accounts for the object type when applying field renaming logic.

  • Updated dependencies [66d7e4ce, a37bbbf6]:

v2.5.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Adds header to change the format of exposed query plans, and allows formatting it as json. (#​2724)

    When the gateway is configured to allow it, adding the Apollo-Query-Plan-Experimental header to a request already allowed a "prettified" text version of the query plan used for the query is returned in the response extension. This changes adds support for a new (optional) accompanying header, Apollo-Query-Plan-Experimental-Format, which can be set to the value "internal" to have the query plan returned as a json object (that correspond to the internal representation of that query plan) instead of the text version otherwise sent. Note that if that new header is not provided, then the query plan continues to be send in the previous prettified text version.

  • Fix some potentially incorrect query plans with @requires when some dependencies are involved. (#​2726)

    In some rare case of @requires, an over-eager optimisation was incorrectly considering that
    a dependency between 2 subgraph fetches was unnecessary, leading to doing 2 subgraphs queries
    in parallel when those should be done sequentially (because the 2nd query rely on results
    from the 1st one). This effectively resulted in the required fields not being provided (the
    consequence of which depends a bit on the resolver detail, but if the resolver expected
    the required fields to be populated (as they should), then this could typically result
    in a message of the form GraphQLError: Cannot read properties of null).

  • Updated dependencies [203b0a44]:

v2.5.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.5.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Remove extraneous call to span.setStatus() on a span which has already ended. (#​2697)

    In cases where a subgraph responded with an error, we would sometimes try to set
    the status of a span which had already ended. This resulted in a warning log to
    the console (but no effect otherwise). This warning should no longer happen.

  • Fix fallbackPollIntervalInMs behavior. (#​2709)

    The fallbackPollIntervalInMs serves 2 purposes:

    • it allows users to provide an Uplink poll interval if Uplink doesn't provide one
    • it allows users to use a longer poll interval that what's prescribed by Uplink

    The second bullet is how the configuration option is documented, but not how it was previously implemented. This change corrects the behavior to respect this configuration if it's provided AND is longer than the Uplink interval.

  • Updated dependencies [35179f08]:

v2.5.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Reapply #​2639: (#​2687)

    Try reusing named fragments in subgraph fetches even if those fragment only apply partially to the subgraph. Before this change, only named fragments that were applying entirely to a subgraph were tried, leading to less reuse that expected. Concretely, this change can sometimes allow the generation of smaller subgraph fetches.

    Additionally, resolve a bug which surfaced in the fragment optimization logic which could result in invalid/incorrect optimizations / fragment reuse.

  • Updated dependencies [b9052fdd]:

v2.5.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Do not run the full suite of graphQL validations on supergraphs and their extracted subgraphs by default in production environment. (#​2657)

    Running those validations on every updates of the schema takes a non-negligible amount of time (especially on large
    schema) and mainly only serves in catching bugs early in the supergraph handling code, and in some limited cases,
    provide slightly better messages when a corrupted supergraph is received, neither of which is worth the cost in
    production environment.

    A new validateSupergraph option is also introduced in the gateway configuration to force this behaviour.

  • Support responses from subgraphs which use the application/graphql-response+json content-type header. (#​2162)

    See graphql-over-http spec for more details:
    https://graphql.github.io/graphql-over-http/draft/#sec-application-graphql-response-json

  • Introduce the new @authenticated directive for composition (#​2644)

    Note that this directive will only be fully supported by the Apollo Router as a GraphOS Enterprise feature at runtime. Also note that composition of valid @authenticated directive applications will succeed, but the resulting supergraph will not be executable by the Gateway or an Apollo Router which doesn't have the GraphOS Enterprise entitlement.

    Users may now compose @authenticated applications from their subgraphs into a supergraph. This addition will support a future version of Apollo Router that enables authenticated access to specific types and fields via directive applications.

    The directive is defined as follows:

    directive @​authenticated on FIELD_DEFINITION | OBJECT | INTERFACE | SCALAR | ENUM

    In order to compose your @authenticated usages, you must update your subgraph's federation spec version to v2.5 and add the @authenticated import to your existing imports like so:

    @​link(url: "https://specs.apollo.dev/federation/v2.5", import: [..., "@​authenticated"])

  • Introduce the new @requiresScopes directive for composition (#​2649)

    Note that this directive will only be fully supported by the Apollo Router as a GraphOS Enterprise feature at runtime. Also note that composition of valid @requiresScopes directive applications will succeed, but the resulting supergraph will not be executable by the Gateway or an Apollo Router which doesn't have the GraphOS Enterprise entitlement.

    Users may now compose @requiresScopes applications from their subgraphs into a supergraph. This addition will support a future version of Apollo Router that enables scoped access to specific types and fields via directive applications.

