fix(table): update StyleFunc to apply header style correctly #846
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The StyleFunc in the Lipgloss table now correctly returns the header style only when the row is equal to HeaderRow (-1). Previously, it applied the header style when the row was 0, which actually corresponds to the first row of the table, not the header.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
StyleFuncin theLipglosstable now correctly returns the header style only when the row is equal toHeaderRow(-1). Previously, it applied the header style when the row was 0, which actually corresponds to the first row of the table, not the header.The behavior of the
StyleFuncinLipglosstable has changed as outlined in this PR: charmbracelet/lipgloss#377Fixes #833
Changes
StyleFuncto apply the header style only when the row is equal toHeaderRow(-1), instead of 0.