-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
rhel8.6: Apply fix for "unexpected jmp_cond padding" #994
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
patches/rhel8/bpf-next-v3-1-2-bpf-x64-Fix-a-jit-convergence-issue.patch
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Reported-by: Harsimran Pabla <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Dylan Reimerink <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <[email protected]>
b541405 to
fc46bf4
Compare
X-GHA-TAG: 20250923.124500
|
👋
|
|
👋
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The title says rhel8.6 ... but we'd be applying this even for the rhel8.10 image. Did you check if it's still needed there?
In general - there's a number of relevant patches missing from RHEL8, going down the rabbit hole of maintaining their kernel for them sounds a bit daunting. And folks that consume these kernel images now need to understand that their results will be different from testing with a vanilla RHEL8.
Having said that, I'd much prefer to just abandon RHEL8. We've tried multiple ways of having them take relevant fixes - if they don't care, that's a good sign for us to not care either.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Reported-by: Harsimran Pabla [email protected]
Suggested-by: Dylan Reimerink [email protected]