    The directive is defined as follows:

    scalar federation__Scope

directive @​requiresScopes(
  scopes: [federation__Scope!]!
) on FIELD_DEFINITION | OBJECT | INTERFACE | SCALAR | ENUM

    The Scope scalar is effectively a String, similar to the FieldSet type.

    In order to compose your @requiresScopes usages, you must update your subgraph's federation spec version to v2.5 and add the @requiresScopes import to your existing imports like so:

    @​link(url: "https://specs.apollo.dev/federation/v2.5", import: [..., "@​requiresScopes"])
Patch Changes

v2.4.13

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.4.12

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Remove extraneous call to span.setStatus() on a span which has already ended. (#​2717)

    In cases where a subgraph responded with an error, we would sometimes try to set
    the status of a span which had already ended. This resulted in a warning log to
    the console (but no effect otherwise). This warning should no longer happen.

  • Fix fallbackPollIntervalInMs behavior. (#​2717)

    The fallbackPollIntervalInMs serves 2 purposes:

    • it allows users to provide an Uplink poll interval if Uplink doesn't provide one
    • it allows users to use a longer poll interval that what's prescribed by Uplink

    The second bullet is how the configuration option is documented, but not how it was previously implemented. This change corrects the behavior to respect this configuration if it's provided AND is longer than the Uplink interval.

  • Updated dependencies [693c2433]:

v2.4.11

Compare Source

Patch Changes

  • Reapply #​2639: (#​2684)

    Try reusing named fragments in subgraph fetches even if those fragment only apply partially to the subgraph. Before this change, only named fragments that were applying entirely to a subgraph were tried, leading to less reuse that expected. Concretely, this change can sometimes allow the generation of smaller subgraph fetches.

    Additionally, resolve a bug which surfaced in the fragment optimization logic which could result in invalid/incorrect optimizations / fragment reuse.

  • Updated dependencies [a740e071]:

v2.4.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.4.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.4.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v2.4.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Re-work the code use to try to reuse query named fragments to improve performance (thus sometimes improving query (#​2604)
    planning performance), to fix a possibly raised assertion error (with a message of form like Cannot add selection of field X to selection set of parent type Y), and to fix a rare issue where an interface or union field was not being
    queried for all the types it should be.
  • Updated dependencies [[

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate
Copy link
Author

renovate bot commented Aug 12, 2021 •
edited
Loading

⚠ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json
npm WARN old lockfile 
npm WARN old lockfile The package-lock.json file was created with an old version of npm,
npm WARN old lockfile so supplemental metadata must be fetched from the registry.
npm WARN old lockfile 
npm WARN old lockfile This is a one-time fix-up, please be patient...
npm WARN old lockfile 
npm ERR! code ERESOLVE
npm ERR! ERESOLVE unable to resolve dependency tree
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! While resolving: [email protected]
npm ERR! Found: [email protected]
npm ERR! node_modules/graphql
npm ERR!   graphql@"15.5.1" from the root project
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! Could not resolve dependency:
npm ERR! peer graphql@"^16.5.0" from @apollo/[email protected]
npm ERR! node_modules/@apollo/gateway
npm ERR!   @apollo/gateway@"^2.0.0" from the root project
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm ERR! this command with --force or --legacy-peer-deps
npm ERR! to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! 
npm ERR! For a full report see:
npm ERR! /tmp/worker/bd387e/fa0778/cache/others/npm/_logs/2023-11-14T08_48_49_175Z-eresolve-report.txt

npm ERR! A complete log of this run can be found in: /tmp/worker/bd387e/fa0778/cache/others/npm/_logs/2023-11-14T08_48_49_175Z-debug-0.log

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch 2 times, most recently from 8603dd6 to f30f8c5 Compare August 26, 2021 01:30
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from f30f8c5 to 59cee0c Compare October 11, 2021 22:17
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 59cee0c to 70baf73 Compare March 7, 2022 12:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 70baf73 to d0c6752 Compare March 26, 2022 15:13
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from d0c6752 to 1bbe4e8 Compare April 24, 2022 23:11
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency apollo-server-express to v3 Update Apollo GraphQL packages (major) Apr 24, 2022
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 1bbe4e8 to 922b9b6 Compare May 16, 2022 01:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 922b9b6 to 8537f85 Compare June 18, 2022 20:12
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 8537f85 to 5cc3ce4 Compare September 25, 2022 14:15
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 5cc3ce4 to 4dd89ab Compare November 20, 2022 17:56
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 4dd89ab to 3485fa4 Compare March 18, 2023 06:11
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from 3485fa4 to bb1aafe Compare August 31, 2023 08:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from bb1aafe to e0e4a57 Compare November 14, 2023 08:49
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/major-apollo-graphql-packages branch from e0e4a57 to 5e01bb3 Compare November 12, 2024 02:41
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants